旅游的时空穿越结构机制研究

doi:10.12054/lydk.bisu.121

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文首先通过语义内涵解读、现象考察和比较分析构建了穿越认知逻辑分析框架,然后从语义学视角应用发生学方法、心理距离理论,通过逻辑分析构建旅游时空穿越回环结构、旅游穿越过程结构机制模型,并对旅游穿越结构进行过程机制分析。研究结论认为：旅游的时空转换结构是一种穿越结构,旅游穿越表现出完整的时空穿越特征,具有人类穿越式对话的典型性;旅游结构的本质是时空穿越;旅游穿越就是通过物理时空转换建立心理距离,最终达成心灵对话之目标。因此,旅游运行的核心矛盾就是解决由物理空间转换带来的交通需要和由穿越式对话带来的旅游实景营造需要,从而实现心理时空穿越。本文通过对旅游结构本质的追问,将“穿越”这一日常化语言抽象为学术语言,形成旅游学内生性概念和范畴,为旅游体验活动提供了一种新型的解释话语,并为不同类型穿越结构、穿越感问题的研究拓展了探讨空间。

关键词: 旅游; 穿越; 时空转换; 结构机制; 心理距离理论

Abstract:

This paper constructs a cognitive, logical analysis-based framework of time-travel through semantic connotation interpretation, phenomenon investigation and comparative analysis. The paper then constructs a loop structure of tourism traversing, the structural mechanism model of the tourism traversing process, and then provides a process analysis of tourism traversing structure mechanism by applying a genetic method and psychological distance theory from the perspective of semantics through logical analysis. Through these, it was concluded that the orientation of “You” is to reach an ideal realm that is far away from the annoyance of the world, allow for free leisurely travel, transcends the reality, and allows one to experience true existence. One way to achieve the realm of “You” is the “travel”, the essence of which is the transformation of time and space, and is thus a spiritual journey with the intention of exploring, reconstruction, and of leisurely travel. The structure of traversing tourism is a type of structural time-travel, and the structure of traversing tourism shows the most complete characteristics of space-time traversing. Tourism traversing is typical of human traversing dialogue, and the essence of tourism structure is space-time traversing. The goal of tourism traversing is simply to achieve spiritual dialogue from the physical space-time conversion to the psychological distance establishing. As such, the core contradiction of tourism is to solve the problem of the transportation needs that are brought about by physical space conversion, and the needs of the tourist scene creation that is brought by the traversing dialogue, on top of realizing psychological space-time traversing. This study of tourism time-travel thus faces the time-traveler itself first and discusses the process and mechanism of time-travel, the second is towards tourism research, as one attempts to touch the core contradictions of tourism and establish the core concept of tourism research, the third is facing social language, clear and enrich the social semantics of the concept of “time-travel”.

Keywords: tourism; time-travel; space-time conversion; structure mechanism; psychological distance theory

中图分类号:

陶玉霞, 王仪舒. 旅游的时空穿越结构机制研究[J]. 旅游导刊, 2020, 4(1): 12-18.

Yuxia TAO, Yishu WANG. A Study on the Space-time Structure Mechanism of Tourism Traversing[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2020, 4(1): 12-18.

图/表 4

参考文献 50

[1]	Boerwinkel H W J. Management of recreation and tourist behaviour at different spatial levels[M] //Ashworth G J, Dietvorst A G J. Tourism and Spatial Transformations: Implications for Policy and Planning.Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International, 1995: 241-263.
[2]	Boniface B G, Cooper C P.The Geography of Travel and Tourism[M] . London: Butterworth Heinemann, 1987: 4.
[3]	Boorstin D J. The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America[M] . New York: Harper, 1964: 77-117.
[4]	Brown L. Tourism: A catalyst for existential authenticity[J] .Annals of Tourism Research, 2013(40): 176-190.
[5]	Brown L. Tourism: A catalystBullough E. ‘Psychical distance’ as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle[J] .British Journal of Psychology, 1912, 5(2):87-118.
[6]	Cadwallader M. Problems in cognitive distance: Implications for cognitive mapping[J] .Environment and Behavior, 1979, 11(4):559-576.
[7]	Clifford J.Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century[M] . MA: Harvard University Press, 1997: 408.
[8]	Cohen E. A phenomenology of tourist experiences[J] .Sociology, 1979, 13(2):179-201.
[9]	Graburn N. Secular Ritual: A General Theory of Tourism[M] . London: Cognizant Communications, 2001:42-47.
[10]	Jung C G, McGuire W The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious[M] . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969: 56-58.
[11]	Lewis D K. The paradoxes of time travel[J] .American Philosophical Quarterly, 1976, 13(2):145-152.
[12]	MacCannell D. . Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings[J] .American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 79(3):589-603.
[13]	MacCannell D. Empty Meeting Grounds[M] . London: Routledge, 1992: 5.
[14]	Makkreel R A.Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies[M] . New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1975: 81.
[15]	Walmsley D J, Jenkins J M. Cognitive distance: A neglected issue in travel behavior[J] .Journal of Travel Research, 1992, 31(1):24-29.
[16]	埃德蒙德•胡塞尔.逻辑研究(第二卷第一部分)[M] . 倪梁康, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015: 688:709-744.
[17]	保继刚. 论旅游地理学的研究核心[J] .人文地理, 1992, 7(2):11-18.
[18]	曹晶晶, 章锦河, 周珺, 等.“远方”有多远?——感知距离对旅游目的地选择行为影响的研究进展[J] .旅游学刊, 2018, 33(7):103-118.
[19]	曹诗图, 孙天胜, 周德清. 旅游审美是诗意的对话——兼论中西哲学思想中的审美观[J] .旅游论坛, 2011, 4(2):115-118.
[20]	范文澜. 文心雕龙注[M] . 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1962: 693-695.
[21]	樊友猛, 谢彦君. “体验”的内涵与旅游体验属性新探[J] .旅游学刊, 2017, 32(11):16-25.
[22]	G •齐美尔. 桥与门[M] . 涯鸿, 宇声, 译. 上海: 上海三联出版社, 1991: 8.
[23]	龚鹏程. 游的精神文化史论[M] . 石家庄: 河北教育出版社, 2001: 152-178.
[24]	海德格尔. 存在与时间[M] . 陈嘉映, 王庆节, 译. 北京:三联书店, 1987: 219-223.
[25]	海德格尔. 海德格尔选集[M] . 倪梁康, 译. 上海: 上海三联书店出版社, 1996: 468.
[26]	汉斯—格奥尔格•伽达默尔. 哲学解释学[M] . 夏镇平, 宋建平, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2004: 97-98; 210-227.
[27]	龙江智, 卢昌崇. 从生活世界到旅游世界: 心境的跨越[J] .旅游学刊, 2010, 25(6):25-31.
[28]	卢克•拉斯特. 人类学的邀请[M] . 王媛, 徐默, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008: 22.
[29]	马凌, 孙九霞, 朱竑. 流动、旅游与后现代——一个研究视角与一种精神转向[J] .人文地理, 2017, 32(3):146-151.
[30]	马凌, 朱竑. 旅游研究中建构主义方法论的合法性基础及其方法应用——兼议旅游世界的本质[J] .旅游学刊, 2015, 30(7):100-107.
[31]	潘海颖. 旅游体验审美精神论[J] .旅游学刊, 2012, 27(5):88-93.
[32]	彭兆荣. “失落的主题”: 旅行文化作为民族志的表述范式[J] .世界民族, 2012(7):36-43.
[33]	孙洪波. 旅游世界的符号学阐释[J] . 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 33(5):28-31.
[34]	陶玉霞. 乡村旅游根性意涵的社会调试与价值重建研究[J] .人文地理, 2015, 30(5):117-125.
[35]	陶玉霞. 旅游: 穿越时空的心灵对话[J] .旅游学刊, 2018, 33(8):118-132.
[36]	王宁. 旅游、现代性与“好恶交织”——旅游社会学的理论探索[J] .社会学研究, 1999(6): 93-102.
[37]	维•什克洛夫斯基. 散文理论[M] . 刘宗次, 译. 南昌: 百花洲文艺出版社, 1994: 10.
[38]	吴海伦. 旅游审美观照的哲学阐释[J] .旅游学刊, 2015, 30(6):111-118.
[39]	吴晓东. 临窗的怅望者[J] .读书, 2015(5):66-76.
[40]	吴炫. 文学穿越现实导论[J] .当代文坛, 2010(5): 25-30.
[41]	谢彦君. 论旅游的本质与特征[J] .旅游学刊, 1998(4): 41-44, 63.
[42]	谢彦君. 旅游体验研究——一种现象学的视角[M] . 天津: 南开大学出版社, 2005: 30-32, 55-60.
[43]	许光伟. 《资本论》第四卷的逻辑: 认识发生学[J] .当代经济研究, 2012(10): 1-11, 92.
[44]	杨振之, 谢辉基. 旅游体验研究的再思[J] .旅游学刊, 2017, 32(9):12-23.
[45]	张小军, 吴毅. 何谓旅游?——旅游人类学视角的思考[J] .旅游学刊, 2017, 32(7):119-126.
[46]	张颐武. 玄幻: 想像不可承受之轻[N] .中华读书报, 2006-06-21(009).
[47]	张骁鸣. 现象学体验学说及其对旅游体验研究的启示[J] .旅游学刊, 2016, 31(4):42-50.
[48]	赵刘. 作为意向性的旅游: 兼论旅游世界的时空构造[J] .旅游学刊, 2017, 32(4):78-86.
[49]	赵刘. 旅游世界的直观构造——基于感性充实的现象学透视[J] .旅游学刊, 2018, 33(3):13-22.
[50]	朱光潜. 朱光潜美学文集[M] . 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 1982: 153.

项目	类型	介质	结构特征	过程	功能	结构本质	时效	认同度	选择倾向
文学艺术体验	√	√	√	√	√	不太清楚→认同	较长	76.7%	83.3%
虚拟现实体验	√	√	√	√	√	不太清楚→认同	较短	96.7%	4.3%
旅游体验	√	√	√	√	√	不太清楚→认同	长	83.3%	93.3%
其他补充	钓鱼饮酒
	练字游泳	未解释	经解释	经解释	未解释	经解释	短	10.0%	1.7%
	抽烟探险

项目	类型	介质	结构特征	过程	功能	结构本质	时效	认同度	选择倾向
文学艺术体验	√	√	√	√	√	不太清楚→认同	较长	76.7%	83.3%
虚拟现实体验	√	√	√	√	√	不太清楚→认同	较短	96.7%	4.3%
旅游体验	√	√	√	√	√	不太清楚→认同	长	83.3%	93.3%
其他补充	钓鱼饮酒
	练字游泳	未解释	经解释	经解释	未解释	经解释	短	10.0%	1.7%
	抽烟探险