国内外遗产旅游研究：进展与述评

doi:10.12054/lydk.bisu.198

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文以Web of Science（WOS）和中国知网（CNKI）为数据源,运用CiteSpace可视化分析软件对2016—2021年国内外共计802篇遗产旅游研究文献进行计量分析。从学科、关键词以及共被引文献等方面绘制知识图谱,分析近年来国内外遗产旅游领域研究进展情况,得出以下结论：社会科学领域研究成果丰富,环境科学领域关注度显著提升;真实性与文化认同是国内外遗产旅游研究的核心问题;国外研究侧重人性需求视角,国内则注重在地性供给;关注文化遗产的完整性将成为我国遗产旅游研究的趋势。

关键词: 遗产旅游; CiteSpace; 文献计量; 真实性

Abstract:

With Web of Science and CNKI as data sources, this paper uses CiteSpace to conduct a bibliometric analysis of a total of 802 domestic and foreign research papers on heritage tourism from the years of 2016 to 2021. A knowledge map covering disciplines, keywords, and co-cited academic papers is drawn to illustrate research progress in the field of heritage tourism both at home and abroad in recent years. The paper concludes that there are rich research achievements in the field of social sciences and that increasing attention has been paid to the field of environmental sciences. Authenticity and cultural identity are the core issues in domestic and overseas research on heritage tourism. While foreign researchers focus more on the issue of human needs, domestic researchers pay more attention to local supply. Furthermore, focusing on the integrity of cultural heritage will become a trend in domestic research on heritage tourism.

Keywords: heritage tourism; CiteSpace; bibliometrics; authenticity

中图分类号:

张鹤, 王庆生. 国内外遗产旅游研究：进展与述评[J]. 旅游导刊, 2022, 6(3): 86-101.

ZHANG He, WANG Qingsheng. Research Progress of Heritage Tourism: A Review[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2022, 6(3): 86-101.

图/表 6

参考文献 45

[1]	Apostolakis A. The convergence process in heritage tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2003, 30(4):795-812.
[2]	Bec A, Moyle B, Timms K, et al. Management of immersive heritage tourism experiences:A conceptual model[J]. Tourism Management, 2019(72):117-120.
[3]	Brown G, Smith A, Assaker G. Revisiting the host city:An empirical examination of sport involvement,place attachment,event satisfaction and spectator intentions at the London Olympics[J]. Tourism Management, 2016(55):160-172.
[4]	Brown L, Ibarra K A. Commemoration and the expression of political identity[J]. Tourism Management, 2018(68):79-88.
[5]	Brown L. Tourism:A catalyst for existential authenticity[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2013(40):176-190.
[6]	Bryce D, Murdy S, Alexander M. Diaspora,authenticity and the imagined past[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2017(66):49-60.
[7]	Cho K S, Um S H, Lee T J. Perceived restorativeness of visits to cultural heritage sites[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2016, 21(9):1046-1069.
[8]	Chung N, Lee H, Kim J Y, et al. The role of augmented reality for experience-influenced environments:The case of cultural heritage tourism in Korea[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2018, 57(5):627-643.
[9]	Di Pietro L, Mugion R G, Renzi M F. Heritage and identity:Technology,values and visitor experiences[J]. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2018, 13(2):97-103.
[10]	Dieck M C T, Jung T. A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2018, 21(2):154-174.
[11]	Jiang Y Y, Ramkissoon H, Mavondo F T, et al. Authenticity:The link between destination image and place attachment[J]. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 2017, 26(2):105-124.
[12]	Lak A, Gheitasi M, Timothy D J. Urban regeneration through heritage tourism:Cultural policies and strategic management[J]. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 2020, 18(4):386-403.
[13]	Lu L, Chi C G, Liu Y. Authenticity,involvement,and image:Evaluating tourist experiences at historic districts[J]. Tourism Management, 2015(50):85-96.
[14]	Ma X L, Wang R, Dai M L, et al. The influence of culture on the sustainable livelihoods of households in rural tourism destinations[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2021, 29(8):1235-1252.
[15]	Marschall S. “Personal memory tourism” and a wider exploration of the tourism-memory nexus[J]. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 2012, 10(4):321-335.
[16]	Marschall S. Transnational migrant home visits as identity practice:The case of African migrants in South Africa[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2017(63):140-150.
[17]	Palmer C. Tourism and the symbols of identity[J]. Tourism Management, 1999, 20(3):313-321.
[18]	Park E, Choi B K, Lee T J. The role and dimensions of authenticity in heritage tourism[J]. Tourism Management, 2019(74):99-109.
[19]	Park H Y. Heritage tourism:Emotional journeys into nationhood[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(1):116-135.
[20]	Poria Y, Butler R, Airey D. The core of heritage tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2003, 30(1):238-254.
[21]	Poria Y, Butler R, Airey D. Tourist perceptions of heritage exhibits:A comparative study from Israel[J]. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2006, 1(1):51-72.
[22]	Prince S. Performing genealogy through travel narratives[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2021(86):103104.
[23]	Rasoolimanesh S M, Taheri B, Gannon M, et al. Does living in the vicinity of heritage tourism sites influence residents’ perceptions and attitudes?[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2019, 27(9):1295-1317.
[24]	Shtudiner Z, Klein G, Kantor J. How religiosity affects the attitudes of communities towards tourism in a sacred city:The case of Jerusalem[J]. Tourism Management, 2018(69):167-179.
[25]	Su M M, Dong Y Z, Wall G, et al. A value-based analysis of the tourism use of agricultural heritage systems:Duotian Agrosystem,Jiangsu Province,China[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020, 28(12):2136-2155.
[26]	Timothy D J. Cultural Heritage and Tourism:An Introduction[M]. Bristol: Channel View Publications, 2011:1-15.
[27]	Tsai S P. Augmented reality enhancing place satisfaction for heritage tourism marketing[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2020, 23(9):1078-1083.
[28]	Ung A, Vong T N. Tourist experience of heritage tourism in Macau SAR,China[J]. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2010, 5(2):157-168.
[29]	Yang I C M, French J A, Lee C, et al. The symbolism of international tourism in national identity[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2020(83):102966.
[30]	Yi X L, Fu X X, Yu L, et al. Authenticity and loyalty at heritage sites:The moderation effect of postmodern authenticity[J]. Tourism Management, 2018(67):411-424.
[31]	Zhang C X, Xiao H G, Morgan N, et al. Politics of memories:Identity construction in museums[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2018(73):116-130.
[32]	Zhao Z Y, Liu Z G. Development path of industrial heritage tourism:A case study of Kitakyushu(Japan)[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(21):12099.
[33]	白灵, 陈秋华, 唐靖娴. 林业文化遗产旅游价值评价体系构建与应用——以普洱古茶园为例[J]. 林业经济问题, 2018, 38(6):78-82,109.
	[ BAI Ling, CHEN Qiuhua, TANG Jingxian. Construction and application of tourism value evaluation system for forestry cultural heritage:Taking Pu’ er Ancient tea garden as an example[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2018, 38(6):78-82,109.]
[34]	陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2):242-253.
	[ CHEN Yue, CHEN Chaomei, LIU Zeyuan, et al. The methodology function of CiteSpace mapping knowledge domains[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(2):242-253.]
[35]	冯任军, 马婷. 生态旅游视角下的工业遗产旅游开发与设计[J]. 建筑结构, 2021, 51(21):163-164.
	[ FENG Renjun, MA Ting. Development and design of industrial heritage tourism from the perspective of eco-tourism[J]. Building Structure, 2021, 51(21):163-164. ]
[36]	关晶, 张朝枝. 遗产旅游研究知识图谱——基于CiteSpace的分析[J]. 旅游论坛, 2017, 10(5):56-68.
	[ GUAN Jing, ZHANG Chaozhi. Analysis of mapping knowledge domains of heritage tourism research:Based on CiteSpace[J]. Tourism Forum, 2017, 10(5):56-68.]
[37]	李飞, 邹统钎. 论国家文化公园:逻辑、源流、意蕴[J]. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(1):14-26.
	[ LI Fei, ZOU Tongqian. National culture park:Logic,origins and implications[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(1):14-26.]
[38]	刘晓峰, 邓宇琦, 孙静. 大运河国家文化公园省域管理体制探略[J]. 南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计), 2021(3):45-49.
	[ LIU Xiaofeng, DENG Yuqi, SUN Jing. Discussion on provincial management system of grand canal national cultural park[J]. Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute(Fine Arts & Design), 2021(3):45-49.]
[39]	吕建昌. 中西部地区工业遗产旅游开发的思考——以三线工业遗产为例[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2021(4):153-160.
	[ LYU Jianchang. Some thinking on tourism development of industrial heritage in the Midwest:A case study on the remaining from the three-line construction[J]. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2021(4):153-160.]
[40]	孙丹, 李艳, 陈娟娟. 国际教育技术研究的热点与前沿——基于五本SSCI期刊(2000—2019年)的文献计量分析[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2020, 32(4):74-85.
	[ SUN Dan, LI Yan, CHEN Juanjuan. Hot spots and frontiers of international educational technology research:Bibliometric analysis of five SSCI journals(2000—2019)[J]. Modern Distance Education Research, 2020, 32(4):74-85.]
[41]	王镜. 古都遗产旅游开发模式研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2011:14-26.
	[ WANG Jing. Study on Developing Mode of Heritage Tourism in an Ancient City[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2011:14-26.]
[42]	王馨, 高楠, 白凯. 遗产旅游研究的知识图谱分析——基于1990年以来国内外的重要文献[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(3):117-124.
	[ WANG Xin, GAO Nan, BAI Kai. An analysis of heritage tourism research by knowledge map:Based on important literatures at home and aboard since 1990[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(3):117-124.]
[43]	薛熙明, 赵晓宁, 吴炆佳, 等. 全球与地方:遗产旅游地的重构与调控[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015:129.
	[ XUE Ximing, ZHAO Xiaoning, WU Wenjia, et al. Global and Local:Reconstruction and Regulation of Heritage Tourism Destination[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015:129.]
[44]	张朝枝, 张捷, 苏明明, 等. 遗产旅游的概念与内涵——“重新认识遗产旅游”系列对话连载(一)[J]. 旅游论坛, 2021, 14(1):1-9.
	[ ZHANG Chaozhi, ZHANG Jie, SU Mingming, et al. Concept and connotation of heritage tourism:Serial dialogue on “reunderstanding heritage tourism”[J]. Tourism Forum, 2021, 14(1):1-9.]
[45]	张飞, 杨林生, 何勋, 等. 大运河遗产河道游憩利用适宜性评价[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7):1114-1123.
	[ ZHANG Fei, YANG Linsheng, HE Xun, et al. Recreational suitability evaluation for the heritage sections along the grand canal[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(7):1114-1123.]

排名 Rank	研究学科 Category	频次 Frequency	中心性 Centrality
1	社会科学—其他主题	202	0.19
2	酒店、休闲、体育和旅游	190	0.26
3	环境科学与生态学	88	0.02
4	环境研究	83	0.19
5	商业与经济学	74	0.08
6	科学与技术—其他主题	71	0.18
7	绿色可持续科学与技术	70	0.13
8	管理学	68	0.04
9	环境科学	61	0.28
10	社会学	17	0

排名 Rank	研究学科 Category	频次 Frequency	中心性 Centrality
1	社会科学—其他主题	202	0.19
2	酒店、休闲、体育和旅游	190	0.26
3	环境科学与生态学	88	0.02
4	环境研究	83	0.19
5	商业与经济学	74	0.08
6	科学与技术—其他主题	71	0.18
7	绿色可持续科学与技术	70	0.13
8	管理学	68	0.04
9	环境科学	61	0.28
10	社会学	17	0

文献来源Database	聚类名称Cluster	大小 Size	S值 Silhouette	平均发文年份Mean year	高频术语（LLR） Top terms（log-likelihood ratio）
WOS	revisit intention（重游意愿）	38	0.789	2017	revisit intention（10.28）;tourist experience（7.7）;loyalty（5.92）
	community （社区）	32	0.850	2016	community（10.9）;world heritage（7.62）;sustainable livelihood（7.26）
	ancestral tourism （宗祠旅游）	28	0.753	2018	ancestral tourism（14.73）;cultural identity（9.8）;chinese outbound tourism（6.16）
CNKI	旅游	27	0.949	2018	旅游（29.04）;全域旅游（16.24）;工业遗产（12.61）
	旅游开发	23	0.846	2018	旅游开发（54.06）;体验经济（11.44）;“一带一路”（8.56）
	遗产旅游	22	0.883	2018	遗产旅游（40.5）;博物馆（8.23）;非物质文化遗产（5.99）

文献来源Database	聚类名称Cluster	大小 Size	S值 Silhouette	平均发文年份Mean year	高频术语（LLR） Top terms（log-likelihood ratio）
WOS	revisit intention（重游意愿）	38	0.789	2017	revisit intention（10.28）;tourist experience（7.7）;loyalty（5.92）
	community （社区）	32	0.850	2016	community（10.9）;world heritage（7.62）;sustainable livelihood（7.26）
	ancestral tourism （宗祠旅游）	28	0.753	2018	ancestral tourism（14.73）;cultural identity（9.8）;chinese outbound tourism（6.16）
CNKI	旅游	27	0.949	2018	旅游（29.04）;全域旅游（16.24）;工业遗产（12.61）
	旅游开发	23	0.846	2018	旅游开发（54.06）;体验经济（11.44）;“一带一路”（8.56）
	遗产旅游	22	0.883	2018	遗产旅游（40.5）;博物馆（8.23）;非物质文化遗产（5.99）

排名 Rank		共被引文献 Reference	期刊 Journal	数值 Value	理论贡献 Theoretical contribution
频次	1	Park,Choi & Lee, et al.（2019）	Tourism Management	21	对游客满意度与忠诚度产生显著影响的是通过亲身体验形成的建构真实性和存在真实性,而非旅游目的地本身的客观真实性
	2	Yi,Fu & Yu, et al.（2018）	Tourism Management	17	率先在同一语境中定量评估了感知真实性、存在真实性和后现代真实性,提出管理者可以采用后现代真实性水平作为市场细分基础的对策建议
	3	Lu,Chi & Liu（2015）	Tourism Management	16	感知真实性和对当地活动的参与有助于历史街区目的地形象的形成,提高游客满意度;提出重构和再现遗产的“阶段性真实性”的方法
中心性	1	Brown,Smith & Assaker（2016）	Tourism Management	0.14	以伦敦奥运会为背景,考察了赛事满意度与游客行为意图之间的关系,发现影响重游意向的因素为运动参与和场所依恋,而非赛事满意度
	2	Jiang,Ramkissoon & Mavondo,et al. （2017）	Journal of Hospitality Marketing Management	0.12	探索生态旅游目的地形象、存在真实性和地方依恋之间的关系,认为目的地营销和管理应该突出存在真实性的概念,使用体验式营销策略提高入境旅游市场的游客忠诚度
	3	Brown（2013）	Annals of Tourism Research	0.11	借助海德格尔现象学和萨特存在主义思想揭示旅游在促使人们采取真实态度方面所起的作用,建议使用现象学方法来探索作为变革催化剂的旅游体验,呼吁实证研究