微信公众号

编辑部微信号

旅游导刊 ›› 2024, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (5): 110-130.DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.266

• 综述论文 • 上一篇    

旅游地文化韧性:理论探索与研究展望

李勇泉(), 李蕊(), 阮文奇, 张舒宁   

  1. 华侨大学旅游学院 福建泉州 362021
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-15 修回日期:2024-06-30 出版日期:2024-10-30 发布日期:2024-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 李蕊(1995— ),女,安徽安庆人,华侨大学旅游学院博士研究生,研究方向为旅游文化与创新管理, E-mail: 1325151751@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李勇泉(1977— ),男,福建安溪人,博士,华侨大学旅游学院教授,研究方向为文旅融合与创新管理、区域旅游发展,E-mail: lyqax@163.com
    阮文奇(1992— ),男,江西九江人,博士,华侨大学旅游学院教授,研究方向为旅游目的地管理、文旅融合与创新管理;
    张舒宁(1995— ),女,辽宁开原人,博士,华侨大学旅游学院讲师,研究方向为旅游目的地管理与市场营销。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“数字赋能驱动旅游地文化韧性提升的过程机制及实现路径研究”(22BGL147)

Cultural Resilience of Tourism Destinations: Theoretical Exploration and Research Prospects

LI Yongquan(), LI Rui(), RUAN Wenqi, ZHANG Shuning

  1. Department of Tourism, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China
  • Received:2023-05-15 Revised:2024-06-30 Online:2024-10-30 Published:2024-11-06

摘要:

文化韧性为旅游地及其文化高质量发展提供了全新思路,学术界也关注到旅游地文化韧性的重要性并展开相关分析,但研究脉络尚不清晰。本研究利用系统文献回顾和元分析方法,全面剖析旅游地文化韧性相关文献,从概念内涵、理论基础、方法运用、研究重点等方面明晰现有研究进展,提出未来研究探索方向。研究结果表明:(1)旅游地文化韧性概念界定尚不清晰,仍需强化其基础理论分析;(2)已有研究较多使用定性方法,对混合研究方法等运用不足;(3)评价指标体系的适用性有限,需要开发独立且普适的测度工具;(4)对影响因素挖掘的针对性较弱,仍需深入剖析其前因及演化过程;(5)提升对策的系统性较弱,需要进一步探索其多重路径。本研究有助于弥补旅游地文化韧性文献审查方面的不足,促进其理论理解并为未来拓展理论体系奠定基础,也为提升旅游地文化韧性指明研究方向。

关键词: 文化韧性; 旅游地; 研究框架; 研究展望

Abstract:

Cultural resilience provides a new concept for the high-quality development of tourism destinations and their cultures, and a strong connection exists between them. Academics have also focused on the importance of the cultural resilience of tourism destinations. However, its research lineage remains unclear. This study uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method to comprehensively analyze the literature related to the cultural resilience of tourism destinations. It aims to clarify the existing research progress in terms of conceptual connotation, theoretical foundation, methodological application, and research focus, thereby providing future research directions. The results show that, first, the concept of the cultural resilience of tourism destinations is unclear, and its basic theoretical analysis needs to be strengthened; second, its research methods are mainly qualitative and need to be further explored based on mixed research methods; third, the applicability of the evaluation index system is limited, and an independent measurement system can be developed; fourth, the influencing factors of the cultural resilience of tourism destinations are weakly examined, and its antecedents and evolutionary process should be thoroughly analyzed; and fifth, the systemic nature of countermeasures to enhance the cultural resilience of tourism destinations is weak, and multiple paths need to be further explored. This study can fill the gap in the literature vis-à-vis the cultural resilience of tourism destinations and promote its theoretical understanding. Moreover, it lays the foundation for expanding and enriching the theoretical system of the cultural resilience of tourism destinations. It also helps highlight the research direction for enhancing cultural resilience.

Keywords: cultural resilience; tourism destinations; research framework; research prospect

中图分类号: