Research on Soundscape Quality Optimization of the Grand Canal Cultural Belt Based on Soundscape Preference: A Case Study of Li Canal Cultural Corridor

doi:10.12054/lydk.bisu.245

Abstract

Abstract:

Soundscape plays an important role in heritage sites, ecological environments, and public recreational spaces. As the Grand Canal Cultural Belt (GCCB) is a multi-complex space involving cultural heritage, ecological protection, and recreational utilization, it is necessary to conduct studies on its soundscape. This study selects Li Canal Cultural Corridor and conducts a questionnaire survey to explore the pattern of people’s preferences for the soundscape of GCCB and proposes suggestions for improving the soundscape quality based on the P-F model analysis. The analysis results of 225 valid samples indicate that people’s preference for canal soundscape presents a special pattern: The unique canal sound is most preferred, followed by the sound of hustle and bustle, while the most negative sound is the disturbing noises. The preference for sounds unique to the canal culture and local features of specific canal sections is greater than that for mundane sounds, and the preference for sounds that arouse historical nostalgia is greater than that for sounds reflecting the mundane life. The qualitative analysis results indicate that the formation of this model stems from people’s need for emotional satisfaction and the construction of their canal memory. Additionally, age, local or non-local resident status, and frequency of visit all exert significant effects of varying degrees on the preference for the canal soundscape. According to the results of the canal soundscape preference model and P-F analysis, managers are recommended to further explore and reproduce the unique sounds of the canal, improve the sound of canal life, and design specific sound elements both forwardly and inversely.

Key words: the Grand Canal Cultural Belt, soundscape preference, soundscape quality, soundscape quality measurement model

摘要：

声景观对遗产地、生态环境、公共游憩空间均有重要作用，运河文化带是涉及文化遗产、生态保护、游憩利用的多重复合空间，因此研究运河文化带的声景观实属必要。本文以里运河文化长廊为案例进行问卷调查，探索人们对于运河声景观的偏好模式，并结合P-F模型分析，提出声景质量改善建议。研究结果显示：人们对于运河声景观的偏好呈现出特殊模式，最喜爱运河特征声，其次是运河生活声，最厌恶扰民声;对体现运河文化、具体河段地方特色的特征性声音的偏好程度高于对非特征性声音的偏好；对反映历史怀旧声音的偏好程度高于对反映当下生活声音的偏好；特殊偏好模式的形成源于人们对情感需求的满足和对运河记忆的建构；年龄、是否当地居民、游览频率也会对运河声景观的偏好产生不同程度的显著影响。因此，相关管理者应深挖和再现运河特征声，改善运河生活声，并对具体声音元素进行正向或负向设计。

关键词: 运河文化带, 声景偏好, 声景质量, 声景质量测评模型

CLC Number:

ZHANG Yi, CUI Jianzhou. Research on Soundscape Quality Optimization of the Grand Canal Cultural Belt Based on Soundscape Preference: A Case Study of Li Canal Cultural Corridor[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2024, 8(1): 82-103.

张一, 崔建周. 基于声景偏好的运河文化带声景质量优化研究——以里运河文化长廊为例[J]. 旅游导刊, 2024, 8(1): 82-103.

Figures/Tables 5

References 36

[1]	Axelsson Ö, Nilsson M E, Berglund B. A principal components model of soundscape perception[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2010, 128(5):2836-2846.
[2]	Bilen A O, Can Z Y. An applied soundscape approach for acoustic evaluation-compatibility with ISO 12913[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2021(180):108112.
[3]	Brown A L. A review of progress in soundscapes and an approach to soundscape planning[J]. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 2012, 17(2):73-81.
[4]	Djimantoro M I, Martokusumo W, Poerbo H W, et al. The historical soundscape analysis of Fatahillah Square,Jakarta[J]. Acoustics, 2020, 2(4):847-867.
[5]	Dong R C, Yu T S, Ma H, et al. Soundscape planning for the Xianghe segment of China’s Grand Canal based on landsenses ecology[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2016, 23(4):343-350.
[6]	Echtner C M. The semiotic paradigm:Implications for tourism research[J]. Tourism Management, 1999, 20(1):47-57.
[7]	Fang X Y, Gao T, Hedblom M, et al. Soundscape perceptions and preferences for different groups of users in urban recreational forest parks[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(4):468.
[8]	Farina A. Soundscape Ecology:Principles,Patterns,Methods and Applications[M]. Dordrecht:Springer, 2014:4,139.
[9]	Han Z H, Kang J, Meng Q. Effect of sound sequence on soundscape emotions[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2023(207):109371.
[10]	Hasegawa Y, Lau S K. A qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the impacts of COVID-19 on soundscapes:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022(844):157223.
[11]	Jiang L K, Bristow A, Kang J, et al. Ten questions concerning soundscape valuation[J]. Building and Environment, 2022(219):109231.
[12]	Kang J, Aletta F, Margaritis E, et al. A model for implementing soundscape maps in smart cities[J]. Noise Mapping, 2018, 5(1):46-59.
[13]	Kang J, Aletta F, Oberman T, et al. Supportive soundscapes are crucial for sustainable environments[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023(855):158868.
[14]	Li J, Burroughs K, Halim M F, et al. Assessing soundscape preferences and the impact of specific sounds on outdoor recreation activities using qualitative data analysis and immersive virtual environment technology[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2018(24):66-73.
[15]	Li R, Ou D Y, Pan S S. An improved service quality measurement model for soundscape assessment in urban public open spaces[J]. Indoor and Built Environment, 2021, 30(7):985-997.
[16]	Lionello M, Aletta F, Kang J. A systematic review of prediction models for the experience of urban soundscapes[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020(170):107479.
[17]	Ma K W, Mak C M, Wong H M. Effects of environmental sound quality on soundscape preference in a public urban space[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2021(171):107570.
[18]	Ou D Y, Mak C M, Pan S S. A method for assessing soundscape in urban parks based on the service quality measurement models[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2017(127):184-193.
[19]	Tse M S, Chau C K, Choy Y S, et al. Perception of urban park soundscape[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012, 131(4):2762-2771.
[20]	Wilson S, Chambers D, Johnson J. VW campervan tourists’ embodied sonic experiences[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2019(76):14-23.
[21]	Yang W, Kang J. Soundscape and sound preferences in urban squares:A case study in Sheffield[J]. Journal of Urban Design, 2005, 10(1):61-80.
[22]	Yilmazer S, Acun V. A grounded theory approach to assess indoor soundscape in historic religious spaces of Anatolian culture:A case study on Hacı Bayram Mosque[J]. Building Acoustics, 2018, 25(2):137-150.
[23]	Zou Y G, Xiao H G, Yang Y. Constructing identity in space and place:Semiotic and discourse analyses of museum tourism[J]. Tourism Management, 2022(93):104608.
[24]	邓志勇, 刘爱利, 陈昊骙. 历史文化街区声景语义的主观评价研究——基于人文地理学的视角[J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(1):35-42.
	[DENG Zhiyong, LIU Aili, CHEN Haokui. Semantic analysis for the soundscape of historical and cultural areas:An approach of human geography[J]. Human Geography, 2014, 29(1):35-42.]
[25]	丁宏, 干有成, 姚乐. 运河两岸有人家——晓庄镜头下的大运河文化带江苏段[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2019:37.
	[DING Hong, GAN Youcheng, YAO Le. Homes Along the Canal:The Culture of Grand Canal in Jiangsu Province through the lens of Xiaozhuang[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 2019:37.]
[26]	康健. 从分贝到声景指标:管理我们的声环境[J]. 工程管理年刊, 2017(7):114-125.
	[KANG Jian. From dBA to soundscape indices:Managing our sound environment[J]. Construction Management, 2017(7):114-125.]
[27]	康健, 马蕙, 谢辉, 等. 健康建筑声环境研究进展[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(4):288-299.
	[KANG Jian, MA Hui, XIE Hui, et al. Research progress on the acoustic environments of healthy buildings[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(4):288-299.]
[28]	李舒涵, 王长松. 京杭运河文化遗产空间的声音景观感知研究——以杭州大兜路历史文化街区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(11):10-15,21.
	[LI Shuhan, WANG Changsong. The sound landscape perception of the cultural heritage space of the Beijing-Hangzhou Canal:A case study of the historical district of Dadou Road,Hangzhou[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(11):10-15,21.]
[29]	刘爱利, 刘福承, 邓志勇, 等. 文化地理学视角下的声景研究及相关进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(11):1452-1461.
	[LIU Aili, LIU Fucheng, DENG Zhiyong, et al. Progress in soundscape studies from the perspective of cultural geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(11):1452-1461.]
[30]	刘爱利, 刘福承, 刘敏, 等. 国内外旅游声景研究进展[J]. 旅游学刊, 2016, 31(3):114-126.
	[LIU Aili, LIU Fucheng, LIU Min, et al. Review of soundscape studies in tourism[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2016, 31(3):114-126.]
[31]	R.穆雷·谢弗. 声景学——我们的声环境与世界的调音[M]. 邓志勇,刘爱利,译. 北京: 首都师范大学出版社, 2022.
	[R Murray Schafer R. The Soundscape:Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World[M]. DENG Zhiyong,LIU Aili,trans. Beijing: Capital Normal University Press, 2022.]
[32]	唐宁, 潘天波. 江苏大运河文化记忆场所的建设及其活化传承[J]. 南京社会科学, 2020(2):150-156.
	[TANG Ning, PAN Tianbo. Construction of cultural memory place of Jiangsu Grand Canal and its active inheritance[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2020(2):150-156.]
[33]	杨家毅. 浅析大运河(北京段)文化带的内涵[J]. 北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 15(4):28-34.
	[YANG Jiayi. On the connotation of the cultural belt of the Grand Canal in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Union University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2017, 15(4):28-34.]
[34]	张飞, 杨林生, 石勇, 等. 大运河文化带游憩空间范围及层次研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(6):80-84.
	[ZHANG Fei, YANG Linsheng, SHI Yong, et al. Recreational spatial scope and level of the grand canal cultural belt[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2019, 38(6):80-84.]
[35]	张捷. Schafer声景观理论经典著作的评析[J]. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(12):121-124.
	[ZHANG Jie. An analytic review of the Schafer’s classic work of soundscape research[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2015, 30(12):121-124.]
[36]	朱玉洁, 翁羽西, 孙丹玫, 等. 声景对自然和城市环境恢复性效益的影响[J]. 建筑科学, 2021, 37(2):63-69,76.
	[ZHU Yujie, WENG Yuxi, SUN Danmei, et al. Impact of soundscape on restorative benefits of nature and urban environment[J]. Building Science, 2021, 37(2):63-69,76.]

变量 Variable	因子1 Factor 1	因子2 Factor 2	因子3 Factor 3	共同度 Communality
水鸟鸣叫	0.85			0.81
运河水流	0.84			0.82
风吹树叶	0.84			0.83
游船行驶	0.81			0.76
寺庙钟鼓	0.80			0.77
林间鸟鸣	0.79			0.76
冬日破冰	0.73			0.68
建筑施工		0.90		0.81
马路汽车		0.84		0.78
小贩吆喝		0.74		0.70
广场舞乐		0.72		0.67
乐器演奏			0.78	0.83
闲聊娱乐			0.77	0.76
合唱歌声			0.71	0.78
游览火车			0.57	0.70
儿童玩耍			0.47	0.65
旋转后的特征值	5.70	3.36	3.04
解释方差百分比%	35.65	21.02	18.98

变量 Variable	因子1 Factor 1	因子2 Factor 2	因子3 Factor 3	共同度 Communality
水鸟鸣叫	0.85			0.81
运河水流	0.84			0.82
风吹树叶	0.84			0.83
游船行驶	0.81			0.76
寺庙钟鼓	0.80			0.77
林间鸟鸣	0.79			0.76
冬日破冰	0.73			0.68
建筑施工		0.90		0.81
马路汽车		0.84		0.78
小贩吆喝		0.74		0.70
广场舞乐		0.72		0.67
乐器演奏			0.78	0.83
闲聊娱乐			0.77	0.76
合唱歌声			0.71	0.78
游览火车			0.57	0.70
儿童玩耍			0.47	0.65
旋转后的特征值	5.70	3.36	3.04
解释方差百分比%	35.65	21.02	18.98

声音元素 Soundscape elements		偏好均值 Mean of preference	频率均值 Mean of frequency	P-F区域 P-F area	方向 Direction	声音元素 Soundscape elements		偏好均值 Mean of preference	频率 Mean of frequency	P-F区域 P-F area	方向 Direction
1	闲聊娱乐	0.25	3.18	Surplus	+	9	林间鸟鸣	0.73	3.20	Excellent	+
2	水鸟鸣叫	0.82	3.09	Excellent	+	10	风吹树叶	0.78	3.21	Excellent	+
3	乐器演奏	0.47	2.96	Excellent	+	11	冬日破冰	0.41	2.63	To-be-improved	+
4	合唱歌声	0.42	2.79	To-be-improved	+	12	运河水流	0.76	3.23	Excellent	+
5	游览火车	0.26	2.77	Low-priority	+	13	游船行驶	0.51	2.92	To-be-improved	+
6	广场舞乐	-0.07	2.76	Surplus	-	14	小贩吆喝	-0.10	2.88	Surplus	-
7	马路汽车	-0.42	2.97	To-be-improved	-	15	儿童玩耍	0.29	3.35	Surplus	+
8	建筑施工	-0.61	2.53	Excellent	-	16	寺庙钟鼓	0.68	2.90	To-be-improved	+

声音元素 Soundscape elements		偏好均值 Mean of preference	频率均值 Mean of frequency	P-F区域 P-F area	方向 Direction	声音元素 Soundscape elements		偏好均值 Mean of preference	频率 Mean of frequency	P-F区域 P-F area	方向 Direction
1	闲聊娱乐	0.25	3.18	Surplus	+	9	林间鸟鸣	0.73	3.20	Excellent	+
2	水鸟鸣叫	0.82	3.09	Excellent	+	10	风吹树叶	0.78	3.21	Excellent	+
3	乐器演奏	0.47	2.96	Excellent	+	11	冬日破冰	0.41	2.63	To-be-improved	+
4	合唱歌声	0.42	2.79	To-be-improved	+	12	运河水流	0.76	3.23	Excellent	+
5	游览火车	0.26	2.77	Low-priority	+	13	游船行驶	0.51	2.92	To-be-improved	+
6	广场舞乐	-0.07	2.76	Surplus	-	14	小贩吆喝	-0.10	2.88	Surplus	-
7	马路汽车	-0.42	2.97	To-be-improved	-	15	儿童玩耍	0.29	3.35	Surplus	+
8	建筑施工	-0.61	2.53	Excellent	-	16	寺庙钟鼓	0.68	2.90	To-be-improved	+