Tourism and Hospitality Prospects ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 73-96.DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.261

• Research Paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Threshold Effect of China’s High-quality Tourism Development on Common Prosperity

GUAN Rui1, HU Mingdi2, YANG Qiuping3, WANG Kai3()

  1. 1. College of Economy and Management, Ankang University, Ankang 725000, China
    2. College of Marxism, Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha 410205, China
    3. College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
  • Received:2023-10-23 Revised:2024-12-19 Online:2025-02-28 Published:2025-03-07

我国旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕的门槛效应研究

关锐1, 胡鸣镝2, 杨秋平3, 王凯3()   

  1. 1.安康学院经济与管理学院 陕西安康 725000
    2.湖南财政经济学院马克思主义学院 湖南长沙 410205
    3.湖南师范大学旅游学院 湖南长沙 410081
  • 通讯作者: 王凯(1969—),男,湖南新宁人,湖南师范大学旅游学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为区域旅游经济、低碳旅游,E-mail:kingviry@163.com
  • 作者简介:关锐(1999—),男,山西临汾人,安康学院经济与管理学院助教,研究方向为区域旅游规划、低碳旅游;
    胡鸣镝(1998—),男,江西九江人,湖南财政经济学院教师,研究方向为区域旅游规划;
    杨秋平(1998—),女,山东菏泽人,湖南师范大学旅游学院硕士研究生,研究方向为低碳旅游。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“武陵山区旅游业高质量发展促进共同富裕的机理及长效机制研究”(22BJL059)

Abstract:

High-quality development is crucial for achieving Common Prosperity for all individuals. In this study, first, the level of high-quality development of tourism and level of Common Prosperity are evaluated based on the modified entropy method. Second, the threshold effect of high-quality tourism development on Common Prosperity is investigated via the threshold regression model. The results show that: (1) There is a double threshold effect of tourism quality development on Common Prosperity with a consistently positive influence when the urban development level is used as the threshold variable. However, the influence in eastern China is always negative and exhibits an inverted N-type change trend. Moreover, the central and western regions did not pass the threshold effect test. (2) A single threshold value of tourism quality development on Common Prosperity when the level of tourism development is used as the threshold variable in the entire country as well as in the eastern region. (3) When the level of economic development is used as the threshold variable, the influence of high-quality tourism development on Common Prosperity exhibits a U-shaped trend. In the central and eastern regions, high-quality tourism development has a positive effect on Common Prosperity, whereas the western regions show a significant negative effect.

Key words: high-quality development, high-quality development of tourism, Common Prosperity, panel threshold model, threshold effect

摘要:

高质量发展是促进共同富裕的重要前提和基础,本文首先利用改进后的熵值法分别测算我国省域的旅游业高质量发展与共同富裕水平,接着采用门槛回归模型探讨旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕的门槛效应。结果表明:(1)以城镇化水平为门槛变量时,在全国范围内,旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕存在双重门槛效应且影响始终为正,东部地区旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕的影响始终为负且随着城镇化水平提高呈现N形变动趋势,中西部地区则未通过门槛效应检验。(2)以旅游业发展水平作为门槛变量时,全国以及东部地区的旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕存在单门槛效应,而中西部地区的旅游业高质量发展并未通过门槛效应检验。(3)以经济发展水平为门槛变量时,我国整体的旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕的影响呈现出U形变动态势,东部地区的旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕的影响为负且随经济发展而减弱,中部地区的旅游业高质量发展对共同富裕起到促进作用,而西部地区则呈现出显著的负向影响。

关键词: 高质量发展, 旅游业高质量发展, 共同富裕, 面板门槛模型, 门槛效应

CLC Number: