Tourism and Hospitality Prospects ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 1-20.DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.282
• Research Paper • Next Articles
Received:
2024-01-22
Revised:
2024-11-18
Online:
2025-02-28
Published:
2025-03-07
作者简介:
方世敏(1964— ),男,湖南岳阳人,博士,湘潭大学商学院教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为区域旅游规划开发与景区管理、休闲农业,E-mail: fangshimi555@126.com;基金资助:
CLC Number:
FANG Shimin, CUI Aolin. Impacts of Tourists’ Involvement on Place Attachment:Mediated by Perceived Value[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2025, 9(1): 1-20.
方世敏, 崔澳琳. 旅游涉入对游客地方依恋的影响——以感知价值为中介[J]. 旅游导刊, 2025, 9(1): 1-20.
变量 Variable | 序号 Number | 题项 Item | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | A1 | 对我来说,到长沙旅游是很有意义且重要的事情 | McIntyre & Pigram( 李淑贤( 张秦、郭英之( |
A2 | 我对到长沙旅游很感兴趣 | ||
A3 | 到长沙旅游给我带来了很多乐趣 | ||
A4 | 来长沙旅游让我感觉心情放松愉悦,能忘却烦恼 | ||
自我表现 Self-expression | B1 | 在长沙游玩的过程中,我可以不受约束地做自己,尽情地展现自己 | |
B2 | 来长沙旅游可以展示我的很多方面,能反映出我的个性、旅游风格和品位 | ||
B3 | 来长沙旅游可以真正地表现自我,让他人更加了解我 | ||
B4 | 来长沙旅游会影响甚至改变别人对我的看法 | ||
中心性 Centrality | C1 | 除了到长沙游玩,我也乐于关注长沙旅游的相关信息 | |
C2 | 与他人聊天时,我会经常提到在长沙游览的经历或与长沙有关的其他事情 | ||
C3 | 来长沙旅游的过程中,我结识了一些朋友 | ||
C4 | 长沙与我的日常生活有密切的关系 | ||
感知价值Perceived value | D1 | 去长沙游玩,我得到了质量合理的服务 | Chen&Tsai( 郭安禧、 黄福才、 黎微( |
D2 | 去长沙游玩,我支付了合理的价格 | ||
D3 | 去长沙游玩,与我得到的相比,花费的金钱和时间是值得的 | ||
D4 | 总体来说,本次到长沙游玩、消费,很值得 | ||
地方依赖Place dependence | F1 | 我十分迷恋长沙的自然、人文风光及美食等 | Williams,Patterson& Roggenbuck,et al.( 张秦、郭英之( 吕丽辉、 陈潇( |
F2 | 相比于其他地方,我更喜欢在长沙游玩 | ||
F3 | 相比于其他地方,长沙让我能更好地休闲和享受 | ||
F4 | 相比于其他地方,长沙对我来说是特别的,在这里的旅游体验是别的地方不能给予的 | ||
F5 | 相比于其他地方,长沙的旅游设施更能满足我的要求 | ||
地方认同Place identity | G1 | 对我而言,长沙的人和事物有着特殊的意义和情感 | |
G2 | 我对长沙具有很强的依恋感,一想到我要离开长沙, 我感到依依不舍 | ||
G3 | 如果可以,我愿意在长沙待更长的时间 | ||
G4 | 在长沙游玩,我能更好地认识自我 | ||
G5 | 我对长沙具有很强的认同感,我很认同这里的生活方式,当我待在这里的时候,我觉得我就是这里的一分子 |
Tab. 1 scale design
变量 Variable | 序号 Number | 题项 Item | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | A1 | 对我来说,到长沙旅游是很有意义且重要的事情 | McIntyre & Pigram( 李淑贤( 张秦、郭英之( |
A2 | 我对到长沙旅游很感兴趣 | ||
A3 | 到长沙旅游给我带来了很多乐趣 | ||
A4 | 来长沙旅游让我感觉心情放松愉悦,能忘却烦恼 | ||
自我表现 Self-expression | B1 | 在长沙游玩的过程中,我可以不受约束地做自己,尽情地展现自己 | |
B2 | 来长沙旅游可以展示我的很多方面,能反映出我的个性、旅游风格和品位 | ||
B3 | 来长沙旅游可以真正地表现自我,让他人更加了解我 | ||
B4 | 来长沙旅游会影响甚至改变别人对我的看法 | ||
中心性 Centrality | C1 | 除了到长沙游玩,我也乐于关注长沙旅游的相关信息 | |
C2 | 与他人聊天时,我会经常提到在长沙游览的经历或与长沙有关的其他事情 | ||
C3 | 来长沙旅游的过程中,我结识了一些朋友 | ||
C4 | 长沙与我的日常生活有密切的关系 | ||
感知价值Perceived value | D1 | 去长沙游玩,我得到了质量合理的服务 | Chen&Tsai( 郭安禧、 黄福才、 黎微( |
D2 | 去长沙游玩,我支付了合理的价格 | ||
D3 | 去长沙游玩,与我得到的相比,花费的金钱和时间是值得的 | ||
D4 | 总体来说,本次到长沙游玩、消费,很值得 | ||
地方依赖Place dependence | F1 | 我十分迷恋长沙的自然、人文风光及美食等 | Williams,Patterson& Roggenbuck,et al.( 张秦、郭英之( 吕丽辉、 陈潇( |
F2 | 相比于其他地方,我更喜欢在长沙游玩 | ||
F3 | 相比于其他地方,长沙让我能更好地休闲和享受 | ||
F4 | 相比于其他地方,长沙对我来说是特别的,在这里的旅游体验是别的地方不能给予的 | ||
F5 | 相比于其他地方,长沙的旅游设施更能满足我的要求 | ||
地方认同Place identity | G1 | 对我而言,长沙的人和事物有着特殊的意义和情感 | |
G2 | 我对长沙具有很强的依恋感,一想到我要离开长沙, 我感到依依不舍 | ||
G3 | 如果可以,我愿意在长沙待更长的时间 | ||
G4 | 在长沙游玩,我能更好地认识自我 | ||
G5 | 我对长沙具有很强的认同感,我很认同这里的生活方式,当我待在这里的时候,我觉得我就是这里的一分子 |
变量 Variable | 分类 Category | 频次 Frequency | 占比(%) Proportion |
---|---|---|---|
性别 Gender | 男 | 247 | 45.0 |
女 | 302 | 55.0 | |
年龄 Age | 18岁及以下 | 34 | 6.2 |
19~25岁 | 213 | 38.8 | |
26~35岁 | 153 | 27.9 | |
36~45岁 | 102 | 18.6 | |
46岁及以上 | 47 | 8.5 | |
受教育程度 Educational background | 高中/中专及以下 | 74 | 13.5 |
大专 | 106 | 19.3 | |
本科 | 243 | 44.4 | |
硕士及以上 | 125 | 22.8 | |
月均收入 Average monthly income | 2000元及以下 | 178 | 32.4 |
2001~5000元 | 190 | 34.6 | |
5001~8000元 | 119 | 21.7 | |
8001元及以上 | 62 | 11.3 |
Tab. 2 Demographic of the sample
变量 Variable | 分类 Category | 频次 Frequency | 占比(%) Proportion |
---|---|---|---|
性别 Gender | 男 | 247 | 45.0 |
女 | 302 | 55.0 | |
年龄 Age | 18岁及以下 | 34 | 6.2 |
19~25岁 | 213 | 38.8 | |
26~35岁 | 153 | 27.9 | |
36~45岁 | 102 | 18.6 | |
46岁及以上 | 47 | 8.5 | |
受教育程度 Educational background | 高中/中专及以下 | 74 | 13.5 |
大专 | 106 | 19.3 | |
本科 | 243 | 44.4 | |
硕士及以上 | 125 | 22.8 | |
月均收入 Average monthly income | 2000元及以下 | 178 | 32.4 |
2001~5000元 | 190 | 34.6 | |
5001~8000元 | 119 | 21.7 | |
8001元及以上 | 62 | 11.3 |
变量 Variable | 题项 Item | 相关程度 CITC | (项目刪除) Cronbach’s α | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | A1 | 0.618 | 0.775 | 0.815 |
A2 | 0.624 | 0.773 | ||
A3 | 0.667 | 0.753 | ||
A4 | 0.631 | 0.770 | ||
自我表现 Self-expression | B1 | 0.624 | 0.787 | 0.823 |
B2 | 0.664 | 0.768 | ||
B3 | 0.663 | 0.769 | ||
B4 | 0.634 | 0.782 | ||
中心性 Centrality | C1 | 0.653 | 0.785 | 0.829 |
C2 | 0.644 | 0.789 | ||
C3 | 0.660 | 0.782 | ||
C4 | 0.666 | 0.780 | ||
感知价值 Perceived value | D1 | 0.639 | 0.800 | 0.833 |
D2 | 0.660 | 0.791 | ||
D3 | 0.699 | 0.773 | ||
D4 | 0.655 | 0.793 | ||
地方依赖 Place dependence | F1 | 0.662 | 0.835 | 0.862 |
F2 | 0.686 | 0.837 | ||
F3 | 0.723 | 0.830 | ||
F4 | 0.687 | 0.839 | ||
F5 | 0.685 | 0.837 | ||
地方认同 Place identity | G1 | 0.690 | 0.851 | 0.871 |
G2 | 0.732 | 0.844 | ||
G3 | 0.700 | 0.849 | ||
G4 | 0.697 | 0.841 | ||
G5 | 0.717 | 0.847 |
Tab. 3 Results of reliability analysis
变量 Variable | 题项 Item | 相关程度 CITC | (项目刪除) Cronbach’s α | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | A1 | 0.618 | 0.775 | 0.815 |
A2 | 0.624 | 0.773 | ||
A3 | 0.667 | 0.753 | ||
A4 | 0.631 | 0.770 | ||
自我表现 Self-expression | B1 | 0.624 | 0.787 | 0.823 |
B2 | 0.664 | 0.768 | ||
B3 | 0.663 | 0.769 | ||
B4 | 0.634 | 0.782 | ||
中心性 Centrality | C1 | 0.653 | 0.785 | 0.829 |
C2 | 0.644 | 0.789 | ||
C3 | 0.660 | 0.782 | ||
C4 | 0.666 | 0.780 | ||
感知价值 Perceived value | D1 | 0.639 | 0.800 | 0.833 |
D2 | 0.660 | 0.791 | ||
D3 | 0.699 | 0.773 | ||
D4 | 0.655 | 0.793 | ||
地方依赖 Place dependence | F1 | 0.662 | 0.835 | 0.862 |
F2 | 0.686 | 0.837 | ||
F3 | 0.723 | 0.830 | ||
F4 | 0.687 | 0.839 | ||
F5 | 0.685 | 0.837 | ||
地方认同 Place identity | G1 | 0.690 | 0.851 | 0.871 |
G2 | 0.732 | 0.844 | ||
G3 | 0.700 | 0.849 | ||
G4 | 0.697 | 0.841 | ||
G5 | 0.717 | 0.847 |
变量 Variable | 题项 Item | 标准化因子负荷 Standardized factor loading | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | A4 | 0.737 | 0.531 | 0.819 |
A3 | 0.760 | |||
A2 | 0.703 | |||
A1 | 0.712 | |||
自我表现 Self-expression | B4 | 0.696 | 0.537 | 0.823 |
B3 | 0.740 | |||
B2 | 0.769 | |||
B1 | 0.725 | |||
中心性 Centrality | C4 | 0.758 | 0.548 | 0.829 |
C3 | 0.738 | |||
C2 | 0.728 | |||
C1 | 0.736 | |||
感知价值 Perceived value | D4 | 0.740 | 0.557 | 0.834 |
D3 | 0.782 | |||
D2 | 0.714 | |||
D1 | 0.747 | |||
地方依赖 Place dependence | F5 | 0.753 | 0.566 | 0.867 |
F4 | 0.753 | |||
F3 | 0.786 | |||
F2 | 0.746 | |||
F1 | 0.723 | |||
地方认同 Place identity | G5 | 0.773 | 0.591 | 0.878 |
G4 | 0.760 | |||
G3 | 0.750 | |||
G2 | 0.809 | |||
G1 | 0.751 |
Tab. 4 Results of confirmatory factor analysis
变量 Variable | 题项 Item | 标准化因子负荷 Standardized factor loading | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | A4 | 0.737 | 0.531 | 0.819 |
A3 | 0.760 | |||
A2 | 0.703 | |||
A1 | 0.712 | |||
自我表现 Self-expression | B4 | 0.696 | 0.537 | 0.823 |
B3 | 0.740 | |||
B2 | 0.769 | |||
B1 | 0.725 | |||
中心性 Centrality | C4 | 0.758 | 0.548 | 0.829 |
C3 | 0.738 | |||
C2 | 0.728 | |||
C1 | 0.736 | |||
感知价值 Perceived value | D4 | 0.740 | 0.557 | 0.834 |
D3 | 0.782 | |||
D2 | 0.714 | |||
D1 | 0.747 | |||
地方依赖 Place dependence | F5 | 0.753 | 0.566 | 0.867 |
F4 | 0.753 | |||
F3 | 0.786 | |||
F2 | 0.746 | |||
F1 | 0.723 | |||
地方认同 Place identity | G5 | 0.773 | 0.591 | 0.878 |
G4 | 0.760 | |||
G3 | 0.750 | |||
G2 | 0.809 | |||
G1 | 0.751 |
变量 Variable | 吸引力 Attraction | 自我表现 Self-expression | 中心性 Centrality | 感知价值 Perceived value | 地方依赖 Place dependence | 地方认同 Place identity | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | 0.531 | ||||||
自我表现 Self-expression | 0.544 | 0.537 | |||||
中心性 Centrality | 0.466 | 0.524 | 0.548 | ||||
感知价值 Perceived value | 0.664 | 0.506 | 0.491 | 0.557 | |||
地方依赖 Place dependence | 0.381 | 0.563 | 0.584 | 0.630 | 0.566 | ||
地方认同 Place identity | 0.657 | 0.609 | 0.599 | 0.514 | 0.714 | 0.591 | |
AVE平方根 | 0.729 | 0.733 | 0.740 | 0.746 | 0.752 | 0.769 |
Tab. 5 Results of discriminant validity test
变量 Variable | 吸引力 Attraction | 自我表现 Self-expression | 中心性 Centrality | 感知价值 Perceived value | 地方依赖 Place dependence | 地方认同 Place identity | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
吸引力 Attraction | 0.531 | ||||||
自我表现 Self-expression | 0.544 | 0.537 | |||||
中心性 Centrality | 0.466 | 0.524 | 0.548 | ||||
感知价值 Perceived value | 0.664 | 0.506 | 0.491 | 0.557 | |||
地方依赖 Place dependence | 0.381 | 0.563 | 0.584 | 0.630 | 0.566 | ||
地方认同 Place identity | 0.657 | 0.609 | 0.599 | 0.514 | 0.714 | 0.591 | |
AVE平方根 | 0.729 | 0.733 | 0.740 | 0.746 | 0.752 | 0.769 |
假设 Hypothesis | 路径 Path | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p | 验证结果 Test result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1a | 吸引力→地方依赖 | 0.113 | 0.049 | 1.984 | * | 支持 |
H1b | 自我表现→地方依赖 | 0.271 | 0.039 | 5.722 | *** | 支持 |
H1c | 中心性→地方依赖 | 0.332 | 0.038 | 6.770 | *** | 支持 |
H2a | 吸引力→地方认同 | -0.105 | 0.058 | -1.872 | 0.067 | 不支持 |
H2b | 自我表现→地方认同 | 0.411 | 0.051 | 8.202 | *** | 支持 |
H2c | 中心性→地方认同 | 0.394 | 0.047 | 7.976 | *** | 支持 |
H3a | 吸引力→感知价值 | 0.548 | 0.051 | 9.743 | *** | 支持 |
H3b | 自我表现→感知价值 | 0.201 | 0.042 | 4.316 | *** | 支持 |
H3c | 中心性→感知价值 | 0.242 | 0.039 | 5.171 | *** | 支持 |
H4 | 感知价值→地方依赖 | 0.356 | 0.061 | 5.447 | *** | 支持 |
H5 | 感知价值→地方认同 | 0.268 | 0.071 | 4.283 | *** | 支持 |
Tab. 6 Results of path test
假设 Hypothesis | 路径 Path | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p | 验证结果 Test result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1a | 吸引力→地方依赖 | 0.113 | 0.049 | 1.984 | * | 支持 |
H1b | 自我表现→地方依赖 | 0.271 | 0.039 | 5.722 | *** | 支持 |
H1c | 中心性→地方依赖 | 0.332 | 0.038 | 6.770 | *** | 支持 |
H2a | 吸引力→地方认同 | -0.105 | 0.058 | -1.872 | 0.067 | 不支持 |
H2b | 自我表现→地方认同 | 0.411 | 0.051 | 8.202 | *** | 支持 |
H2c | 中心性→地方认同 | 0.394 | 0.047 | 7.976 | *** | 支持 |
H3a | 吸引力→感知价值 | 0.548 | 0.051 | 9.743 | *** | 支持 |
H3b | 自我表现→感知价值 | 0.201 | 0.042 | 4.316 | *** | 支持 |
H3c | 中心性→感知价值 | 0.242 | 0.039 | 5.171 | *** | 支持 |
H4 | 感知价值→地方依赖 | 0.356 | 0.061 | 5.447 | *** | 支持 |
H5 | 感知价值→地方认同 | 0.268 | 0.071 | 4.283 | *** | 支持 |
假设 Hypothesis | 路径 Path | 效应值 Effect | 系数乘积检验 | Bias-Corrected 95%CI | 结果 Result | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SE | Z值 | Lower | Upper | p | ||||
H6a | 吸引力→感知价值→ 地方依赖 | 0.195 | 0.067 | 2.910 | 0.082 | 0.354 | *** | 支持 |
H6b | 自我表现→感知价值→地方依赖 | 0.072 | 0.031 | 2.323 | 0.026 | 0.154 | *** | 支持 |
H6c | 中心性→感知价值→ 地方依赖 | 0.086 | 0.030 | 2.867 | 0.039 | 0.164 | *** | 支持 |
H7a | 吸引力→感知价值→ 地方认同 | 0.147 | 0.065 | 2.262 | 0.042 | 0.300 | ** | 支持 |
H7b | 自我表现→感知价值→地方认同 | 0.054 | 0.025 | 2.160 | 0.018 | 0.123 | ** | 支持 |
H7c | 中心性→感知价值→ 地方认同 | 0.065 | 0.028 | 2.321 | 0.022 | 0.138 | ** | 支持 |
Tab. 7 Results of mediating effect test
假设 Hypothesis | 路径 Path | 效应值 Effect | 系数乘积检验 | Bias-Corrected 95%CI | 结果 Result | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SE | Z值 | Lower | Upper | p | ||||
H6a | 吸引力→感知价值→ 地方依赖 | 0.195 | 0.067 | 2.910 | 0.082 | 0.354 | *** | 支持 |
H6b | 自我表现→感知价值→地方依赖 | 0.072 | 0.031 | 2.323 | 0.026 | 0.154 | *** | 支持 |
H6c | 中心性→感知价值→ 地方依赖 | 0.086 | 0.030 | 2.867 | 0.039 | 0.164 | *** | 支持 |
H7a | 吸引力→感知价值→ 地方认同 | 0.147 | 0.065 | 2.262 | 0.042 | 0.300 | ** | 支持 |
H7b | 自我表现→感知价值→地方认同 | 0.054 | 0.025 | 2.160 | 0.018 | 0.123 | ** | 支持 |
H7c | 中心性→感知价值→ 地方认同 | 0.065 | 0.028 | 2.321 | 0.022 | 0.138 | ** | 支持 |
[1] | Bricker K S, Kerstetter D L. Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists[J]. Leisure Sciences, 2000, 22(4): 233-257. |
[2] | Buonincontri P, Marasco A, Ramkissoon H. Visitors’ experience, place attachment and sustainable behaviour at cultural heritage sites: A conceptual framework[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(7): 1112. |
[3] | Chen C F, Tsai D C. How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions?[J]. Tourism Management, 2007, 28(4): 1115-1122. |
[4] | Hammitt W E, Backlund E A, Bixler R D. Place bonding for recreation places: Conceptual and empirical development[J]. Leisure Studies, 2006, 25(1): 17-41. |
[5] | Havitz M E, Dimanche F. Propositions for testing the involvement construct in recreational and tourism contexts[J]. Leisure Sciences, 1990, 12(2): 179-195. |
[6] | Kyle G, Bricker K, Graefe A, et al. An examination of recreationists’ relationships with activities and settings[J]. Leisure Sciences, 2004, 26(2): 123-142. |
[7] | Kyle G, Graefe A, Manning R, et al. Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 24(2): 213-225. |
[8] | Laurent G, Kapferer J N. Measuring consumer involvement profiles[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1985, 22(1): 41-53. |
[9] | Mcintyre N, Pigram J J. Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers[J]. Leisure Sciences, 1992, 14(1): 3-15. |
[10] | Moore R L, Graefe A R. Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users[J]. Leisure Sciences, 1994, 16(1): 17-31. |
[11] | Sherif M, Cantril H. The Psychology of Ego-Involvements: Social Attitudes and Identifications[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1947. |
[12] | Sweeney J C, Soutar G N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2001, 77(2): 203-220. |
[13] | Tuan Y F. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974. |
[14] | Williams D R, Patterson M E, Roggenbuck J W, et al. Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place[J]. Leisure Sciences, 1992, 14(1): 29-46. |
[15] | Williams D R, Roggenbuck J W. Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results[C]// NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research. San Antonio: University of Texas Press, 1989. |
[16] | Woodruff R B. Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1997, 25(2): 139-153. |
[17] | Zaichkowsky J L. Measuring the involvement construct[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1985, 12(3): 341-352. |
[18] | Zeithaml V A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1988, 52(3): 2-22. |
[19] | 董思妤. 清明上河园景区游客涉入度、感知价值对满意度的影响研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2023. |
[DONG Siyu. Study on the Influence of Tourist Involvement and Perceived Value on Satisfaction in Qingming Shanghe Park Scenic Spot[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2023.] | |
[20] | 郭安禧, 黄福才, 黎微. 重游意向最关键驱动因素的实证研究--感知价值、感知吸引力、游客满意和游客信任的比较[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2013(1): 38-46. |
[GUO Anxi, HUANG Fucai, LI Wei. Empirical study on the key driving factors of revisit intention: A comparison of perceived value, perceived attractiveness, tourist satisfaction, and tourist trust[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2013(1): 38-46.] | |
[21] | 何琪敏, 谈国新. 文化生态保护区游客非遗先前知识、感知价值与行为影响机制研究[J]. 旅游科学, 2023, 37(5): 98-119. |
[HE Qimin, TAN Guoxin. A study on tourists’ prior knowledge, perceptions and behaviors in culture ecology protection area tourism[J]. Tourism Science, 2023, 37(5): 98-119.] | |
[22] | 贺雅娟. 工业遗产地旅游涉入、游客感知价值与满意度关系研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023. |
[HE Yajuan. Research on the Relationship among Industrial Heritage Tourism Involvement, Tourist Perceived Value and Satisfaction[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2023.] | |
[23] | 胡娟. 旅游涉入、感知价值与体验质量关系研究--以东湖生态旅游风景区为例[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学, 2019. |
[HU Juan. A Study on the Relationship Among Tourism Involvement, Perceived Value and Experience Quality: A Case Study of Donghu Ecotourism Scenic Area[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University, 2019.] | |
[24] | 黄向, 保继刚, Geoffrey W. 场所依赖(place attachment): 一种游憩行为现象的研究框架[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(9): 19-24. |
[HUANG Xiang, BAO Jigang, Geoffrey W. Place attachment: A conceptual framework for understanding recreational behavior[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2006, 21(9): 19-24.] | |
[25] | 黄颖华, 黄福才. 旅游者感知价值模型、测度与实证研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2007, 22(8): 42-47. |
[HUANG Yinghua, HUANG Fucai. Tourists’ perceived value model and its measurement: An empirical study[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2007, 22(8): 42-47.] | |
[26] | 李淑贤. 旅游涉入、感知价值对满意度的影响研究--以历史文化类景区为例[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2019. |
[LI Shuxian. Study on the Impact of Tourism Involvement and Perceived Value on Satisfaction: A Case Study of Historic and Cultural Scenic Sports[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2019.] | |
[27] | 李文兵, 张宏梅. 古村落游客感知价值概念模型与实证研究--以张谷英村为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2010, 24(2): 55-63. |
[LI Wenbing, ZHANG Hongmei. An empirical study of tourist perceived value model of ancient villages: A case study on Zhangguying village[J]. Tourism Science, 2010, 24(2): 55-63.] | |
[28] | 陆相林, 孙中伟. 旅游涉入、满意度、地方依恋作用机制研究--以西柏坡红色游客为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(7): 183-188. |
[LU Xianglin, SUN Zhongwei. Mechanism of red tourist’s involvement, satisfaction and local attachment-A case study of Xibaipo Red Tourism Scenic Area[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(7): 183-188.] | |
[29] | 吕丽辉, 陈潇. 感知价值与地方依恋对游客亲环境行为的影响研究--以杭州径山风景区为例[J]. 信息与管理研究, 2022, 7(S2): 46-58. |
[LYU Lihui, CHEN Xiao. Impact of perceived value and place attachment on tourists’ pro-environmental behavior: A case study of Jingshan Scenic Area in Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Information and Management, 2022, 7(S2): 46-58.] | |
[30] | 马向阳, 杨颂, 汪波. 大陆游客涉入度与文化认同对台湾旅游目的地形象的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(12): 2394-2403. |
[MA Xiangyang, YANG Song, WANG Bo. Effects of involvement and cultural identity of mainland tourists on the destination image of Taiwan[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(12): 2394-2403.] | |
[31] | 苏明明, 王梦晗, 王欣然, 等. 国家文化公园游憩涉入、地方依恋与旅游者保护行为的关系研究--以大运河(北京段)为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(12): 162-171. |
[SU Mingming, WANG Menghan, WANG Xinran, et al. Interactions between recreational involvements, place attachment and tourist protective behaviors in national cultural parks: A case of the Grand Canal Beijing[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(12): 162-171.] | |
[32] | 王坤, 黄震方, 方叶林, 等. 文化旅游区游客涉入对地方依恋的影响测评[J]. 人文地理, 2013, 28(3): 135-141. |
[WANG Kun, HUANG Zhenfang, FANG Yelin, et al. Impacts of tourists’involvement on place attachment in cultural tourist attractions[J]. Human Geography, 2013, 28(3): 135-141.] | |
[33] | 吴志才, 王博文, 刘家熳. 居民绿道休闲涉入、忠诚度对环境责任行为影响机制--以广州市增城绿道为例[J]. 热带地理, 2023, 43(5): 959-970. |
[WU Zhicai, WANG Bowen, LIU Jiaman. Relationship between recreational greenway involvement and residents’ loyalty and environmental-responsibility behavior: A case study of Zengcheng Greenway, Guangzhou[J]. Tropical Geography, 2023, 43(5): 959-970.] | |
[34] | 谢涤湘, 谢晓亮, 兰妍, 等. 老年人的休闲涉入与地方依恋--基于广州城市公园的实证研究[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(4): 692-701. |
[XIE Dixiang, XIE Xiaoliang, LAN Yan, et al. Leisure involvement and place attachment among the elderly: An empirical study of urban parks in Guangzhou[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(4): 692-701.] | |
[35] | 张秦, 郭英之. 民族文化村寨旅游涉入、地方依恋与忠诚度的关系机理研究[J]. 泰山学院学报, 2022, 44(1): 41-51. |
[ZHANG Qin, GUO Yingzhi. A study on the relationship mechanism between tourism involvement, local attachment and loyalty in ethnic cultural villages[J]. Journal of Taishan University, 2022, 44(1): 41-51.] | |
[36] | 张巧珍, 戴永务, 易祥发. 基于经营者和消费者感知的茶庄园生态系统文化服务价值研究--以福建省安溪县国心绿谷茶庄园为例[J]. 林业经济, 2023, 45(2): 76-96. |
[ZHANG Qiaozhen, DAI Yongwu, YI Xiangfa. Research on cultural ecosystem services value of tea estate ecosystem based on the perception of operators and consumers-Taking Guoxin Green Valley Tea Estate in Anxi County, Fujian Province as an example[J]. Forestry Economics, 2023, 45(2): 76-96.] | |
[37] | 张婷, 刘晶岚, 丛丽, 等. 感知价值、地方依恋对游客环境责任行为的影响--以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(6): 202-208. |
[ZHANG Ting, LIU Jinglan, CONG Li, et al. Influence of perception value and place attachment on visitors’ environmental responsibility behavior-A case of Beijing Olympic Forest Park[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(6): 202-208.] | |
[38] | 赵梦瑶, 文诗琪, 韩圆圆, 等. 博物馆文创产品涉入度对消费意愿的影响: 价值感知的中介作用[J]. 全国流通经济, 2023(12): 32-35. |
[ZHAO Mengyao, WEN Shiqi, HAN Yuanyuan, et al. The impact of museum cultural and creative product involvement on consumer willingness: The mediating role of value perception[J]. China Circulation Economy, 2023(12): 32-35.] |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||