微信公众号

编辑部微信号

旅游导刊, 2020, 4(5): 40-59 DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.154

研究论文

彝族火把节对社区成员族群认同的影响——基于多族群认同测量(MEIM)的运用

陶长江

四川农业大学旅游学院 四川成都 611830

Research on the Influence of the Yi Torch Festival on the Ethnic Identity of Community Members : Based on the Application of the Multi-group Ethnic Identity Measure

TAO Changjiang

College of Tourism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China

收稿日期: 2020-01-13   修回日期: 2020-08-27   网络出版日期: 2020-10-30

基金资助: 本研究受四川省旅游业青年专家专项课题“旅游节庆对族群认同影响研究——以凉山彝族火把节为例”资助项目编号(SCTYETP2016L37)

Received: 2020-01-13   Revised: 2020-08-27   Online: 2020-10-30

作者简介 About authors

陶长江(1982—),男,重庆潼南人,四川农业大学副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:残障旅游、节事旅游、乡村旅游。E-mail:taocj82@163.com

摘要

族群认同是社会学的重要研究课题,但鲜有研究关注民族节庆对社区成员族群认同的影响。研究将测量工具多族群认同测量(MEIM)引入节庆研究,运用探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析和多元方差分析,对参加凉山彝族自治州民间火把节的社区居民进行实证研究,研究表明:(1)MEIM在民族节庆研究领域存在族群认同承诺和族群认同探索两个维度,且具有测量稳定性;(2)社区节庆旅游发展程度负向影响成员族群认同承诺;(3)社区成员参与民族节庆的积极性和强度正向影响族群认同,即经常参加火把节的成员在族群认同承诺和探索方面均高于偶然参加者,参加火把节具体活动项目的社区成员在族群认同探索上明显高于观看者;(4)社区成员的性别和受教育程度显著影响族群认同,即彝族男性的族群认同承诺和探索高于女性,社区成员受教育程度对族群认同承诺的影响呈现“U”形。

关键词: 族群认同; 多族群认同测量; 彝族火把节

Abstract

This study explores factors influencing community members’ ethnic identity in relation to festivals and depicts the differences. The Multi-group Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) in the form of a questionnaire survey is conducted on the Yi ethnic community members attending the Yi Torch Festival in Sichuan Province, China. This study employs quantitative methods, including exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and multivariate variance analysis. The results show that the ethnic identity of festival attendees is reflected in two dimensions: ethnic identity commitment and ethnic identity exploration. Moreover, while the level of community tourism development is negatively correlated with members’ ethnic identity commitment, there is a positive correlation between the improvement of ethnic groups and their enthusiasm for and frequency of participating in community ethnic festivals. There is no clear difference in ethnic identity commitment between the festival performers and the festival spectators. However, as active participants of the festival, performers score much higher on ethnic identity exploration than spectators. Meanwhile, frequent participants exhibit greater levels of ethnic identity commitment and exploration than occasional participants. Gender and the level of education also play a vital role in personal ethnic identity. In comparison to the Yi females, the Yi males have higher ethnic identity commitment and exploration, while the educational level also affects the degree of ethnic identity commitment in a U-shaped pattern. This study is the first study applying MEIM in festival research and demonstrates the applicability of the MEIM scale in studying ethnic festivals.

Keywords: Ethnic Identity; the Multi-group Ethnic Identity Measure; the Yi Torch Festival

PDF (1392KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

陶长江. 彝族火把节对社区成员族群认同的影响——基于多族群认同测量(MEIM)的运用[J]. 旅游导刊, 2020, 4(5): 40-59 DOI:10.12054/lydk.bisu.154

TAO Changjiang. Research on the Influence of the Yi Torch Festival on the Ethnic Identity of Community Members : Based on the Application of the Multi-group Ethnic Identity Measure[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2020, 4(5): 40-59 DOI:10.12054/lydk.bisu.154

节庆是神圣或原始的庆祝时刻(Falassi,1987),是分享价值、思想、认同以及连续性的庆祝活动(Getz,2010),这些庆祝活动包括大型活动、有特色的表演和竞赛活动(Van Winkle,Woosnam & Mohammed,2013)。举办节庆可以产生显著的经济、社会文化效益(Yürük,Akyol & Şimşek,2017),以往研究已证实节庆对社区的经济影响(Crompton,2006;Rivera,Hara & Kock,2008;Andersson,Armbrecht & Lundberg,2012),如节庆中观众的消费会给当地居民和经济部门带来益处(Tohmo,2005),节庆在促进主办社区的经济繁荣方面起着重要作用(Saayman & Rossouw,2011;Diedering & Kwiatkowski,2015)。也有研究人员提出,节庆影响研究应该从关注经济效益的传统底线(bottom-line)模型转变为同时关注环境和社会文化影响的三重底线(triple-bottom-line)模型(Hede,2007;Woosnam,Jiang & Van Winkle,2016)。Getz(2010)认为,节庆的社会文化影响是节庆研究领域的3条主线之一,也是需要给予更多关注的研究方向(Mair & Whitford,2013),而节庆在族群认同建构中的作用就是节庆社会文化影响研究中的一个重要问题(Getz,2010)。族群认同(Ethnic Identity,EI)是个体作为族群成员的自我认同,它反映出个体对于整个族群的归属感和态度(Phinney,1990)。尤其对少数民族成员而言,族群认同是一个重要的个体特性(Phinney,1992)。为准确测量族群认同,Phinney(1992) ,Roberts、Phinney和Masse等(1999)提出了一个测量工具——多族群认同测量(Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure,MEIM)量表,被广泛运用于族群研究领域(Worrell,Conyers & Mpofu,et al.,2006;Yoon,2011;Burrow-Sanchez,2014;Sarno & Mohr,2016)。

以往关于节庆与族群认同的研究,学者多通过质性研究方法说明节庆活动本身(Cervone,1998;Kaplan,Higdon & Crago,et al.,2004;Deagon,2008;Zeitler,2009)会影响社区居民的族群认同,缺少用定量方法来探索具体影响程度的研究。社区成员作为活动的表演者或观看者参与节庆(Amini & Safian,2013),其参与程度会对族群认同产生怎样的影响?虽然已有研究表明旅游者涉入程度会影响社区居民的族群认同(孙九霞,2010),但在旅游节庆发展程度不同的社区,是否有类似结论?而参与节庆的社区成员的个体特征(如年龄、性别、受教育程度等)又是如何影响族群认同的?基于此,本研究将MEIM引入节庆研究,以参与四川凉山彝族民间火把节的社区居民为研究对象,采用定量研究方法,验证社区成员参与火把节的程度、个体特征以及所在社区旅游发展程度对其族群认同的影响,以期深化族群认同研究和社区节庆研究。

一、文献回顾

1. 族群认同以及测量

族群认同概念来自3个相关的理论。Erikson(1968)的自我认同理论和Marcia(1980)的认同发展理论指出,个体通过批判和承认的过程可以构造出一个特定的认同。批判意味着个体对“有意义选择”的探索过程,承认则指个体对“个体自身”的探究(Cervone,1998)。Tajfel(1981)的社会认同理论指出,社会成员的认同指个体在所属社会组织(或群体)中自我形象的部分。从社会学角度看,族群认同包括两部分:关于社会群体成员的个体认识和个体与所属群体的价值、情感联系(Pegg & Plybon,2005;Worrell,Conyers & Mpofu,et al.,2006)。

为区分和比较不同人口的族群认同,Phinney(1992)首次开发了可用于各民族和种族的多族群认同测量量表。总体看,MEIM有3个版本被广泛地运用于族群认同研究中(见表1):Phinney(1992)的原始版(14项指标),Roberts、Phinney和Masse等(1999)的修订版(12项指标),Phinney和Ong(2007)的修订版(6项指标)。MEIM最早被用于青少年研究领域,但在成年人研究中也表现出良好的心理测量特性(Pegg & Plybon,2005;Feitosa,Lacerenza & Joseph,et al.,2017)。Roberts、Phinney和Masse等(1999)修订后的MEIM作为在不同环境下评估族群认同的有效方式而被广泛运用(Yoon,2011;Burrow-Sanchez,2014;Sarno & Mohr,2016)。MEIM的指标结构维度也有3种类型:单一结构、双因子结构和三因子结构(见表2)。虽有研究表明,在不同背景中运用MEIM可以产生更多的族群认同维度以准确评估族群认同的认知、情感和行为(Lee & Yoo,2004;Gaines,Bunce & Robertson,et al.,2010),但更多学者认为MEIM是由族群认同承诺和族群认同探索构成的稳定的双因子结构(Lee & Yoo,2004;Kazarian & Boyadjian,2008;Gaines,Bunce & Robertson,et al.,2010;Blozis & Villarreal,2014;Feitosa,Lacerenza & Joseph,et al.,2017)。其中,族群认同承诺指“成员意识和对群体的态度”(Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.,1999),族群认同探索指“寻求与族群相关的信息和经历”(Phinney & Ong,2007)。

表1   MEIM的指标和因子结构

Tab. 1  Factor dimensions and items about MEIM

指标量表版本及其因子结构
Phinney(1992) Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.(1999)Phinney &Ong(2007)
1.我花了很多时间去了解我的族群,如历史、传统和风俗。族群认同成就探索探索
2.我活跃在组织或社会团体中,这些组织或社会团体主要包括我自己族群的成员。族群行为探索探索*
3.我很清楚自己的族群背景以及这对我意味着什么。族群认同成就确认/属性承诺
4.我可以想到族群对我生活的很多影响。族群认同成就探索
5.我很高兴我是我族群中的一员。确认与归属确认/属性
6.我不太清楚我的族群在我生活中的作用(反向)。族群认同成就
7.我真的没有花太多时间去了解我这个族群的文化和历史(反向)。族群认同成就
8.我有强烈的族群归属感。确认与归属确认/属性承诺
9.我很清楚我的族群成员对我意味着什么。族群认同成就确认/属性承诺
10.为进一步了解我的族群背景,我经常和其他人谈论我的族群。族群认同成就探索探索
11.我为我的族群和他们的成就感到骄傲。确认与归属确认/属性
12.我参与一些我们自己族群的文化实践活动,比如特色饮食、民族音乐或习俗等。族群行为探索探索*
13.我对自己的族群有着强烈的依恋。确认与归属确认/属性
14.我对自己的文化或族群背景很满意。确认与归属确认/属性

注:(1)表格由作者根据文献(Phinney,1992;Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.,1999;Phinney & Ong,2007)整理得到;(2)表中因子结构名称的中英文对应包括族群认同成就(ethnic identity achievement)、族群行为(ethnic behaviors)、确认与归属(affirmation and belonging)、探索(exploration)、确认(affirmation)/属性(belonging)、承诺(commitment);(3)“*”表示笔者的理解,Phinney和Ong(2007)提出的修订版MEIM-R只有6项指标(3项探索、3项承诺),第3项“探索”指标原文为“我经常做一些事情来帮助我更好地了解我的族群背景”(I have often done things that will help me understand my ethnic background better),根据意思接近原则,将其分别对应Phinney(1992) , Roberts、Phinney和Masse等(1999)的第2项和第12项指标

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


表2   MEIM的3类结构维度

Tab. 2  Three types of structural dimensions about MEIM

模型结构代表论文维度名称含义
单结构Phinney,1992;Worrell,Conyers & Mpofu,et al.,2006族群认同“族群认同是个体自我概念的一部分,它来源于对社会群体(或群体)成员的认识,以及个体作为成员的价值和情感意义”(Tajfel,1981,引自Phinney,1992:156)
双因子结构Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.,1999;Pegg & Plybon,2005;Phinney & Ong,2007;Kazarian & Boyadjian,2008;Feitosa,Lacerenza & Joseph,et al.,2017(1)确认/
承诺
(2)探索
(1)“群体成员的意识和群体对个体的态度”(Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.,1999:302)
(2)“寻求与族群相关的信息和经历”(Phinney & Ong,2007:272)
三因子结构Gaines,Bunce & Robertson,et al.,2010(1)行为
(2)认知
(3)情感
(1)行为/探索
(2)搜索/解决族群问题
(3)确认(Gaines,Bunce & Robertson,et al.,2010
Lee & Yoo,2004(1)认知识别
(2)情感自豪

(3)行为参与
(1)“清晰的自我理解意识和归属感”(Lee & Yoo,2004:266)
(2)“对某一族群成员的积极影响”(Lee & Yoo,2004:266)
(3)“对族群活动参与的积极性”(Lee & Yoo,2004:267)

注:表格由笔者根据文献(Feitosa,Lacerenza & Joseph,et al., 2017)整理得到

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2. 节庆与族群认同

节庆有助于保留、传承和再现社区的宗教、地方传统和文化认同(Vahed,2002;Elias-Varotsis,2006),帮助社区成员保持积极的自我认同(De Bres & Davis,2001),重建地方认同和重构象征认同(Jeong & Santos,2004)。节庆也可以为参与者、利益相关者甚至社区带来有意义的社会成果,如强化成员关系、增加社会资本(Stadler,2013;Bagiran & Kurgun,2016)等。节庆还能够提高社区凝聚力和社区能力(Edwards,2012),增加社区福祉(Yolal,Gursoy & Uysal,et al.,2016)。当成员们参与节庆时,会创造社区意识(Irimoto,2004),节庆参与可以提高个体的社区自豪感、认同感和归属感(Kaplan,Higdon & Crago,et al.,2004;Yürük,Akyol & Şimşek,2017),促进形成社区成员间新的社交关系,增强社会凝聚力以创造社会资本(Arcodia & Whitford,2006)。

族群认同是个体自我概念的重要部分(Phinney,1992)。Ong、Fuller-Rowell和Phinney(2010)指出少数民族族群认同的发展过程经历了自我探索、改变和巩固的阶段。族群认同可以通过族群的价值符号得以发展,如民族节庆中的装束、音乐、语言和仪式。民族节庆也可以对社区成员族群认同的发展有积极影响:一方面,民族节庆的仪式性活动可以创造参与者的团结意识(Irimoto,2004),如舞蹈表演可以反映一个民族的社会文化政治冲突和转变,在形成成员族群认同方面至关重要(Deagon,2008),音乐表演作为一种建构地方的社会实践(魏琳琳,2020)和节庆仪式(唐雪琼、钱俊希、杨茜好,2017;魏琳琳,2020)可以强化少数民族的身份和族群认同;另一方面,节庆作为一个关键的对话工具,成员可以借此进行交流(Kaplan,Higdon & Crago,et al.,2004),还为参与者提供了一个理解不同群体间差异性和共同性的良好机会,并由此培育参与者对文化多样性的尊重和欣赏(Linden,1997)。已有研究证明在移民社区的族群中,节庆在明确族群边界、创造族群意识、构造族群成员间集体认同感方面起着至关重要的作用(Wang,2003;Kaplan,Higdon & Crago,et al.,2004;Yoon,2011);节日活动有助于增强移民群体的族群标记和对本族群的归属感(Chacko,2013),增进和维持族群认同(Davis,Jackson & Jackson,2009;Jackson,2020)。

综上,族群认同是自我认同和社会认同理论中的重要概念,MEIM是用来测量不同人群族群认同的常用工具,但未见MEIM被用于节庆研究。诸多研究证实了节庆对社区成员和社区均有积极的社会影响,但鲜有研究关注社区成员的个体特征以及成员在节庆中的不同参与方式会对其自身的族群认同产生怎样的影响。基于此,笔者展开了相关研究。

二、研究方法

1. 研究背景

火把节是彝族年节文化的重要组成部分,堪称彝族文化的一个标志性符号(李祥林,2016),是彝族最著名的文化庆典之一。火把节来源于几千年前彝族古老的太阳历法,举办时间为每年的农历六月二十四日。本质上,火把节是彝族人民利用对火的崇拜来进行祭岁和祈年等一系列活动的节日(陈海,2015),体现了农耕文明时代祭火的古代传统。

四川凉山彝族自治州有超过240万的彝族同胞,约占全国彝族总人口的1/3,是全国最大的彝族聚居区(温春来,2007)。在四川凉山彝族自治州,有两种类型的火把节:一类是由州政府组织、各县参与的五年一次的“中国•凉山彝族国际火把节”(简称“国际火把节”)和一年一次的“中国•西昌凉山彝族火把节”(简称“凉山火把节”);另一类是由县政府号召、各乡镇组织并参加的一年一度的凉山彝族火把节(简称“民间火把节”)。不同于国际火把节和凉山火把节,由于民间火把节举办地交通不便捷、接待设施不健全,观众中虽有少量外来旅游者(以摄影爱好者居多),但多数仍以社区居民为主。民间火把节是彝族人民火把文化庆祝的一种原始形式,通过一系列仪式、表演和竞赛活动,展现彝族人民的宗教观、价值观和世界观。当地社区居民在民间火把节中可以参加各式活动,如男子可以参加斗牛、斗羊、赛马、摔跤、爬杆等竞赛活动和选美;女子可以表演阿都高腔、朵乐荷(一种民族文化舞蹈形式)和选美;老年人可以展示传统仪式、演示民族习俗;孩子们可以在夜晚尽情玩火把。所有人不分民族、年龄、性别和身份,都可以参加火把节狂欢:夜幕下,大家围绕火把尽情跳达体舞。

彝族火把节于2006年被列入第一批国家级非物质文化遗产名录,四川凉山彝族自治州也因火把节而发展成为一个备受游客欢迎的旅游目的地。2016年,彝族火把节共吸引游客326.39万人次。鉴于本研究关注社区节庆举办对成员族群认同的影响,故选择2016年普格县和布拖县举办的民间火把节为研究数据收集点。

2. 研究工具

本研究采用问卷调查法收集数据。问卷包括了三部分内容:第一部分调查社区成员参加火把节的具体状况和具体活动;第二部分采用Roberts、Phinney和Masse等(1999)修订的包括12项指标的MEIM量表,量表采用李克特5级尺度(1~5表示从完全不同意到完全同意)测量火把节参与者对这些族群认同指标的反应;第三部分调查被访者所属社区、性别、年龄、受教育程度等个人信息。

3. 数据收集

课题组于2016年7月在彝族民间火把节举办期间分两阶段进行实地调研。第一个阶段是布拖县民间火把节举办期即7月21日至24日;第二个阶段为普格县民间火把节举办期即7月26日至29日。调研人员由6名来自布拖县和普格县的彝族大学生组成(3名是笔者的学生,另外3名是学生的亲戚或朋友)。在正式调研前,笔者向调研人员就问卷调查技巧、研究目的以及MEIM量表各指标进行了培训和详细阐释。被访者均为彝族人,且部分人员未上过学只会彝语,为保证调研信息的准确性,调研人员在火把节现场只用彝语对被访者提问,并记录答案,最终收集到490份有效问卷(263份来自布拖县,227份来自普格县)。被访者以男性为主,多数为18~44岁的中青年,接近1/4的被访者未上过学,超过一半的被访者表示曾参加过火把节的具体活动(见表3)。

表3   被访者个人特征

Tab. 3  Respondent characteristics

个人特征具体选项人数百分比(%)
性别女性16233.1
男性32866.9
年龄18~24岁17134.9
25~34岁13427.3
35~44岁10120.6
45~64岁6914.1
≥65岁153.1
受教育程度未上学11423.3
小学13126.7
初中9218.8
高中6212.7
大专或大学9118.4
参加火把节的活动
类型
运动项目(斗牛、斗羊、赛马、摔跤)595.8
歌舞(阿都高腔、朵乐荷)222.2
选美111.1
火把游山13012.7
火把狂欢(达体舞)29929.4
只是观看48447.6
其他(如在火把节现场销售小食品)121.2

注:题项“参加火把节的活动类型”是多项选择题,数据经过了多重响应分析,故总数量为1 017

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


4. 数据分析

本研究首先运用数据统计分析软件SPSS 17.0检验数据信度、效度,并作探索性因子分析确定MEIM的因子结构,再运用结构方程模型软件AMOS 24.0作验证性因子分析检测数据与测量模型的整体拟合度,最后用SPSS 17.0中多元方差分析比较社区节庆旅游发展程度、社区成员的个体特征和节庆中参与积极性及强度对族群认同影响的差异。

三、分析与结果

1. 探索性因子分析

(1)数据的信效度检验。SPSS 17.0分析计算结果显示,量表总Alpha系数α=0.703>0.7,表明量表内部一致性良好,即效度较好;再经KMO样本测度和Bartlett球形度检验,结果显示KMO=0.858>0.8,显著性水平p=0.000<0.0001,说明各变量存在一定相关关系,问卷数据适合进行因子分析。

(2)探索性因子分析。运用具有Kaiser标准化的正交旋转法,采取主成分分析法,从12项指标中提取出两个特征值大于1的公因子,其累计方差解释贡献率为56.972%,能够较好地解释12项测量指标(见表4)。

表4   探索性因子分析

Tab. 4  Results of exploratory factor analysis (n = 490)

因子和指标探索性因子分析
方差解释百分比特征值因子载荷量
F1:EIC(α=0.859)35.4404.253
3.我很清楚自己的彝族背景以及这对我意味着什么。0.666
5.我很高兴我是彝族的一员。0.750
6.对彝族有很强烈的归属感。0.713
7.我很清楚我的彝族同胞对我意味着什么(deleted)。0.261
9.我为我们彝族和彝族的成就感到骄傲。0.676
11.我对自己彝族有着强烈的依恋。0.613
12.我对自己的文化或彝族背景很满意。0.693
F2:EIE(α=0.691)21.5322.384
1.我花了很多时间去了解彝族,如历史、传统和风俗。0.591
2.我活跃在组织或社会团体中,这些组织或社会团体主要包括彝族成员。0.757
4.我可以想到族群对我生活的很多影响。0.525
8.为进一步了解我的彝族背景,我经常和其他人谈论我们彝族。0.680
10.我参与一些我们彝族的文化实践活动,比如特色饮食、民族音乐或习俗等。0.776

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


(3)对因子进行命名。通过方差最大化正交旋转法,旋转在3次迭代后收敛,得到旋转成分矩阵。经因子分析后保留了11项指标,这11个因子的载荷量为0.525~0.776,指标7“我很清楚我的彝族同胞对我意味着什么”因指标载荷量较低而被去掉。克隆巴赫系数两个维度的值为0.691和0.859,表明了测量的内在一致性。参考以往学者(Tajfel,1981;Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.,1999;Phinney & Ong,2007;Burrow-Sanchez,2014)运用MEIM量表进行研究的命名方式,将两个主成分分别命名为族群认同探索(Ethnic Identity Exploration,简称EIE,包括5项指标)和族群认同承诺(Ethnic Identity Commitment,简称EIC,包括6项指标)。EIC反映了个体在族群态度方面的表现,而EIE用于衡量个体在族群行动方面的表现。

2. 验证性因子分析

运用AMOS 24.0对样本数据的2个潜变量、12个观测变量作验证性因子分析(见表5)。删除1项因子载荷小于0.6的观测变量“我很清楚我的彝族同胞对我意味着什么”,数据与测量模型的整体拟合度良好,拟合指数chi-square=87.232,df=32,chi-square/df=2.726,GFI=0.936,p=0.000,AGFI=0.902,CFI=0.912,TLI=0.907,RMEEA=0.078,均达到理想值;所有显变量与潜变量之间的测量路径均在99%的置信区间内(双尾)显著。根据Bagozzi (1981)的观点,标准化因子负荷量Std. >0.7为理想值,大于0.6为可接受值;SMC是FL的平方,SMC>0.5为理想值,大于0.36为可接受值;组成信度CR>0.8为理想值,大于0.7为可接受值;收敛效度AVE>0.5为理想值,大于0.36为可接受值。样本因子的标准化载荷均大于0.6,收敛效度AVE均大于理想值0.5,SMC大部分为理想值,EIC1、EIC5和EIE1的SMC值也在可接受范围。这表明潜变量具有良好的内部一致性和收敛效度,各潜变量很好地聚合于相应显变量,量表的观察变量能较好地被结构变量所解释。最后,两个潜变量间的皮尔森相关值为0.531,小于0.71,表明两个潜变量之间有显著区分,潜变量的大部分信息只能被自身的观测变量解释,与另一潜变量的观测变量相关性极低(MacKenzie,Podsakoff & Podsakoff,2011)。

表5   观测变量基本统计量与验证性因子分析结果

Tab. 5  Items with descriptive statistics and results of CFA

观测变量均值
(标准差)
标准化
因子载荷
解释
能力
组成
信度
收敛
效度
EIC0.525
EIC1我很清楚自己的彝族背景以及这对我意味着什么。4.78(0.570)0.660***0.4360.869
EIC2我很高兴我是彝族的一员。4.76(0.579)0.773***0.598
EIC3对彝族有很强烈的归属感。4.67(0.667)0.725***0.526
EIC4我为我们彝族和彝族的成就感到骄傲。4.75(0.589)0.729***0.531
EIC5我对自己彝族有着强烈的依恋。4.66(0.737)0.691***0.477
EIC6我对自己的文化或彝族背景很满意。4.80(0.485)0.765***0.585
EIE0.551
EIE1我花了很多时间去了解彝族,如历史、传统和风俗。4.35(0.941)0.690***0.4760.860
EIE2我活跃在组织或社会团体中,这些组织或社会团体主要包括彝族成员。4.17(0.974)0.744***0.554
EIE3我可以想到族群对我生活的很多影响。4.50(0.735)0.784***0.615
EIE4为进一步了解我的彝族背景,我经常和其他人谈论我们彝族。4.53(0.814)0.729***0.531
EIE5我参与一些彝族的文化实践活动,比如特色饮食、民族音乐或习俗等。4.38(0.957)0.762***0.581

注:***表示参数估计在99.9%的置信水平下显著,即p<0.01

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


3. 多元方差分析

单因素多元方差分析被用来检测族群成员所在社区特征(旅游发展程度)、个人特征(年龄、性别、受教育程度)和参与节庆活动差异(当年是否参加/观看火把节、近5年是否参加/观看火把节、参与火把节的具体活动类型)对族群认同的影响,数据分析结果见表6表7

表6   多元显著效应(p<0.05)

Tab. 6  Significant multivariate effects(p<0.05)

变量Pillai跟踪检验F值自由度显著性
个人状况社区来源0.0749.40620.000
性别0.0205.04710.007
受教育程度0.0452.20850.016
参与活动近5年均参加火把节0.05012.82210.000
情况参与活动类型0.1134.80460.000

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


(1)社区旅游发展程度显著影响社区成员族群认同。数据分析表明,布拖县、金阳县、昭觉县等的彝族民众的族群认同承诺强于普格县。布拖县和普格县均是民间火把节举办地,但两县民众却有不同的族群认同承诺,可能原因是普格县因旅游业快速发展,减弱了社区族群的族群认同承诺。布拖县号称火把节之乡,普格县称自己为火把节发源地,两县均希望通过火把节发展旅游业,但普格县因区位优势(更靠近西昌市,交通便利)和政策优势(县政府更重视火把节,积极采取营销策略),依托火把节的旅游业发展速度和规模明显强于布拖县。

表 7   单变量显著效应(p<0.05)

Tab. 7  Significant univariate effects(p<0.05)

因变量自由度F值自变量均值95%置信区间
下限上限
社区来源
Ι219.330布拖县(N=324)0.1790.0740.284
普格县(N=155)—0.397—0.549—0.245
其他县(如昭觉、金阳) (N=11)0.324—0.2480.895
性别
Ι14.647男性(N=328)0.068—0.0400.176
女性(N=162)—0.138—0.2920.016
15.417男性(N=328)0.074—0.0340.182
女性(N=162)—0.149—0.3030.005
受教育程度
Ι53.309未上过学(N=114)0.1930.0110.374
小学(N=131)0.145—0.0240.315
初中(N=92)—0.279—0.482—0.077
高中(N=62)—0.161—0.4080.085
大专(N=37)—0.093—0.4120.227
大学和研究生(N=54)—0.035—0.2990.230
近5年参加火把节
Ι14.299是(N=334)0.064—0.0430.171
否(N=156)—0.137—0.2930.020
121.016是(N=334)0.1390.0330.244
否(N=156)—0.297—0.451—0.143
参与活动类型
68.849运动类(N=61)0.158—0.0830.398
唱歌跳舞(N=20)0.032—0.3870.452
选美比赛(N=3)0.719—0.2191.658
火把游山(N=116)0.2440.0700.418
火把狂欢(N=174)0.120—0.0230.262
火把节现场售卖食品(N=8)—0.987—1.650—0.323
只是观看(N=107)—0.508—0.690—0.327

注:Ι表示“族群认同承诺”,Ⅱ表示“族群认同探索”

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


(2)族群成员参加火把节的强度和参与程度显著影响族群认同。数据分析表明,“一年是否参加/观看火把节”并不会对族群认同产生显著影响(Sig.>0.05),而“近5年是否参加/观看火把节”会对族群认同承诺和探索均产生显著影响。这表明,经常参加火把节(无论参加具体项目或只是观看),会强化彝族成员的族群认同。此外,参与火把节具体活动项目者的族群认同探索明显高于未参与任何活动者,具体表现为参加选美比赛、火把游山、运动项目(斗牛、斗羊、赛马、摔跤、爬杆等)、火把狂欢和歌舞项目(阿都高腔、朵乐荷等)者,依次强于观众和现场食品兜售者。

(3)族群成员的性别、受教育程度显著影响族群认同。一方面,男性彝族成员在族群认同承诺和探索方面均高于女性。这可能跟彝族的传统家庭文化有关,男性在家庭中处于主导地位,女性处于从属地位,男性在社会活动中表现得更为自信和积极。另一方面,受教育程度对族群认同探索无显著影响,但对族群认同承诺的影响呈“U”形,即未上过学和仅上过小学的群体族群认知程度最高,上过初中和高中的群体族群认知程度最低,而上过大专、大学和研究生的群体族群认知程度又有一定程度上升。可能原因是彝族孩子多在西昌市接受初中和高中教育,而西昌市更多受多民族文化影响,导致族群认知程度降低;未上学和仅上过小学的群体多在当地,长期接受本族群文化的影响,会强化他们的族群认同;到外地甚至外省上大学的彝族群体,在与其他族群接触的过程中,会唤起族群意识,明确族群边界,进而增强族群认同承诺,原因类似于以往移民社区成员族群认同得以增强的研究(Kaplan,Higdon & Crago,et al.,2004;Chacko,2013)。数据分析还表明,年龄对族群认同并不会产生显著影响。

四、结论及讨论

1. 研究结论

(1)MEIM量表在民族节庆研究领域存在族群认同承诺和族群认同探索两个维度,且具有测量稳定性。研究表明Roberts、Phinney和Masse等(1999)修订的MEIM量表的12项指标具有很强的内在一致性,并表现出与已有研究(Tajfel,1981;Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.,1999;Burrow-Sanchez,2014;Feitosa,Lacerenza & Joseph,et al.,2017)相一致的双因素结构。然而,本研究中两个维度的某些部分与以往研究存在些许差异:EFA和CFA分析均表明题项7(我很清楚我的彝族同胞对我意味着什么)的因子载荷量很低,这说明在新环境下,题项7能否作为一个可靠指标尚待进一步研究,正如Yap、Donnellan和Schwartz等(2014)所提出的,MEIM在不同的族群研究中是否具有等价性存在争议。出现研究结论差异可能是由于文化多样性(Mastrotheodoros,Dimitrova & Motti-Stefanidi,2012)和本研究被访者对测量项目理解存在偏差导致的。本研究首次将MEIM的运用从人类学、社会学领域扩展到节庆研究,证实了MEIM在民族节庆研究中具有一定的适用性。

(2)社区节庆旅游发展程度负向影响成员族群认同承诺。火把节作为民族节庆,可理解为以人文景观为核心吸引游客前往,该结论回应了孙九霞(2010)提出的“在不同环境下、不同旅游开发强度的目的地社区,旅游对当地的族群认同具有不同程度影响”的研究结论,但不同于她得出“在高强度、浅接触的旅游作用下,人文景观社区的族群认同得到强化”的研究结论。普格县民间火把节吸引了大量游客前往,且节庆活动持续举办3天(可理解为“高强度”),节庆活动传统性决定游客只能作为看台观众(可理解为“浅接触”),但研究表明普格县社区居民的族群认同不是被强化而是被分化(具体表现在族群承诺方面)。具体原因到底是外来游客本身携带的文化分化了社区成员的族群认同,还是普格县为迎合游客需求改变了节庆主办形式和内容(如邀请政府领导出席、组织歌星演唱会、现场优先普通话主持),尚待进一步研究。

(3)社区成员参与民族节庆的程度和强度正向影响成员族群认同。参与民间火把节具体活动项目的族群成员在族群认同探索上显著高于观看者;经常参与火把节的族群成员在族群认同(承诺和探索)方面高于偶然参与者。以往研究表明民族节庆的舞蹈(Deagon,2008)、音乐(魏琳琳,2020)和节庆仪式(唐雪琼、钱俊希、杨茜好,2017;魏琳琳,2020)会强化少数民族群体的族群认同,但这些研究均采用归纳与演绎的定性分析方法;同时,以往研究只是笼统表明节庆活动对少数民族成员族群认同有强化作用,并不清楚族群成员对这些民族节庆活动的参与程度、强度与他们族群认同之间的关系。本研究结论深化了节庆研究和族群认同研究,率先为族群成员参与民族节庆对族群认同的影响提供了实证依据,并表明在民族节庆中将族群认同探索因素和族群认同承诺因素共同考虑时,族群认同的框架和功能会在许多方面受到改变。基于MEIM(Roberts,Phinney & Masse,et al.,1999)两个维度的分析,本研究表明族群成员参与民族节庆会改变个人的族群认同,积极参与节庆的各项活动会促进其发展族群认同探索,经常参加节庆会强化其族群认同承诺和族群认同探索,本研究为未来更多有关节庆对族群认同的影响研究奠定了基础。

(4)族群成员的个人特征影响族群认同。族群认同与族群成员的性别、受教育程度显著相关,在本研究中,表现为彝族男性的族群认同(承诺和探索)高于女性;受教育程度对族群认同(承诺)的影响呈“U”形,即低和高受教育程度的彝族成员族群认同承诺高于中等受教育程度群体。这是族群成员族群认同研究的新发现。本研究结论基于凉山彝族族群文化的特殊性和彝族孩子上学地点的实际差异,在其他族群中是否有类似结论,尚待发现。

2. 管理建议

(1)本研究加深了对民族节庆潜在社会影响的了解,为民族节庆活动的组织举办提供了管理建议。对当地社区而言,节庆组织者积极参与节庆组织非常重要(Van Winkle,Woosnam & Mohammed,2013)。为获得社会效益,当地人也应在发展和传承节庆中扮演积极角色(Clarke & Jepson,2011)。在我国,各级政府越来越多地参与主办地方节庆,尤其是在欠发达的少数民族地区,为通过节庆旅游来促进地方经济发展,政府往往是唯一的节庆组织者。旅游是一种文化探索的方式(Greenwood,1989),基于地方文化保护和旅游可持续发展,应确保少数民族在组织节庆方面得到应有的尊重和自由。本研究表明在民族节庆中当地人民的族群认同不容忽视,当地政府应鼓励民众通过节庆来保护文化,采取有效方式激励当地民众参与节庆。民族节庆不仅有利于当地经济发展,也是一个有效的保护民族传统、增强族群认同的平台。

(2)鼓励社区成员参加民族节庆可以有效培育参与者的族群认同。我国是多民族国家,在乡村振兴战略倡导下,各民族地区普遍希望通过举办特色节庆活动以振兴当地经济、保护民族文化,节庆组织者应通过民族音乐、舞蹈、食物等形式来尽可能多地吸引参与者。社会成员积极参与节庆可有效保持和增强他们的族群认同感,从而促进社会团结和维持文化多样性(Lee & Huang,2015)。

五、研究不足与未来展望

首先,本研究应用MEIM量表以验证民族节庆对社区成员族群认同的影响,属探索性研究,研究中并未改动MEIM量表,未来研究可依据族群参与民族节庆的特点,通过深入访谈获取信息,对原有量表作优化调整。其次,本研究仅关注一个民族节庆,研究结果是否适用于其他民族节庆还需进一步验证。再次,问卷调查中有超过1/4的被访者未上过学,问卷过程完全是由彝族大学生用彝语一问一答完成,调研过程可能存在调查人员解释不够准确、被访者理解存在偏差的问题,未来可开展更多的实证研究以验证现有结论。最后,本研究只关注社区主导的民间火把节,并未与完全由政府主导的国际火把节和凉山火把节作对比研究,未来研究可比较不同主办方主导的节庆对社区成员族群认同的影响差异。

参考文献

Amini A, Safian M J .

Play and festival: The role of participation in the experience of art

[J]. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2013,4(3):769~ 776.

[本文引用: 1]

Andersson T D, Armbrecht J, Lundberg E .

Estimating use and non-use values of a music festival

[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 2012,12(3):215~ 231.

[本文引用: 1]

Arcodia C, Whitford M .

Festival attendance and the development of social capital

[J]. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 2006,8(2):1~ 18.

[本文引用: 1]

Bagiran D, Kurgun H .

A research on social impacts of the Foça Rock Festival: The validity of the Festival Social Impact Attitude Scale

[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2016,19(9):930~ 948.

[本文引用: 1]

Bagozzi R P .

Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: A comment

[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981,18(3):375~ 381.

[本文引用: 1]

Blozis S A, Villarreal R .

Analytic approaches to the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM)

[J]. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2014,38(7):577~ 580.

[本文引用: 1]

This brief research report shows how different applications of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) can have implications for the interpretation of the role of ethnic identity in research. Throughout the MEIM's widespread use, notable inconsistencies lie in how the measure has been applied. This report uses empirical data to demonstrate differences in statistical inference due to these differences in usage.

Burrow-Sanchez J J .

Measuring Ethnic Identity in Latino Adolescents with Substance Use Disorders

[J]. Substance Use & Misuse, 2014,49(8):982~ 986.

[本文引用: 4]

The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) is a frequently used instrument to assess the level of ethnic identity in adolescents. The factor structure of the MEIM has extensively been studied in diverse nonclinical samples, while research with clinical samples of adolescents is lacking. The purpose of the current study is to identify the factor structure of the MEIM in a clinical sample of Latino adolescents (N = 106) with substance use disorders. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to test three competing factor structure models of the MEIM. Results indicated that a six-item two-factor model best fit the data for Latino adolescents in this study. Implications of these results and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Cervone E .

Festival time, long live the festival: Ethnic conflict and ritual in the Andes

[J]. Anthropos, 1998,93(1—3):101~ 113.

[本文引用: 2]

Chacko E .

La Fiesta DC: The ethnic festival as an act of belonging in the city

[J]. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 2013,34(4):443~ 453.

[本文引用: 2]

Clarke A, Jepson A .

Power and hegemony within a community festival

[J]. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 2011,2(1):7~ 19.

[本文引用: 1]

Crompton J L .

Economic impact studies: Instruments for political shenanigans?

[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2006,45(1):67~ 82.

[本文引用: 1]

Davis J, Jackson M, Jackson R .

Heritage tourism and group identity: Polynesians in the American West

[J]. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2009,4(1):3~ 17.

[本文引用: 1]

De Bres K, Davis J .

Celebrating group and place identity: A case study of a new regional festival

[J]. Tourism Geographies, 2001,3(3):326~ 337.

[本文引用: 1]

Deagon A .

Folk dance and ethnic identity

[J]. Dance Chronicle, 2008,31(2):275~ 278.

[本文引用: 3]

Diedering M, Kwiatkowski G .

Economic impact of events and festivals on host regions:Methods in practice & potential sources of bias

[J]. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 2015(22):247~ 252.

[本文引用: 1]

Edwards R .

Gympie’s country music Muster: Creating a cultural economy from a local tradition

[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012,28(4):517~ 527.

[本文引用: 1]

This paper provides an historical analysis of the National Country Music Muster, a country music festival held in a forest outside of Gympie, a town in rural southeast Queensland, Australia, between the period 1982 and 2006 (the first twenty-five years of the event). This article analyses the origins of the Muster, demonstrating how local events are often developed as a result of regional traditions and assets, or 'countryside capital' (Garrod et al., 2006). While this countryside capital was used to develop the Muster, this paper will demonstrate the event created its own capital, which the Gympie community has then utilised. The Muster has enabled the development of community capacity in three key ways: community not-for-profit groups have received increased income through participation as volunteers at the Muster; collaborative efforts between groups have developed senses of community on site; and the Muster has fostered social capital development by encouraging volunteer groups to work on site, all of which, of course, ensures the Muster continues to operate. Additionally, the Muster has provided the impetus for the creation of two country music focused cultural institutions in Gympie, as well as several spin-off events, which seek to capitalise on the increased traffic through town during the Muster period. Each of these institutions and spin off events has helped embed country music within Gympie's cultural economy. Further, they provide a clear demonstration of a rural community actively and creatively deploying its cultural capital in order both to buttress itself against fluctuations in the town's fortunes and to assert a locally relevant country identity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

Elias-Varotsis S .

Festivals and events——(Re)interpreting cultural identity

[J]. Tourism Review, 2006,61(2):24~ 29.

[本文引用: 1]

Erikson E .

Identity:Youth and crisis

[M]. New York:Norton, 1968.

[本文引用: 1]

Falassi A. Time Out of Time: Essays on the Festival[M]. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1987.

[本文引用: 1]

Feitosa J, Lacerenza C N, Joseph D L , et al.

Ethnic identity: Factor structure and measurement invariance across ethnic groups

[J]. Psychological Assessment, 2017,29(9):1129~ 1141.

[本文引用: 4]

Considering a historically diversified (and growing) population in the United States, one's ethnic identification is often an important psychological-as well as social and political-construct because it can serve as a hindrance to interpersonal interaction. Despite the importance of ethnic identity in psychological research, the most widely developed ethnic identity measurement tool, the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM; Phinney, 1992), lacks consensus regarding its psychometric properties. The purpose of this article is to identify the factor structure of this measure and identify whether it exhibits measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) across ethnicities. The current findings offer several contributions to the state of the literature. First, our data suggests a two-factor model, including affirmation/commitment and exploration factors, is the most appropriate structure when considering fit and parsimony indices via confirmatory factor analysis. Second, configural and metric measurement equivalence was found across Caucasian and non-Caucasian participants. Interestingly, partial scalar invariance was established when comparing Caucasians with the minority groups with the exception of the Hispanic subgroup, which exhibited no scalar invariance. Third, differences in ethnic identity factor means were found, especially across Caucasians and African Americans. In conclusion, the use of the two-factor model of the MEIM is recommended, and results suggest that the MEIM is an appropriate measure of ethnic identity in most ethnic groups. Limitations and future research are also discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Gaines Jr S O, Bunce D, Robertson T , et al.

Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) within the United Kingdom

[J]. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2010,10(1):1~ 19.

[本文引用: 3]

Getz D .

The nature and scope of festival studies

[J]. International Journal of Event Management Research, 2010,5(1):1~ 47.

[本文引用: 3]

Greenwood D J. Culture by the pound: An anthropological perspective on tourism as cultural commoditization[M] //Smith V L. Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989: 171~ 185.

[本文引用: 1]

Hede A M .

Managing special events in the new era of the triple bottom line

[J]. Event Management, 2007,11(1—2):13~ 22.

[本文引用: 1]

Irimoto T .

Creation of the Marimo festival: Ainu identity and ethnic symbiosis

[J]. Senri Ethnological Studies, 2004(66):11~ 38.

[本文引用: 2]

Jackson D J .

Polish American festivals and ethnic identity

[J]. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1743873X.2020.1740235.

[本文引用: 1]

Jeong S, Santos C A .

Cultural politics and contested place identity

[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2004,31(3):640~ 656.

[本文引用: 1]

Abstract

This paper considers festivals as place-contingent cultural politics and examines them as political instruments and promotional products at the same time. Conflicts between globalization, tradition, and place identity are discussed by examining the Kangnung Dano festival in Korea. Findings suggest that the contested meaning of place leads to the reconstruction of regional identities and the reframing of symbolic identities. Kangnung Dano is read as a “cultural framework” reflecting simplistic and dualistic classifications of festivals into sacred and secular, public and private, and social conflicts and cohesion through place identification. The paper proposes that regional identity has been dynamically constructed and is re-constructing due to contested meanings of place.

Résumé

Politique culturelle et identité de lieu contestée. Cet article considère d’abord les festivals comme des événements de la politique culturelle qui dépendent d’un lieu, et ensuite il les examine simultanément en tant qu’instruments politiques et produits promotionnels. On discute des conflits entre la mondialisation, la tradition et l’identité de lieu en examinant le festival de Kangnung Dano en Corée. Les résultats suggèrent que la signification contestée du lieu mène à la reconstruction des identités régionales et recadre des identités symboliques. Kangnung Dano se lit comme un « cadre culturel » qui reflète des classifications simplistes et dualistes des festivals entre sacré et profane, publique et privé et conflit ou cohésion sociaux selon l’identification de lieu. L’article soutient que l’identité régionale a été construite de façon dynamique et qu’elle est en train de se reconstruire grâce aux significations de lieu contestées. Mots-clés: politique culturelle, festivals, identité de lieu, mondialisation.

Kaplan M, Higdon F, Crago N , et al.

Futures festivals: An intergenerational strategy for promoting community participation

[J]. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2004,2(3—4):119~ 146.

[本文引用: 5]

Kazarian S S, Boyadjian M D .

Validation of the Multigroup ethnic identity measure among ethnic Armenian adolescents in Lebanon

[J]. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2008,8(4):335~ 347.

[本文引用: 1]

Lee I S, Huang S S .

Understanding motivations and benefits of attending a multicultural festival

[J]. Tourism Analysis, 2015,20(2):201~ 213.

[本文引用: 1]

Lee R M, Yoo H C .

Structure and measurement of ethnic identity for Asian American college students

[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2004,51(2):263~ 269.

[本文引用: 2]

Linden S .

A Festival of light: A high school healing arts event celebrating the ethnic diversity of the school community

[J]. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 1997,24(3):255~ 259.

[本文引用: 1]

MacKenzie S B, Podsakoff P M, Podsakoff N P .

Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques

[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2011,35(2):293~ 334.

[本文引用: 1]

Mair J, Whitford M .

An exploration of events research: Event topics, themes and emerging trends

[J]. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 2013,4(1):6~ 30.

[本文引用: 1]

Marcia J E .

Identity in adolescence

[M] //Adelson J. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1980: 159~ 187.

[本文引用: 1]

Mastrotheodoros S, Dimitrova R, Motti-Stefanidi F , et al.

Measurement invariance of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) across Bulgarian, Dutch and Greek samples

[J]. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2012,9(4):508~ 515.

[本文引用: 1]

The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM; Phinney, 1992) is a widely used instrument to quantify the way people think, feel, and behave regarding their ethnic origin. This instrument is commonly used to compare groups of people from different ethnic and/or cultural backgrounds. However, in order for these comparisons to be accurate, measurement invariance between groups needs to be tested and this is what has been done in the current study. First, confirmatory factor analyses were conducted separately for data sets with Bulgarian, Dutch, and Greek adolescents. Second, configural and scalar invariance were tested. Finally, comparisons between Bulgarian, Dutch, and Greek adolescents were made on their scores on MEIM.

Ong A D, Fuller-Rowell T E, Phinney J S.

Measurement of ethnic identity: Recurrent and emergent issues

[J]. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2010,10(1):39~ 49.

[本文引用: 1]

Pegg P O, Plybon L E .

Toward the theoretical measurement of ethnic identity

[J]. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 2005,25(2):250~ 264.

[本文引用: 2]

Phinney J S .

Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research

[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,108(3):499~ 514.

[本文引用: 1]

Ethnic identity is central to the psychological functioning of members of ethnic and racial minority groups, but research on the topic is fragmentary and inconclusive. This article is a review of 70 studies of ethnic identity published in refereed journals since 1972. The author discusses the ways in which ethnic identity has been defined and conceptualized, the components that have been measured, and empirical findings. The task of understanding ethnic identity is complicated because the uniqueness that distinguishes each group makes it difficult to draw general conclusions. A focus on the common elements that apply across groups could lead to a better understanding of ethnic identity.

Phinney J S .

The Multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups

[J]. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1992,7(2):156~ 176.

[本文引用: 8]

Phinney J S, Ong A D .

Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions

[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2007,54(3):271~ 281.

[本文引用: 6]

Rivera M A, Hara T, Kock G .

Economic impact of cultural events: The case of the Zora! Festival

[J]. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2008,3(2):121~ 137.

[本文引用: 1]

Roberts R E, Phinney J S, Masse L C , et al.

The Structure of ethnic identity of young adolescents from diverse ethnocultural groups

[J]. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 1999,19(3):301~ 322.

[本文引用: 11]

Saayman M, Rossouw R .

The significance of festivals to regional economies: Measuring the economic value of the Grahamstown National Arts Festival in South Africa

[J]. Tourism Economics, 2011,17(3):603~ 624.

[本文引用: 1]

This paper estimates the economic value of South Africa's longest running national arts festival, the Grahamstown National Arts Festival in the Eastern Cape Province. The Eastern Cape is a middle-income province (6.6% of national GDP), settles 9.6% of the South African population and has a high unemployment rate. A survey was conducted in July 2009, with 450 visitors completing a structured questionnaire at various sampling locations across the festival area. A social accounting matrix (SAM) for the province was used to estimate the economic value of the arts festival to the region's economy (adopting the classical SAMs multiplier approach) with visitor depending data. This research shows that the festival makes a significant contribution to revenue generation as well as to job creation, thereby confirming that investments made by government in arts and culture can address economic objectives.

Sarno E L, Mohr J J .

Adapting the Multigroup ethnic identity measure to assess LGB group identity

[J]. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2016,3(3):293~ 303.

[本文引用: 2]

Stadler R .

Power relations and the production of new knowledge within a Queensland Music Festival community cultural development project

[J]. Annals of Leisure Research, 2013,16(1):87~ 102.

[本文引用: 1]

Tajfel H. Human Groups and Social Categories[M]. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

[本文引用: 3]

Tohmo T .

Economic impacts of cultural events on local economies: An input-output analysis of the Kaustinen Folk Music Festival

[J]. Tourism Economics, 2005,11(3):431~ 451.

[本文引用: 1]

Vahed G .

Constructions of community and identity among Indians in colonial natal, 1860-1910: The role of the Muharram festival

[J]. The Journal of African History, 2002,43(1):77~ 93.

[本文引用: 1]

Van Winkle C M, Woosnam K M, Mohammed A M .

Sense of community and festival attendance

[J]. Event Management, 2013,17(2):155~ 163.

[本文引用: 2]

Wang W .

Revitalization of local community and ethnicity: Nagasaki’s lantern festival among the immigrant Chinese

[J]. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 2003,12(1):17~ 32.

[本文引用: 1]

Woosnam K M, Jiang J X, Van Winkle C M, et al.

Explaining festival impacts on a hosting community through motivations to attend

[J]. Event Management, 2016,20(1):11~ 25.

[本文引用: 1]

Worrell F C, Conyers L M, Mpofu E , et al.

Multigroup ethnic identity measure scores in a sample of adolescents from Zimbabwe

[J]. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2006,6(1):35~ 59.

[本文引用: 2]

Yap S C Y, Donnellan M B, Schwartz S J , et al.

Investigating the structure and measurement invariance of the Multigroup ethnic identity measure in a multiethnic sample of college students

[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2014,61(3):437~ 446.

[本文引用: 1]

In this article, we evaluate the factor structure of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM; Phinney, 1992) and test whether the MEIM exhibits measurement invariance across ethnic groups taken from a diverse sample of students from 30 different colleges and universities across the United States (N = 9,625). Initial analyses suggested that a bifactor model was an adequate representation of the structure of the MEIM. This model was then used in subsequent invariance tests. Results suggested that the MEIM displayed configural and metric invariance across 5 diverse ethnic groups (i.e., White, Black, Hispanic, East Asian, and South Asian). There were indications that the MEIM displayed a similar factor structure with roughly equivalent factor loadings across diverse ethnic groups. However, there was little evidence of scalar invariance across these groups, suggesting that mean-level comparisons of MEIM scores across ethnic groups should be interpreted with caution. The implications of these findings for the interpretation and use of this popular measure of ethnic identity are discussed.

Yolal M, Gursoy D, Uysal M , et al.

Impacts of festivals and events on residents’ well-being

[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2016(61):1~ 18.

[本文引用: 1]

Yoon E .

Measuring ethnic identity in the ethnic identity scale and the Multigroup ethnic identity measure-revised

[J]. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 2011,17(2):144~ 155.

[本文引用: 3]

This study examined the newly developed ethnic identity measures of the Ethnic Identity Scale (EIS) and the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure-Revised (MEIM-R) from psychometric and theoretical perspectives. Survey data from 289 counseling students in California were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analyses supported three correlated factors of the EIS (exploration, resolution, and affirmation) and two correlated factors of the MEIM-R (exploration, commitment) for both European American and minority students. Consistent with the theories of Erikson's and Marcia's identity development, the EIS and the MEIM-R nicely depicted (a) Marcia's 4 (2 x 2) identity statuses of diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium, and achievement and (b) the hierarchy of identity statuses in relation to subjective well-being as an indicator of adjustment, especially for minority students. Additionally, European American and minority students revealed differences as to the salience and importance of ethnic identity. Recommendations for using the EIS and the MEIM-R are provided.

Yürük P, Akyol A, Şimşek G G .

Analyzing the effects of social impacts of events on satisfaction and loyalty

[J]. Tourism Management, 2017(60):367~ 378.

[本文引用: 2]

Zeitler E .

Creating America’s ‘Czech Capital’: Ethnic identity and heritage tourism in Wilber, Nebraska

[J]. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2009,4(1):73~ 85.

[本文引用: 1]

陈海 .

彝族火把节的民俗意义及文化内涵

[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2015,36(10):100~ 103.

[本文引用: 1]

李祥林 .

“人本文化”的口头表述和行为实践——彝族火把节的文化人类学透视

[J]. 广西民族研究, 2016(3):79~ 85.

[本文引用: 1]

孙九霞 .

旅游对目的地社区族群认同的影响——基于不同旅游作用的案例分析

[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2010,50(1):170~ 177.

[本文引用: 2]

旅游对于族群文化和认同正在产生越来越重要的影响。基于对不同旅游社区的大量田野调查,作者发现在不同环境下、不同旅游开发强度的目的地社区,旅游对当地的族群认同具有不同程度的影响。基本可分为三种类型:一种如云南迪庆的雨崩村,在低强度、深接触的旅游作用下保持了自然景观社区的族群认同;第二种如西双版纳的傣族园,在高强度、浅接触的旅游作用下,人文景观社区的族群认同得到了强化;第三种以各类主题公园化的民俗村为典型,在该类型社区中,高强度、异接触的旅游作用分化了社区的族群认同。

唐雪琼, 钱俊希, 杨茜好 .

跨境流动视阈下的节庆文化与民族认同研究——中越边境苗族花山节案例

[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017,36(9):1081~ 1091.

[本文引用: 2]

边界是分割不同政治实体的界线,但国家对于边界的管治往往是有弹性的,因而孕育了丰富的&#x0201c;流动&#x0201d;,成为经济融合、社会交流与文化对话的重要场域。跨境民族是受其影响的典型群体,他们在原本生活区域被分隔的情况下,从未间断过跨境流动。总体来看,跨境流动过程中的文化认同及其形成机制是多元复杂的。本文以云南省河口县中越边境地区的苗族花山节为研究切入点,通过质性研究方法探讨节庆所折射的民族文化认同与国家认同的建构过程。研究发现:跨界的流动性加强了民族文化的交流与认同,共同促成了花山节的文化传承,维系了跨境民族的亲缘关系。这样的跨界流动亦强化了边界所形成的发展轨迹差异的感知,从而增强了中国籍苗族边民的国家认同与国家自豪感。

魏琳琳 .

蒙汉杂居区节庆仪式音乐中的地方性与族群认同

[J]. 中国音乐, 2020(1):44~ 49, 90.

[本文引用: 4]

温春来 .

彝、汉文献所见之彝族认同问题——兼与郝瑞教授对话

[J]. 民族研究, 2007(5):85~ 93.

[本文引用: 1]

/