Actor-Network Theory in Tourism Research over the Last Two Decades: Progress and Prospects

doi:10.12054/lydk.bisu.206

Tourism and Hospitality Prospects ›› 2022, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5): 69-92.DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.206

• Review Article • Previous Articles

Actor-Network Theory in Tourism Research over the Last Two Decades: Progress and Prospects

WANG Xiuqiong¹, HUANG Anqi¹, LIANG Xiaomei², WU Xiaojie³()

1. Department of Tourism Management, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
3. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China

Received:2021-09-14 Revised:2022-06-11 Online:2022-10-30 Published:2022-11-08

旅游研究中的行动者网络理论：应用进展及发展建议——以2000—2021年的文献为例

汪秀琼¹, 黄安琪¹, 梁肖梅², 吴小节³()

1.华南理工大学旅游管理系广东广州 510006
2.华南理工大学工商管理学院广东广州 510641
3.广东工业大学管理学院广东广州 510520

通讯作者: 吴小节（1980— ）,男,安徽安庆人,博士,广东工业大学管理学院副院长、教授、博士生导师,研究方向：企业管理。E-mail： xiaojie_wu@163.com
作者简介:汪秀琼（1983— ）,女,湖北咸宁人,博士,华南理工大学旅游管理系教授、博士生导师,研究方向：企业管理。
黄安琪（1997— ）,女,广东佛山人,华南理工大学旅游管理系硕士研究生,研究方向：旅游管理。
梁肖梅（1995— ）,女,广东佛山人,华南理工大学工商管理学院博士研究生,研究方向：企业管理。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金“中国企业对‘一带一路’沿线国家直接投资的制度复杂性及应对策略研究”(20BGL032);国家自然科学基金“中国企业跨国并购的制度复杂性与组织战略反应：动态演化、作用机制及其策略有效性研究”(71872053);广东省自然科学基金“资源和制度双重约束下中国民营企业OFD进入模式选择的影响机制”(2019A1515011944);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“制度差异方向、关系网络与跨国并购区位选择：基于‘一带一路’沿线国家的实证研究”(ZLTS2021009)

Abstract

Abstract:

The application of actor-network theory (ANT) in tourism research has been broadened. It reveals, through a unique methodological paradigm, the operational mode of an inter-relational network of key elements such as the environment, tourists, and tourism products. Taking 70 relevant papers on ANT published between 2000 and 2021 from the SSCI and CSSCI databases as samples, this paper conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) to summarize ANT in the field of tourism research based on five aspects: the number of published papers and publication distribution, types of papers, data acquisition methods, application of ANT in different tourism research topics, and differences between Chinese and English papers. The results show that the number of published papers follows a phased upward trend; the type of papers is mainly qualitative; and the main data acquisition methods comprise case studies, field investigations, and second-hand data. The research mainly focuses on theory and research development, heritage and environmental issues, tourism product development and planning, and rural tourism, as well as the differences in research foci and the application of ANT between Chinese and English literature. Based on a complete understanding of the application status of ANT in tourism research, this paper puts forward suggestions for future development, which can act as a reference and inspiration for follow-up research.

Key words: Actor-Network Theory, systematic literature review, tourism research, translation

摘要：

行动者网络理论（Actor-Network Theory,ANT）在旅游学科研究领域中的应用不断拓宽,并且以独特的方法论范式揭示了环境、旅游者、旅游产品等多重主体的关系网络运行模式。本文以2000—2021年SSCI、CSSCI数据库收录的70篇相关文献为样本,采用系统性文献回顾方法,从论文的发表数量与刊物分布、论文类型、数据获取方法、ANT在不同旅游研究主题中的应用、中英文文献的研究差异5个方面总结ANT在旅游研究中的应用现状。研究结果显示：论文发表数量呈阶段性上升趋势;论文类型以定性经验型为主;数据获取方法以案例研究、田野调查、二手数据等为主;研究主题聚焦在理论和研究发展、遗产和环境问题、旅游产品开发和规划、乡村旅游4个方面;中英文文献的研究主题及ANT应用深度存在差异。本研究提出了相应的发展建议,为后续研究提供了参考和启示。

关键词: 行动者网络理论, 系统性文献回顾, 旅游研究, 转译

CLC Number:

WANG Xiuqiong, HUANG Anqi, LIANG Xiaomei, WU Xiaojie. Actor-Network Theory in Tourism Research over the Last Two Decades: Progress and Prospects[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2022, 6(5): 69-92.

汪秀琼, 黄安琪, 梁肖梅, 吴小节. 旅游研究中的行动者网络理论：应用进展及发展建议——以2000—2021年的文献为例[J]. 旅游导刊, 2022, 6(5): 69-92.

Figures/Tables 9

References 83

[1]	Allen C D. On actor-network theory and landscape[J]. Area, 2011, 43(3):274-280.
[2]	Arnaboldi M, Spiller N. Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration:The case of cultural districts[J]. Tourism Management, 2011, 32(3):641-654.
[3]	Beard L, Scarles C, Tribe J. Mess and method:Using ANT in tourism research[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2016(60):97-110.
[4]	Benali A, Ren C. Lice work:Non-human trajectories in volunteer tourism[J]. Tourist Studies, 2019:1-20.
[5]	Berthon P, Nairn A, Money A. Through the paradigm funnel:A conceptual tool for literature analysis[J]. Marketing Education Review, 2003, 13(2):55-66.
[6]	Bridge G. On pragmatism,assemblage and ANT:Assembling reason[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2021, 45(3):417-435.
[7]	Buijtendijk H, Blom J, Vermeer J. Eco-innovation for sustainable tourism transitions as a process of collaborative co-production:The case of a carbon management calculator for the Dutch travel industry[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2018, 26(3):1-19.
[8]	Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation:Domestication of the scallops and fishmen of St. Brieuc Bay[M]//Law J.Power,Action,Belief. London: Routlege, 1986:196-223.
[9]	Chakraborty A. Emplacing non-human voices in tourism research:The role of dissensus as a qualitative method[J]. Tourism Geographies, 2021, 23(1-2):118-143.
[10]	Chen Y S, Wu S T. An exploration of Actor-Network Theory and social affordance for the development of a tourist attraction:A case study of a Jimmy-related theme park,Taiwan[J]. Tourism Management, 2021(82):1-12.
[11]	Chen Y S, Wu S T. Social networking practices of Viennese coffeehouse culture and intangible heritage tourism[J]. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 2017, 17(2):1-22.
[12]	Cloke P, Perkins H C. Cetacean performance and tourism in Kaikoura,New Zealand[J]. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 2005, 23(6):903-924.
[13]	Cohen E, Cohen S A. Current sociological theories and issues in tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2012, 39(4):2177-2202.
[14]	Dedeke A N. Creating sustainable tourism ventures in protected areas:An Actor-Network Theory analysis[J]. Tourism Management, 2017(61):161-172.
[15]	Ferdinand N, Williams N L. The making of the London Notting Hill Carnival festivalscape:Politics and power and the Notting Hill Carnival[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2018(27):33-46.
[16]	Franklin A. Tourism as an ordering:Towards a new ontology of tourism[J]. Tourist Studies, 2004, 4(3):277-301.
[17]	Gad C, Jensen C B. On the consequences of post-ANT[J]. Science,Technology,& Human Values, 2010, 35(1):55-80.
[18]	Goeldner C R, Ritchie J R B. Tourism:Principles,Practices,Philosophies[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,Inc, 2006:4-31.
[19]	Gren M, Huijbens E H. Tourism theory and the earth[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2012, 39(1):155-170.
[20]	Haug B. Enacting risk at Besseggen[M]// Van der Duim R, RenC B, JóhannessonG T. Actor-Network Theory and Tourism:Ordering, Materiality and Multiplicity. New York: Routledge, 2012:80-93.
[21]	Hummel J, Van der Duim R. SNV’s modes of ordering:Organizing tourism as development practice[J]. Tourism Management, 2016(57):312-322.
[22]	Jafari J, Ritchie J R B. Toward a framework for tourism education:Problems and prospects[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1981, 8(1):13-34.
[23]	Jesson J K, Matheson L, Lacey F M. Doing Your Literature Review:Traditional and Systematic Techniques[M]. Los Angeles: Sage, 2011:5-125.
[24]	Jóhannesson G T. “To get things done”:A relational approach to entrepreneurship[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 2012, 12(2):181-196.
[25]	Jóhannesson G T. Emergent vikings:The social ordering of tourism innovation[J]. Event Management, 2010, 14(4):261-274.
[26]	Jóhannesson G T. Tourism translations:Actor-network theory and tourism research[J]. Tourist Studies, 2005, 5(2):133-150.
[27]	Jørgensen M T. Reframing tourism distribution:Activity theory and actor-network theory[J]. Tourism Management, 2017(62):312-321.
[28]	Lugosi P. Socio-technological authentication[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2016, 58(5):100-113.
[29]	Mihalache M, Mihalache O R. A decisional framework of offshoring:Integrating insights from 25 years of research to provide direction for future[J]. Decision Sciences, 2016, 47(6):1103-1149.
[30]	Mordue T. Angling in modernity:A tour through society,nature and embodied passion[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2009, 12(5-6):529-552.
[31]	Müller M. A half-hearted romance? A diagnosis and agenda for the relationship between economic geography and actor-network theory (ANT)[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2015, 39(1):65-86.
[32]	Nairn A, Berthon P, Money A. Learning from giants:Exploring,classifying and analysing existing knowledge on market research[J]. International Journal of Market Research, 2007, 49(2):257-274.
[33]	Nguyen T Q T, Young T, Johnson P, et al. Conceptualising networks in sustainable tourism development[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2019(32):100575.
[34]	O’Neill P, Whatmore S. The business of place:Networks of property,partnership and produce[J]. Geoforum, 2000, 31(2):121-136.
[35]	Paget E, Dimanche F, Mounet J P. A tourism innovation case:An actor-network approach[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(3):828-847.
[36]	Park K, Park S, Lee T J. Analysis of a spatial network from the perspective of Actor‐Network Theory[J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2020:1-13.
[37]	Petersen M K, Ren C. “Much more than a song contest”:Exploring Eurovision 2014 as potlatch[J]. Valuation Studies, 2015, 3(2):97-118.
[38]	Pongajarn C, Van der Duim R, Peters K. Floating markets in Thailand:same,same,but different[J]. Journal of tourism and cultural change, 2016, 16(2):109-122.
[39]	Pongajarn C, Van der Duim R, Peters K. Reading postcards:Multiple enactments of tourism destinations. The case of Pai,Thailand[J]. International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 2014, 14(1):71-91.
[40]	Povilanskas R, Armaitienė A. Seaside resort-hinterland Nexus:Palanga,Lithuania[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(3):1156-1177.
[41]	Prayag G, Ozanne L K, Martin-Neuninger R, et al. Integrating MLP and “after ANT”to understand perceptions and responses of regime actors to Airbnb[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2020(1):1-18.
[42]	Rantisi N M, Leslie D. Circus in action:Exploring the role of a translation zone in the Cirque du Soleil’s creative practices[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 91(2):147-164.
[43]	Ren C. Beyond hosts and guests:Translating the concept of cultural misconception[J]. International Journal of Culture, 2010, 4(4):287-298.
[44]	Ren C, Pritchard A, Morgan N. Constructing tourism research:A critical inquiry[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(4):885-904.
[45]	Ren C. Non-human agency,radical ontology and tourism realities[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(3):858-881.
[46]	Rodger K, Moore S A, Newsome D. Wildlife tourism,science and actor-network theory[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2009, 36(4):645-666.
[47]	Sheehan R. Actor-network theory as a reflexive tool:(Inter) personal relations and relationships in the research process[J]. Area, 2011, 43(3):336-342.
[48]	Shimoyamada S. Hybrid production of gardens:An actor-network analysis of heterogeneous power relations[J]. Tourism Geographies, 2019, 21(2):195-213.
[49]	Stinson M J, Grimwood B S R. Defacing:Affect and situated knowledges within a rock climbing tourismscape[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020(2):1-18.
[50]	Sturød A G. From coal to cool:Reordering nature in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan[J]. Tourist Studies, 2019, 19(2):141-163.
[51]	Taş Gürsoy İ. Horse-drawn carriages:Sustainability at the nexus of human-animal interaction[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020a, 28(2):204-221.
[52]	Taş Gürsoy İ. Slow food justice and tourism:Tracing Karaklk bread in Seferihisar,Turkey[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020b(57):1-21.
[53]	Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review[J]. British Journal of Management, 2003, 14(3):207-222.
[54]	Tribe J, Liburd J J. The tourism knowledge system[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2016(57):44-61.
[55]	Tribe J. Tribes,territories and networks in the tourism academy[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(1):7-33.
[56]	Valkonen J. Acting in nature:Service events and agency in wilderness guiding[J]. Tourist Studies, 2009, 9(2):164-180.
[57]	Van der Duim R, Ampumuza C, Ahebwa W M. Gorilla tourism in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park,Uganda:An actor-network perspective[J]. Society & Natural Resources, 2014, 27(6):588-601.
[58]	Van der Duim R, Ren C, Jóhannesson G T. ANT:A decade of interfering with tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2017(64):139-149.
[59]	Van der Duim R, Ren C, Jóhannesson G T. and multiplicity:Enacting Actor-Network Theory in tourism[J]. Tourist Studies, 2013, 13(1):3-20.
[60]	Van der Duim R, Van Marwijk R. The implementation of an environmental management system for Dutch tour operators:An actor-network perspective[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2006, 14(5):449-472.
[61]	Van der Duim R. Tourismscapes:An actor-network perspective[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2007, 34(4):961-976.
[62]	Van der Duim V R, Caalders J. Tourism chains and pro-poor tourism development:An actor-network analysis of a pilot project in Costa Rica[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2008, 11(2):109-125.
[63]	Walsh N, Tucker H. Tourism “things”:The travelling performance of the backpack[J]. Tourist Studies, 2009, 9(3):223-239.
[64]	Xiao H G, Smith S L J. Case studies in tourism research:A state-of-the-art analysis[J]. Tourism Management, 2006, 27(5):738-749.
[65]	艾少伟, 苗长虹. 从“地方空间”、“流动空间”到“行动者网络空间”:ANT视角[J]. 人文地理, 2010, 25(2):43-49.
	[ AI Shaowei, MIAO Changhong. “Space of Places”“Space of Flows” and “Space of Actor-networks”:From the perspective of ANT[J]. Human Geography, 2010, 25(2):43-49.]
[66]	陈培培, 张敏. 从美丽乡村到都市居民消费空间——行动者网络理论与大世凹村的社会空间重构[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(8):1435-1446.
	[ CHEN Peipei, ZHANG Min. From beautiful village to urban residents’ consumption space:Actor-network theory and the social space reconstruction of Dashiao village[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(8):1435-1446.]
[67]	陈燕纯, 杨忍, 王敏. 基于行动者网络和共享经济视角的乡村民宿发展及空间重构——以深圳官湖村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5):718-730.
	[ CHEN Yanchun, YANG Ren, WANG Min. Development process of rural homestay tourism and spatial restructuring with the actor-network method from the perspective of shared economy:A case study of Guanhu village in Shenzhen[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5):718-730.]
[68]	胡晓亮, 李红波, 张小林, 等. 发达地区乡村空间商品化的过程与机制解析——以苏州市西巷村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1):171-182.
	[ HU Xaoliang, LI Hongbo, ZHANG Xiaolin, et al. Process and mechanism of the commodification of rural space in developed areas:A case study of Xixiang village in Suzhou City[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1):171-182.
[69]	黄甫全, 游景如, 涂丽娜, 等. 系统性文献综述法:案例、步骤与价值[J]. 电化教育研究, 2017, 38(11):11-18,25.
	[ HUANG Fuquan, YOU Jingru, TU Lina, et al. Systematic review methodology:Cases,procedures,and values[J]. E-education Research, 2017, 38(11):11-18,25.]
[70]	李立华, 付涤非, 刘睿. 旅游研究的空间转向——行动者网络理论视角的旅游研究述评[J]. 旅游学刊, 2014, 29(3):107-115.
	[ LI Lihua, FU Difei, LIU Rui. Spatial turn of tourism studies:A review on tourism studies from the perspective of the Actor-network theory[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2014, 29(3):107-115.]
[71]	李鹏, 张小敏, 陈慧. 行动者网络视域下世界遗产地的空间生产——以广东开平碉楼与村落为例[J]. 热带地理, 2014, 34(4):429-437.
	[ LI Peng, ZHANG Xiaomin, CHEN Hui. Production of world heritage based on Actor Network Theory:A case study of Kaiping Diaolou and Village in Guangdong[J]. Tropical Geography, 2014, 34(4):429-437.]
[72]	刘宣, 王小依. 行动者网络理论在人文地理领域应用研究述评[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(7):1139-1147.
	[ LIU Xuan, WANG Xiaoyi. A review on the application of actor network theory to human geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(7):1139-1147.]
[73]	王敏, 马纯莉, 朱竑. “互联网+”时代下的乡村地方品牌建构——以从化市良口镇三村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(1):115-122.
	[ WANG Min, MA Chunli, ZHU Hong. Rural local brand construction in “Internet+” era:Case study of Liangkou Town in Conghua[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(1):115-122.]
[74]	王鹏飞, 王瑞璠. 行动者网络理论与农村空间商品化——以北京市麻峪房村乡村旅游为例[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8):1408-1418.
	[ WANG Pengfei, WANG Ruifan. Actor network theory and commodification in rural space:A case study of Mayufang village in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8):1408-1418.]
[75]	王勇, 朱雅琴. 行动者网络视角下江南水乡古镇空间演化路径——以周庄古镇为例[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(6):76-84.
	[ WANG Yong, ZHU Yaqin. The spatial evolution path of ancient water towns in southern Yangtze River based on the actor-network perspective:A case study of Zhouzhuang ancient town[J]. Human Geography, 2020, 35(6):76-84.]
[76]	吴炆佳, 解佳, 孙九霞. 少数民族传统节事商品化:行动主体及微观权力运作[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(5):217-225.
	[ WU Wenjia, XIE Jia, SUN Jiuxia. The commercialization of minority ethnic traditional festivals:Actors and their micro-power practice[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(5):217-225.]
[77]	武常岐. 中国战略管理学研究的发展述评[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010, 13(6):25-40.
	[ WU Changqi. Strategic management research in China:Past,present and future[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2010, 13(6):25-40.]
[78]	许德音, 周长辉. 中国战略管理学研究现状评估[J]. 管理世界, 2004(5):76-87.
	[ XU Deyin, ZHOU Changhui. Strategic management research in China:An assessment[J]. Management World, 2004(5):76-87.]
[79]	杨忍, 徐茜, 周敬东, 等. 基于行动者网络理论的逢简村传统村落空间转型机制解析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(11):1817-1827.
	[ YANG Ren, XU Qian, ZHOU Jingdong, et al. Mechanism of rural space transformation in Fengjian ancient village of Shunde district,Foshan based on the actor network[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(11):1817-1827.]
[80]	袁超, 陈品宇, 孔翔, 等. 行动者网络理论与人文地理学的交互关系研究——重构、争辩与反思[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2):583-596.
	[ YUAN Chao, CHEN Pinyu, KONG Xiang, et al. Research on the interaction between Actor-Network Theory and human geography:Reconstruction,debate and reflection[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(2):583-596.]
[81]	张环宙, 周永广, 魏蕙雅, 等. 基于行动者网络理论的乡村旅游内生式发展的实证研究——以浙江浦江仙华山村为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2008, 23(2):65-71.
	[ ZHANG Huanzhou, ZHOU Yongguang, WEI Huiya, et al. An empirical study of rural tourism endogenous development based on Actor-Network Theory:A case of Xianhuashan Village,Pujiang County,Zhejiang Province[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2008, 23(2):65-71.]
[82]	郑辽吉. 丹东边境旅游产品创新与联合开发——基于行动者 - 网络理论观点[J]. 世界地理研究, 2009, 18(2):128-134.
	[ ZHENG Jiliao. Border tourism innovation:From actor-network perspective[J]. World Regional Studies, 2009, 18(2):128-134.]
[83]	朱峰, 保继刚, 项怡娴. 行动者网络理论(ANT)与旅游研究范式创新[J]. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(11):24-31.
	[ ZHU Feng, BAO Jigang, XIANG Yixian. Actor-network theory (ANT) and paradigm innovation for tourism research[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(11):24-31.]

对ANT的应用 Application to ANT	理论和研究发展主题下的学者和文章发表年份 Scholars and published years of literatures on theory and research development topic
视ANT为研究对象	Jóhannesson,2005;Sheehan,2011;朱峰、保继刚和项怡娴,2012;刘宣和王小依,2013;Van der Duim、Ren和Jóhannesson,2013;李立华、付涤非和刘睿,2014;Müller,2015;Beard、Scarles和Tribe,2016;Van der Duim、Ren和Jóhannesson,2017;袁超、陈品宇和孔翔等,2021
视ANT为研究视角	Franklin,2004;Van der Duim,2007;艾少伟和苗长虹,2010;Ren、Pritchard和Morgan,2010;Tribe,2010;Allen,2011;Gren和Huijbens,2012;Tribe和 Liburd,2016;Jørgensen,2017;Nguyen、Young和Johnson等,2019
视ANT为研究结果	Cohen E和Cohen S A,2012;Bridge,2021

对ANT的应用 Application to ANT	理论和研究发展主题下的学者和文章发表年份 Scholars and published years of literatures on theory and research development topic
视ANT为研究对象	Jóhannesson,2005;Sheehan,2011;朱峰、保继刚和项怡娴,2012;刘宣和王小依,2013;Van der Duim、Ren和Jóhannesson,2013;李立华、付涤非和刘睿,2014;Müller,2015;Beard、Scarles和Tribe,2016;Van der Duim、Ren和Jóhannesson,2017;袁超、陈品宇和孔翔等,2021
视ANT为研究视角	Franklin,2004;Van der Duim,2007;艾少伟和苗长虹,2010;Ren、Pritchard和Morgan,2010;Tribe,2010;Allen,2011;Gren和Huijbens,2012;Tribe和 Liburd,2016;Jørgensen,2017;Nguyen、Young和Johnson等,2019
视ANT为研究结果	Cohen E和Cohen S A,2012;Bridge,2021

对ANT的应用 Application to ANT	遗产和环境问题主题下的学者和文章发表年份 Scholars and published years of literatures on heritage and environment issues topic
转译和网络转换	Rodger、Moore和Newsome,2009;李鹏、张小敏和陈慧,2014;Chen和Wu,2017;王勇和朱雅琴,2020
排序、物质性和多样性	Van der Duim、Ampumuza和Ahebwa,2014;Taş Gürsoy,2020a/b
重视非人类的理念	Cloke和 Perkins,2005;Chakraborty,2021
集合的概念	Van der Duim和 Van Marwijk,2006;Valkonen,2009

对ANT的应用 Application to ANT	遗产和环境问题主题下的学者和文章发表年份 Scholars and published years of literatures on heritage and environment issues topic
转译和网络转换	Rodger、Moore和Newsome,2009;李鹏、张小敏和陈慧,2014;Chen和Wu,2017;王勇和朱雅琴,2020
排序、物质性和多样性	Van der Duim、Ampumuza和Ahebwa,2014;Taş Gürsoy,2020a/b
重视非人类的理念	Cloke和 Perkins,2005;Chakraborty,2021
集合的概念	Van der Duim和 Van Marwijk,2006;Valkonen,2009

对ANT的应用 Application to ANT	旅游产品开发和规划主题下的学者和文章发表年份 Scholars and published years of literatures on tourism product development and planning topic
转译	郑辽吉,2009;Paget、Dimanche和Mounet,2010;Arnaboldi和Spiller,2011;Povilanskas和Armaitienė,2011;Sturød,2019;吴炆佳、解佳和孙九霞,2019;
排序模式	Jóhannesson,2010,2012;
关系网络	O’Neill和Whatmore,2000;Chen和Wu,2021

Actor-Network Theory in Tourism Research over the Last Two Decades: Progress and Prospects

旅游研究中的行动者网络理论：应用进展及发展建议——以2000—2021年的文献为例

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 83

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

范式漏斗层级 Paradigm funnel level	数量/篇 Amount	占比/ % Percentage	论文的作者和发表年份 Authors and published years
层级1 实证观察	48	68.6	O’Neill和Whatmore,2000;Cloke和 Perkins,2005;Van der Duim和Van Marwijk,2006;Van der Duim和 Caalders,2008;张环宙、周永广和魏蕙雅等,2008;Mordue,2009;Rodger、Moore和Newsome,2009;Walsh和Tucker,2009;郑辽吉,2009;Valkonen,2009;Jóhannesson,2010; Paget、Dimanche和Mounet,2010;Ren、Pritchard和Morgan,2010;Ren,2010;Arnaboldi和Spiller,2011;Ren,2011;Povilanskas和Armaitienė,2011;Jóhannesson,2012;李鹏、张小敏和陈慧,2014;Pongajarn、Van der Duim和Peters,2014;Rantisi和Leslie,2015;Van der Duim、Ampumuza和Ahebwa,2014;陈培培和张敏,2015;Petersen和Ren,2015;Hummel和 Van der Duim,2016;Pongajarn、Van der Duim和Peters,2016;Chen和Wu,2017;Dedeke,2017;王鹏飞和王瑞璠,2017;王敏、马纯莉和朱竑,2017;Buijtendijk、Blom和Vermeer,2018;陈燕纯、杨忍和王敏,2018;Ferdinand和Williams,2018;杨忍、徐茜和周敬东等,2018;Benali和Ren,2019;Shimoyamada,2019;Sturød,2019;吴炆佳、解佳和孙九霞,2019;TaşGürsoy,2020a/b;Park K、Park S和Lee,2020;Prayag、Ozanne和Martin-Neuninger等,2020;Stinson和Grimwood,2020;王勇和朱雅琴,2020;Chakraborty,2021;Chen和Wu,2021;胡晓亮、李红波和张小林等,2021
层级2 分析方法	12	17.1	Jóhannesson,2005;Sheehan,2011;Cohen和 Cohen,2012;朱峰、保继刚和项怡娴,2012;刘宣和王小依,2013;Van der Duim、Ren和Jóhannesson,2013;李立华、付涤非和刘睿,2014;Müller,2015;Beard、Scarles和Tribe,2016;Van der Duim、Ren和Jóhannesson,2017;Bridge,2021;袁超、陈品宇和孔翔等,2021
层级3 具体理论	4	5.7	Tribe,2010;Tribe和 Liburd,2016;Jørgensen,2017;Nguyen、Young和Johnson等,2019
层级4 核心假设	6	8.6	Franklin,2004;Van der Duim,2007;艾少伟和苗长虹,2010;Allen,2011;Gren和 Huijbens,2012;Lugosi,2016
总计	70	100

[1]	LI Bin, WANG Sha, WANG Jiexiang, LI Liang, YU Zhiyuan, GONG Yitong. Do Rigorous and Disciplined Grounded Theory Research and Case Study [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2024, 8(1): 1-29.
[2]	ZHAO Hongmei. The Characteristics of Western Anthropology of Tourism in the Pre-Paradigm Phase: A Glimpse into the First Decade of Annals of Tourism Research [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2022, 6(6): 1-20.
[3]	DAI Bin. A Baconian Approach to Tourism Research and the NOMA Principle of Theoretical Construction [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2022, 6(5): 1-11.
[4]	XUE Yumeng, ZHOU Yongbo, LI Dongye. The Construction of Scenes and National Amenities: An Analytical Perspective on Conceptual Transformation [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2022, 6(5): 28-49.
[5]	ZHENG Weimin,LI Mengling,ZHUANG Xinyi,GAO Shengnan. A Review on the Application of Mobile Phone Positioning Data in Tourism [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2021, 5(4): 37-57.
[6]	Jiuxia SUN. Knowledge Spillover from Anthropology to Tourism Research [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2019, 3(5): 1-14.
[7]	Hongni WEI, Hong ZHU. Academic Trends in Tourism Studies:An Analysis based on Annals of Tourism Research [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2018, 2(3): 41-65.
[8]	Jianmin HE. On the Characteristics, Questions, Methods and Appraisal of Tourism Research: Learning from Leading Economists and Management Research Scholars [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2018, 2(2): 5-11.
[9]	Ning DENG. PMMS：A Photo based Metadata Mining System for Tourism Research [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2017, 1(6): 34-47.