微信公众号
编辑部微信号
旅游导刊 ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (5): 43-71.DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.304
收稿日期:2024-11-25
修回日期:2025-06-10
出版日期:2025-10-30
发布日期:2025-11-25
作者简介:刘林艳(1985— ),女,安徽淮北人,北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院会展系教授,研究方向为服务化、商业模式创新、绿色展览等,E-mail:liulinyan_99@126.com;基金资助:
LIU Linyan(
), CHENG Shilin, PANG Wenya, LIU Zizhen
Received:2024-11-25
Revised:2025-06-10
Online:2025-10-30
Published:2025-11-25
摘要:
在当前数字化转型加速的背景下,创新成为展览企业持续发展的核心动力。然而,现有研究多聚焦于传统创新机制,较少关注数字化情境下展览企业的组织创新氛围对双元创新的影响。因此,本研究以双元创新理论为基础,构建包含数字赋能的分析模型,通过实证研究探究组织创新氛围对双元创新及创新绩效的影响。研究发现:(1)组织创新氛围显著正向影响企业的创新绩效提升;(2)组织创新氛围通过双元创新的中介作用影响创新绩效;(3)数字赋能正向调节组织创新氛围和双元创新的关系,其中,分析能力强化组织支持对利用式创新的正向影响,连接能力显著调节团队协作与利用式创新的关系。本文拓展了双元创新在数字化情境下的应用场景,为展览行业企业构建创新氛围、提升数字化能力与创新绩效提供了理论支持与实践启示。
中图分类号:
刘林艳, 程世林, 庞文雅, 刘子禛. 组织创新氛围对展览企业双元创新的影响研究——数字赋能的调节作用[J]. 旅游导刊, 2025, 9(5): 43-71.
LIU Linyan, CHENG Shilin, PANG Wenya, LIU Zizhen. Influence of Organizational Innovation Climate on Dual Innovation of Exhibition Enterprises: The Moderating Effect of Digital Empowerment[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2025, 9(5): 43-71.
| 变量 Variable | 属性 Attribute | 频数 Amount | 占比/% Proportion | 变量 Variable | 属性 Attribute | 频数 Amount | 占比/% Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公司成立年限 Company establishment years | 0~5年 | 61 | 19.3 | 性别 Gender | 女 | 172 | 54.4 |
| 5~10年 | 124 | 39.2 | |||||
| 10~20年 | 93 | 29.4 | 男 | 144 | 45.6 | ||
| 20年以上 | 38 | 12.1 | |||||
| 员工数量 The number of employees | 50人及以下 | 74 | 23.4 | 受教育水平 Education level | 高中及以下 | 38 | 12.0 |
| 51~100人 | 187 | 59.2 | 专科 | 70 | 22.2 | ||
| 101~300人 | 40 | 12.7 | 本科 | 169 | 53.5 | ||
| 301人及以上 | 15 | 4.7 | 硕士及以上 | 39 | 12.3 | ||
| 公司性质 The nature of company | 国有或国有控股企业 | 35 | 11.1 | 年龄 Age | 18~30岁 | 19 | 6.0 |
| 民营或民营控股企业 | 111 | 35.1 | 31~40岁 | 87 | 27.5 | ||
| 中外合资企业 | 89 | 28.2 | 41~50岁 | 123 | 38.9 | ||
| 外商独资企业 | 62 | 19.6 | 51~60岁 | 60 | 19.1 | ||
| 其他企业 | 19 | 6.0 | 60岁以上 | 27 | 8.5 | ||
| 从业年限 Length of service | 1年以内 | 6 | 1.9 | 职位层级 Position level | |||
| 1~3年 | 4 | 1.2 | 普通员工 | 4 | 1.3 | ||
| 3~5年 | 6 | 1.9 | 基层管理者 | 44 | 13.9 | ||
| 5~10年 | 193 | 61.1 | 中层管理者 | 191 | 60.4 | ||
| 10年以上 | 107 | 33.9 | 高层管理者 | 77 | 24.4 |
表1 样本的变量属性分布及频数统计
Tab. 1 Statistics of variables, attributes, frequencies and proportions of survey samples
| 变量 Variable | 属性 Attribute | 频数 Amount | 占比/% Proportion | 变量 Variable | 属性 Attribute | 频数 Amount | 占比/% Proportion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公司成立年限 Company establishment years | 0~5年 | 61 | 19.3 | 性别 Gender | 女 | 172 | 54.4 |
| 5~10年 | 124 | 39.2 | |||||
| 10~20年 | 93 | 29.4 | 男 | 144 | 45.6 | ||
| 20年以上 | 38 | 12.1 | |||||
| 员工数量 The number of employees | 50人及以下 | 74 | 23.4 | 受教育水平 Education level | 高中及以下 | 38 | 12.0 |
| 51~100人 | 187 | 59.2 | 专科 | 70 | 22.2 | ||
| 101~300人 | 40 | 12.7 | 本科 | 169 | 53.5 | ||
| 301人及以上 | 15 | 4.7 | 硕士及以上 | 39 | 12.3 | ||
| 公司性质 The nature of company | 国有或国有控股企业 | 35 | 11.1 | 年龄 Age | 18~30岁 | 19 | 6.0 |
| 民营或民营控股企业 | 111 | 35.1 | 31~40岁 | 87 | 27.5 | ||
| 中外合资企业 | 89 | 28.2 | 41~50岁 | 123 | 38.9 | ||
| 外商独资企业 | 62 | 19.6 | 51~60岁 | 60 | 19.1 | ||
| 其他企业 | 19 | 6.0 | 60岁以上 | 27 | 8.5 | ||
| 从业年限 Length of service | 1年以内 | 6 | 1.9 | 职位层级 Position level | |||
| 1~3年 | 4 | 1.2 | 普通员工 | 4 | 1.3 | ||
| 3~5年 | 6 | 1.9 | 基层管理者 | 44 | 13.9 | ||
| 5~10年 | 193 | 61.1 | 中层管理者 | 191 | 60.4 | ||
| 10年以上 | 107 | 33.9 | 高层管理者 | 77 | 24.4 |
| 变量名称 Variable | 题项 Item | 因子载荷 Factor loading | Cronbach’s α | KMO | CR | AVE | 整体拟合指数 Overall fit index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational innovation climate | 组织支持 Organizational support | OS1 | 0.793 | 0.842 | 0.820 | 0.843 | 0.572 | x²/df=1.094(<3),RMSEA= 0.017(<0.05),GFI=0.888(>0.8),CFI=0.989(>0.8),NFI=0.884(>0.8), |
| OS2 | 0.734 | |||||||
| OS3 | 0.747 | |||||||
| OS4 | 0.751 | |||||||
| 团队协作 Team collaboration | TW1 | 0.848 | 0.875 | 0.832 | 0.876 | 0.638 | ||
| TW2 | 0.788 | |||||||
| TW3 | 0.760 | |||||||
| TW4 | 0.797 | |||||||
| 自主工作 Autonomous work | AW1 | 0.768 | 0.843 | 0.821 | 0.843 | 0.574 | ||
| AW2 | 0.752 | |||||||
| AW3 | 0.759 | |||||||
| AW4 | 0.751 | |||||||
| 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | EI1 | 0.707 | 0.871 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.577 | |
| EI2 | 0.754 | |||||||
| EI3 | 0.748 | |||||||
| EI4 | 0.758 | |||||||
| EI5 | 0.825 | |||||||
| 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | E_I1 | 0.766 | 0.875 | 0.873 | 0.875 | 0.584 | ||
| E_I2 | 0.785 | |||||||
| E_I3 | 0.816 | |||||||
| E_I4 | 0.733 | |||||||
| E_I5 | 0.718 | |||||||
| 创新绩效 Innovation performance | 创新绩效 Innovation performance | IP1 | 0.784 | 0.900 | 0.910 | 0.900 | 0.601 | |
| IP2 | 0.798 | |||||||
| IP3 | 0.770 | |||||||
| IP4 | 0.757 | |||||||
| IP5 | 0.741 | |||||||
| IP6 | 0.801 | |||||||
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 分析能力 Analytical capability | AC1 | 0.788 | 0.840 | 0.816 | 0.841 | 0.841 | |
| AC2 | 0.747 | |||||||
| AC3 | 0.713 | |||||||
| AC4 | 0.769 | |||||||
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 连接能力 Connective capability | CC1 | 0.758 | 0.870 | 0.869 | 0.871 | 0.871 | |
| CC2 | 0.790 | |||||||
| CC3 | 0.722 | IFI=0.989(>0.8),TLI=0.988(>0.8) | ||||||
| CC4 | 0.738 | |||||||
| CC5 | 0.777 | |||||||
| 智能能力 Intelligent capability | IC1 | 0.792 | 0.844 | 0.816 | 0.844 | 0.844 | ||
| IC2 | 0.726 | |||||||
| IC3 | 0.754 | |||||||
| IC4 | 0.762 | |||||||
表2 各变量信效度检验结果
Tab. 2 Results of reliability and validity tests for each variable
| 变量名称 Variable | 题项 Item | 因子载荷 Factor loading | Cronbach’s α | KMO | CR | AVE | 整体拟合指数 Overall fit index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational innovation climate | 组织支持 Organizational support | OS1 | 0.793 | 0.842 | 0.820 | 0.843 | 0.572 | x²/df=1.094(<3),RMSEA= 0.017(<0.05),GFI=0.888(>0.8),CFI=0.989(>0.8),NFI=0.884(>0.8), |
| OS2 | 0.734 | |||||||
| OS3 | 0.747 | |||||||
| OS4 | 0.751 | |||||||
| 团队协作 Team collaboration | TW1 | 0.848 | 0.875 | 0.832 | 0.876 | 0.638 | ||
| TW2 | 0.788 | |||||||
| TW3 | 0.760 | |||||||
| TW4 | 0.797 | |||||||
| 自主工作 Autonomous work | AW1 | 0.768 | 0.843 | 0.821 | 0.843 | 0.574 | ||
| AW2 | 0.752 | |||||||
| AW3 | 0.759 | |||||||
| AW4 | 0.751 | |||||||
| 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | EI1 | 0.707 | 0.871 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.577 | |
| EI2 | 0.754 | |||||||
| EI3 | 0.748 | |||||||
| EI4 | 0.758 | |||||||
| EI5 | 0.825 | |||||||
| 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | E_I1 | 0.766 | 0.875 | 0.873 | 0.875 | 0.584 | ||
| E_I2 | 0.785 | |||||||
| E_I3 | 0.816 | |||||||
| E_I4 | 0.733 | |||||||
| E_I5 | 0.718 | |||||||
| 创新绩效 Innovation performance | 创新绩效 Innovation performance | IP1 | 0.784 | 0.900 | 0.910 | 0.900 | 0.601 | |
| IP2 | 0.798 | |||||||
| IP3 | 0.770 | |||||||
| IP4 | 0.757 | |||||||
| IP5 | 0.741 | |||||||
| IP6 | 0.801 | |||||||
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 分析能力 Analytical capability | AC1 | 0.788 | 0.840 | 0.816 | 0.841 | 0.841 | |
| AC2 | 0.747 | |||||||
| AC3 | 0.713 | |||||||
| AC4 | 0.769 | |||||||
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 连接能力 Connective capability | CC1 | 0.758 | 0.870 | 0.869 | 0.871 | 0.871 | |
| CC2 | 0.790 | |||||||
| CC3 | 0.722 | IFI=0.989(>0.8),TLI=0.988(>0.8) | ||||||
| CC4 | 0.738 | |||||||
| CC5 | 0.777 | |||||||
| 智能能力 Intelligent capability | IC1 | 0.792 | 0.844 | 0.816 | 0.844 | 0.844 | ||
| IC2 | 0.726 | |||||||
| IC3 | 0.754 | |||||||
| IC4 | 0.762 | |||||||
| 变量 Variable | 组织 支持 | 团队 协作 | 自主 工作 | 探索式 创新 | 利用式 创新 | 创新绩效 | 分析能力 | 连接 能力 | 智能 能力 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 组织支持 | |||||||||
| 团队协作 | 0.334** | ||||||||
| 自主工作 | 0.307** | 0.369** | |||||||
| 探索式创新 | 0.341** | 0.296** | 0.375** | ||||||
| 利用式创新 | 0.338** | 0.433** | 0.362** | 0.290** | |||||
| 创新绩效 | 0.376** | 0.328** | 0.346** | 0.312** | 0.269** | ||||
| 分析能力 | 0.277** | 0.345** | 0.244** | 0.285** | 0.250** | 0.329** | |||
| 连接能力 | 0.413** | 0.380** | 0.409** | 0.305** | 0.325** | 0.404** | 0.327** | ||
| 智能能力 | 0.261** | 0.338** | 0.260** | 0.355** | 0.278** | 0.323** | 0.325** | 0.276** |
表3 相关性分析
Tab. 3 Correlation analysis
| 变量 Variable | 组织 支持 | 团队 协作 | 自主 工作 | 探索式 创新 | 利用式 创新 | 创新绩效 | 分析能力 | 连接 能力 | 智能 能力 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 组织支持 | |||||||||
| 团队协作 | 0.334** | ||||||||
| 自主工作 | 0.307** | 0.369** | |||||||
| 探索式创新 | 0.341** | 0.296** | 0.375** | ||||||
| 利用式创新 | 0.338** | 0.433** | 0.362** | 0.290** | |||||
| 创新绩效 | 0.376** | 0.328** | 0.346** | 0.312** | 0.269** | ||||
| 分析能力 | 0.277** | 0.345** | 0.244** | 0.285** | 0.250** | 0.329** | |||
| 连接能力 | 0.413** | 0.380** | 0.409** | 0.305** | 0.325** | 0.404** | 0.327** | ||
| 智能能力 | 0.261** | 0.338** | 0.260** | 0.355** | 0.278** | 0.323** | 0.325** | 0.276** |
| 模型 Model | 变量 Variable | 未标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficient | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Sig. | 共线性统计 Collinearity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 标准误差 | β | 容差 | VIF | ||||||
| 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | 常数 | 1.366 | 0.218 | 6.267 | 0.000 | |||||
| 组织支持 | 0.213 | 0.053 | 0.219*** | 4.009 | 0.000 | 0.850 | 1.177 | |||
| 团队协作 | 0.115 | 0.051 | 0.126* | 2.262 | 0.024 | 0.810 | 1.234 | |||
| 自主工作 | 0.255 | 0.054 | 0.262*** | 4.724 | 0.000 | 0.826 | 1.211 | |||
| DW | 1.907 | |||||||||
| 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | 常数 | 1.092 | 0.217 | 5.030 | 0.000 | |||||
| 组织支持 | 0.178 | 0.053 | 0.178** | 3.369 | 0.001 | 0.850 | 1.177 | |||
| 团队协作 | 0.283 | 0.051 | 0.301*** | 5.567 | 0.000 | 0.810 | 1.234 | |||
| 自主工作 | 0.197 | 0.054 | 0.197*** | 3.671 | 0.000 | 0.826 | 1.211 | |||
| DW | 1.925 | |||||||||
表4 组织创新氛围各维度对探索式和利用式创新回归模型分析
Tab. 4 Regression model analysis of dimensions of organizational innovation climate on exploratory innovation, and exploitative innovation
| 模型 Model | 变量 Variable | 未标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficient | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Sig. | 共线性统计 Collinearity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 标准误差 | β | 容差 | VIF | ||||||
| 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | 常数 | 1.366 | 0.218 | 6.267 | 0.000 | |||||
| 组织支持 | 0.213 | 0.053 | 0.219*** | 4.009 | 0.000 | 0.850 | 1.177 | |||
| 团队协作 | 0.115 | 0.051 | 0.126* | 2.262 | 0.024 | 0.810 | 1.234 | |||
| 自主工作 | 0.255 | 0.054 | 0.262*** | 4.724 | 0.000 | 0.826 | 1.211 | |||
| DW | 1.907 | |||||||||
| 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | 常数 | 1.092 | 0.217 | 5.030 | 0.000 | |||||
| 组织支持 | 0.178 | 0.053 | 0.178** | 3.369 | 0.001 | 0.850 | 1.177 | |||
| 团队协作 | 0.283 | 0.051 | 0.301*** | 5.567 | 0.000 | 0.810 | 1.234 | |||
| 自主工作 | 0.197 | 0.054 | 0.197*** | 3.671 | 0.000 | 0.826 | 1.211 | |||
| DW | 1.925 | |||||||||
| 变量 Variable | 未标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficient | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 标准误差 | β | ||||
| 常数 Constant | 1.236 | 0.223 | 5.544 | 0.000 | ||
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational Innovation climate | 0.617 | 0.066 | 0.468*** | 9.383 | 0.000 | |
表5 组织创新氛围对创新绩效回归模型分析
Tab.5 Regression model analysis of organizational innovation climate on innovation performance
| 变量 Variable | 未标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficient | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 标准误差 | β | ||||
| 常数 Constant | 1.236 | 0.223 | 5.544 | 0.000 | ||
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational Innovation climate | 0.617 | 0.066 | 0.468*** | 9.383 | 0.000 | |
| 变量 Variable | 未标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficient | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Sig. | 共线性统计 Collinearity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 标准误差 | β | 容差 | VIF | ||||
| 常数 Constant | 1.217 | 0.224 | 5.436 | 0.000 | ||||
| 组织支持 Organizational support | 0.259 | 0.055 | 0.257*** | 4.755 | 0.000 | 0.850 | 1.177 | |
| 团队协作 Team collaboration | 0.157 | 0.052 | 0.166** | 2.993 | 0.003 | 0.810 | 1.234 | |
| 自主工作 Autonomous work | 0.208 | 0.055 | 0.206*** | 3.753 | 0.000 | 0.826 | 1.211 | |
| DW | 1.667 | |||||||
表6 组织创新氛围各维度对创新绩效回归模型分析
Tab. 6 Regression model analysis of dimensions of organizational innovation climate on innovation performance
| 变量 Variable | 未标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficient | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Sig. | 共线性统计 Collinearity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 标准误差 | β | 容差 | VIF | ||||
| 常数 Constant | 1.217 | 0.224 | 5.436 | 0.000 | ||||
| 组织支持 Organizational support | 0.259 | 0.055 | 0.257*** | 4.755 | 0.000 | 0.850 | 1.177 | |
| 团队协作 Team collaboration | 0.157 | 0.052 | 0.166** | 2.993 | 0.003 | 0.810 | 1.234 | |
| 自主工作 Autonomous work | 0.208 | 0.055 | 0.206*** | 3.753 | 0.000 | 0.826 | 1.211 | |
| DW | 1.667 | |||||||
| 变量 Variable | 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | 创新绩效 Innovation performance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | se | t | β | se | t | ||
| 常数 constant | 1.230 1*** | 0.159 4 | 7.715 3 | 1.037 6*** | 0.242 0 | 4.287 9 | |
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational innovation climate | 0.620 0*** | 0.047 0 | 13.179 3 | 0.517 3*** | 0.081 6 | 6.340 0 | |
| 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | / | / | / | 0.161 6* | 0.078 5 | 2.057 4 | |
| 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | / | / | / | 0.321 0*** | 0.056 0 | 5.817 0 | |
| 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | / | / | / | 0.269 0*** | 0.055 0 | 4.947 0 | |
表7 中介效应分析
Tab. 7 Mediation effect analysis
| 变量 Variable | 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | 创新绩效 Innovation performance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | se | t | β | se | t | ||
| 常数 constant | 1.230 1*** | 0.159 4 | 7.715 3 | 1.037 6*** | 0.242 0 | 4.287 9 | |
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational innovation climate | 0.620 0*** | 0.047 0 | 13.179 3 | 0.517 3*** | 0.081 6 | 6.340 0 | |
| 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | / | / | / | 0.161 6* | 0.078 5 | 2.057 4 | |
| 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | / | / | / | 0.321 0*** | 0.056 0 | 5.817 0 | |
| 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | / | / | / | 0.269 0*** | 0.055 0 | 4.947 0 | |
| 效应 Effect | se | t | 置信区间下限 LLCI | 置信区间上限 ULCI | 效应占比 Effect proportion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总效应 Total effect | 0.617 5 | 0.065 8 | 9.383 3 | 0.488 0 | 0.746 9 | 100% |
| 直接效应 Direct effect | 0.517 3 | 0.081 6 | 6.340 0 | 0.356 7 | 0.677 8 | 83.77% |
| 间接效应 Indirect effect | 0.100 2 | 0.050 3 | / | 0.002 7 | 0.199 9 | 16.23% |
表8 中介效应占比
Tab. 8 Proportion of mediation effect
| 效应 Effect | se | t | 置信区间下限 LLCI | 置信区间上限 ULCI | 效应占比 Effect proportion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总效应 Total effect | 0.617 5 | 0.065 8 | 9.383 3 | 0.488 0 | 0.746 9 | 100% |
| 直接效应 Direct effect | 0.517 3 | 0.081 6 | 6.340 0 | 0.356 7 | 0.677 8 | 83.77% |
| 间接效应 Indirect effect | 0.100 2 | 0.050 3 | / | 0.002 7 | 0.199 9 | 16.23% |
| 变量 Variable | 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| β | se | t | |
| 常数 Constant | 3.212 5*** | 0.040 1 | 80.151 4 |
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational innovation climate | 0.439 7*** | 0.057 8 | 7.608 8 |
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 0.237 6*** | 0.060 4 | 3.933 3 |
| 组织创新氛围×数字赋能 OIC×DE | 0.244 8** | 0.081 0 | 3.019 9 |
| R-sq | 0.408 4 | ||
| F | 71.798 6 | ||
表9 数字赋能调节效应分析
Tab. 9 Analysis of the moderating effect of digital empowerment
| 变量 Variable | 双元创新 Ambidextrous innovation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| β | se | t | |
| 常数 Constant | 3.212 5*** | 0.040 1 | 80.151 4 |
| 组织创新氛围 Organizational innovation climate | 0.439 7*** | 0.057 8 | 7.608 8 |
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 0.237 6*** | 0.060 4 | 3.933 3 |
| 组织创新氛围×数字赋能 OIC×DE | 0.244 8** | 0.081 0 | 3.019 9 |
| R-sq | 0.408 4 | ||
| F | 71.798 6 | ||
| 变量 Variable | 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | se | t | β | se | t | ||
| 常数 Constant | 3.278 4*** | 0.049 2 | 66.627 8 | 3.230 3*** | 0.050 3 | 64.164 4 | |
| 组织支持 Organizational support | 0.271 4*** | 0.052 8 | 5.145 4 | 0.275 8*** | 0.054 0 | 5.109 3 | |
| 分析能力 Analytical capability | 0.209 5*** | 0.054 4 | 3.848 6 | 0.181 5** | 0.055 7 | 3.259 3 | |
| 组织支持×分析能力 OS×AC | 0.056 7 | 0.057 0 | 0.995 4 | 0.194 4** | 0.058 3 | 3.334 0 | |
| R-sq | 0.158 5 | 0.170 6 | |||||
| F | 19.583 1 | 21.391 4 | |||||
| 常数 Constant | 3.253 9*** | 0.051 7 | 69.201 7 | 3.229 8*** | 0.050 4 | 64.116 8 | |
| 团队协作 Team collaboration | 0.182 0*** | 0.052 1 | 5.808 8 | 0.327 6*** | 0.050 7 | 6.456 0 | |
| 连接能力 Connective capability | 0.212 4*** | 0.056 9 | 5.177 3 | 0.178 6** | 0.055 5 | 3.218 1 | |
| 团队协作×连接能力 TC×CC | 0.109 2 | 0.056 4 | 1.091 3 | 0.133 1* | 0.055 0 | 2.421 7 | |
| R-sq | 0.158 1 | 0.231 8 | |||||
| F | 29.393 0 | 31.382 2 | |||||
| 常数 Constant | 3.278 3*** | 0.047 4 | 69.201 7 | 3.267 3*** | 0.050 2 | 65.024 4 | |
| 自主工作 Autonomous work | 0.294 0*** | 0.050 6 | 5.808 8 | 0.311 0*** | 0.053 7 | 5.793 8 | |
| 智能能力 Intelligent capacity | 0.262 6*** | 0.050 7 | 5.177 3 | 0.193 4*** | 0.053 8 | 3.594 8 | |
| 自主工作×智能能力 AW×IC | 0.058 9 | 0.054 0 | 1.091 3 | 0.037 9 | 0.057 3 | 0.661 1 | |
| R-sq | 0.214 8 | 0.168 4 | |||||
| F | 28.458 3 | 21.053 3 | |||||
表10 数字赋能各维度调节效应分析
Tab. 10 Analysis of the moderating effects of dimensions of digital empowerment
| 变量 Variable | 探索式创新 Exploratory innovation | 利用式创新 Exploitative innovation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | se | t | β | se | t | ||
| 常数 Constant | 3.278 4*** | 0.049 2 | 66.627 8 | 3.230 3*** | 0.050 3 | 64.164 4 | |
| 组织支持 Organizational support | 0.271 4*** | 0.052 8 | 5.145 4 | 0.275 8*** | 0.054 0 | 5.109 3 | |
| 分析能力 Analytical capability | 0.209 5*** | 0.054 4 | 3.848 6 | 0.181 5** | 0.055 7 | 3.259 3 | |
| 组织支持×分析能力 OS×AC | 0.056 7 | 0.057 0 | 0.995 4 | 0.194 4** | 0.058 3 | 3.334 0 | |
| R-sq | 0.158 5 | 0.170 6 | |||||
| F | 19.583 1 | 21.391 4 | |||||
| 常数 Constant | 3.253 9*** | 0.051 7 | 69.201 7 | 3.229 8*** | 0.050 4 | 64.116 8 | |
| 团队协作 Team collaboration | 0.182 0*** | 0.052 1 | 5.808 8 | 0.327 6*** | 0.050 7 | 6.456 0 | |
| 连接能力 Connective capability | 0.212 4*** | 0.056 9 | 5.177 3 | 0.178 6** | 0.055 5 | 3.218 1 | |
| 团队协作×连接能力 TC×CC | 0.109 2 | 0.056 4 | 1.091 3 | 0.133 1* | 0.055 0 | 2.421 7 | |
| R-sq | 0.158 1 | 0.231 8 | |||||
| F | 29.393 0 | 31.382 2 | |||||
| 常数 Constant | 3.278 3*** | 0.047 4 | 69.201 7 | 3.267 3*** | 0.050 2 | 65.024 4 | |
| 自主工作 Autonomous work | 0.294 0*** | 0.050 6 | 5.808 8 | 0.311 0*** | 0.053 7 | 5.793 8 | |
| 智能能力 Intelligent capacity | 0.262 6*** | 0.050 7 | 5.177 3 | 0.193 4*** | 0.053 8 | 3.594 8 | |
| 自主工作×智能能力 AW×IC | 0.058 9 | 0.054 0 | 1.091 3 | 0.037 9 | 0.057 3 | 0.661 1 | |
| R-sq | 0.214 8 | 0.168 4 | |||||
| F | 28.458 3 | 21.053 3 | |||||
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 效应 Effect | 标准误差 se | 置信区间下限 LLCI | 置信区间上限 ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-1SD | 0.044 3 | 0.025 0 | -0.000 1 | 0.098 3 |
| M | 0.071 0 | 0.035 6 | 0.002 4 | 0.141 6 |
| M+SD | 0.097 8 | 0.051 0 | 0.003 0 | 0.200 7 |
| 调节中介效应 Moderated mediation effect | 0.039 5 | 0.027 6 | 0.000 2 | 0.106 3 |
表11 有调节的中介效应分析
Tab. 11 Analysis of moderated mediation effect
| 数字赋能 Digital empowerment | 效应 Effect | 标准误差 se | 置信区间下限 LLCI | 置信区间上限 ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-1SD | 0.044 3 | 0.025 0 | -0.000 1 | 0.098 3 |
| M | 0.071 0 | 0.035 6 | 0.002 4 | 0.141 6 |
| M+SD | 0.097 8 | 0.051 0 | 0.003 0 | 0.200 7 |
| 调节中介效应 Moderated mediation effect | 0.039 5 | 0.027 6 | 0.000 2 | 0.106 3 |
图2 数字赋能对组织创新氛围与双元创新关系的调节效应
Fig. 2 The moderating effect of digital empowerment on the relationship between organizational innovation climate and ambidextrous innovation
| [1] | Alpkan L, Bulut C, Gunday G, et al. Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance[J]. Management Decision, 2010, 48(5): 732-755. |
| [2] | Amabile T M, Conti R, Coon H, et al. Assessing the work environment for creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(5): 1154-1184. |
| [3] | Bao X N, Li Y R, Zhang S C. Knowledge map analysis of digital empowerment theme under the background of big data[EB/OL]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10154892, 2024-10-10. |
| [4] | Bauer T, Borodako K. Trade show innovations-organizers implementation of the new service development process[J]. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 2019, 41: 197-207. |
| [5] | Bell G G. Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 287-295. |
| [6] | Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2): 238-256. |
| [7] | Ceptureanu S I, Ceptureanu E G. Innovation ambidexterity effects on product innovation performance: The mediating role of decentralization[J]. Kybernetes, 2023, 52(5): 1698-1719. |
| [8] | Gonzalez R V D, De Melo T M. Innovation by knowledge exploration and exploitation: An empirical study of the automotive industry[J]. Gestão & Produção, 2018, 25(1): 1-15. |
| [9] | Hsu M L A, Chen F H. The cross-level mediating effect of psychological capital on the organizational innovation climate-employee innovative behavior relationship[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2017, 51(2): 128-139. |
| [10] | Hsu M L A, Fan H L. Organizational innovation climate and creative outcomes: Exploring the moderating effect of time pressure[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(4): 378-386. |
| [11] | Jansen J J P, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661-1674. |
| [12] | Lenka S, Parida V, Wincent J. Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2017, 34(1): 92-100. |
| [13] | March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87. |
| [14] | Mohamed R S S. Technological innovation in tourism and events industry: A hybrid future of Events[J]. International Journal for Tourism, Archeology and Hospitality, 2022, 2(3): 271-286. |
| [15] | Park O, Bae J, Hong W. High-commitment HRM system, HR capability, and ambidextrous technological innovation[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2019, 30(9): 1526-1548. |
| [16] | Pavlou P A, El Sawy O A. The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(3): 443-471. |
| [17] | Ritter T, Gemünden H G. The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 57(5): 548-556. |
| [18] | Wei Z L, Yi Y Q, Yuan C H. Bottom-up learning, organizational formalization, and ambidextrous innovation[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2011, 24(3): 314-329. |
| [19] | Wiratmadja I I, Profityo W B, Rumanti A A. Drivers of innovation ambidexterity on small medium enterprises (SMEs) performance[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 4423-4434. |
| [20] | 白景坤, 丁军霞. 网络能力与双元创新的关系——环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(8): 138-148. |
| [BAI Jingkun, DING Junxia. Network capability and ambidextrous innovation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2016, 37(8): 138-148.] | |
| [21] | 曹春梅, 许淼鑫. 自我价值感权变性对无边界职业心智的影响: 自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 上海管理科学, 2023, 45(5): 73-78. |
| [CAO Chunmei, XU Miaoxin. The effect of contingencies of self-worth on boundaryless career mindset: The mediating role of self-efficacy[J]. Shanghai Management Science, 2023, 45(5): 73-78.] | |
| [22] | 曹勇, 杜蔓, 肖琦, 等. 企业创新氛围、双元组织学习与创新绩效——环境动态性的调节效应[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(10): 17-22. |
| [CAO Yong, DU Man, XIAO Qi, et al. Study on the relationship among enterprise innovation climate, dual organization learning and innovation performance based on the moderating effect of environmental dynamics[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(10): 17-22.] | |
| [23] | 陈翀. 创新氛围对企业双元创新的影响研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2019. |
| [CHEN Chong. Study on the Influence of Innovation Climate on Ambidexterity Innovation of Enterprises[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019.] | |
| [24] | 陈庆江, 万茂丰, 王彦萌. 数字技术应用对企业双元创新的影响——基于组织生命周期的实证检验[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(11): 92-98. |
| [CHEN Qingjiang, WAN Maofeng, WANG Yanmeng. The influence of digital technology application on ambidextrous innovation of enterprises—Empirical test based on organizational life cycle[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(11): 92-98.] | |
| [25] | 陈一华. 制造企业数字赋能扩散及驱动商业模式创新的机理研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2021. |
| [CHEN Yihua. Research on the Diffusion Mechanism and the Driving Effect on Business Model Innovation of Digital Enablement in Manufacturing Firms[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2021.] | |
| [26] | 崔颖. 利用式创新对高绩效工作系统构建的影响研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2020, 37(5): 133-140. |
| [CUI Ying. The impact of the exploitation innovation on the construction of high performance work system[J]. Economic Survey, 2020, 37(5): 133-140.] | |
| [27] | 崔月慧, 葛宝山, 董保宝. 双元创新与新创企业绩效: 基于多层级网络结构的交互效应模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(8): 45-57. |
| [CUI Yuehui, GE Baoshan, DONG Baobao. Ambidextrous innovation and new venture performance: A combined moderating effect model based on the multilevel network structure[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(8): 45-57.] | |
| [28] | 杜璿, 邱国栋. 组织创新氛围对员工创新行为的影响——创新自我效能感和心理涉入的双重中介效应[J]. 财经论丛, 2019(4): 92-103. |
| [DU Xuan, QIU Guodong. The influence of organizational innovation climate on employee innovation:The double mediating effect of innovative self-efficacy and psychological involvement[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2019(4): 92-103.] | |
| [29] | 付丙海, 谢富纪, 韩雨卿. 创新链资源整合、双元性创新与创新绩效: 基于长三角新创企业的实证研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2015(12): 176-186. |
| [FU Binghai, XIE Fuji, HAN Yuqing. Innovation chain resources integration, ambidextrous innovation and innovation performance: An empirical analysis based on the new ventures in Yangtze River Delta[J]. China Soft Science, 2015(12): 176-186.] | |
| [30] | 顾远东, 周文莉, 彭纪生. 组织支持感对研发人员创新行为的影响机制研究[J]. 管理科学, 2014, 27(1): 109-119. |
| [GU Yuandong, ZHOU Wenli, PENG Jisheng. Study on influencing mechanism of perceived organizational support on R&D staffs’ innovative behavior[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2014, 27(1): 109-119.] | |
| [31] | 郭韬, 邢璐, 黄瑶. 创新网络知识转移对企业创新绩效的影响——双元创新的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(15): 114-119. |
| [GUO Tao, XING Lu, HUANG Yao. Study on the influence of knowledge transfer of innovation network on firm’s innovation performance—The intermediary role of ambidextrous innovation[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(15): 114-119.] | |
| [32] | 侯羽迪, 张玉臣, 唐慧洁. 企业数字化影响双元创新绩效的机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(12): 142-149. |
| [HOU Yudi, ZHANG Yuchen, TANG Huijie. Research on the influencing mechanism of an enterprise’s digitalization on its dual innovation performance[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(12): 142-149.] | |
| [33] | 黄微平, 陈星. 高管技术烙印对高科技企业绿色创新能力的影响——基于数字赋能视域[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(5): 7-12. |
| [HUANG Weiping, CHEN Xing. Influence of executives’ technology imprinting on green innovation capability of high-tech enterprises: Under the vision of digital empowerment[J]. Soft Science, 2024, 38(5): 7-12.] | |
| [34] | 蒋丽芹, 郑洁, 张慧芹. 非沉淀冗余、科技向善与企业创新绩效——数字赋能调节作用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(23): 176-184. |
| [JIANG Liqin, ZHENG Jie, ZHANG Huiqin. Unabsorbed slack resource, technology for good, and enterprise innovation performance: The moderating effect of digital empowerment[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(23): 176-184.] | |
| [35] | 蒋兴华, 柴诗咏, 范心雨, 等. 国家重大科技项目创新绩效的主要影响因素及其作用机制——基于科研团队主体视角的实证分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(18): 8-14. |
| [JIANG Xinghua, CHAI Shiyong, FAN Xinyu, et al. Main influencing factors and mechanism of innovation performance of China’s major science and technology projects: Empirical analysis based on the perspective of scientific research team[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(18): 8-14.] | |
| [36] | 李摇琴. 科技型员工期权与企业创新绩效: 基于利益趋同和信息相容效应视角[J]. 财贸研究, 2022, 33(11): 82-96. |
| [LI Yaoqin. Technological employee stock option and corporate innovation: Based on the perspective of interest convergence and information compatibility[J]. Finance and Trade Research, 2022, 33(11): 82-96.] | |
| [37] | 刘智强, 邓传军, 廖建桥, 等. 组织支持、地位认知与员工创新: 雇佣多样性视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(10): 80-94. |
| [LIU Zhiqiang, DENG Chuanjun, LIAO Jianqiao, et al. Organizational support, perceived status and employees’innovative behavior: Perspective of employment diversity[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2015, 18(10): 80-94.] | |
| [38] | 吕途, 林欢, 陈昊. 动态能力对企业新产品开发绩效的影响——双元创新的中介作用[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(8): 67-75, 87. |
| [LYU Tu, LIN Huan, CHEN Hao. Empirical research on the influence of dynamic capability on enterprise new product development performance—The mediating role of ambidextrous innovation[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2020(8): 67-75, 87.] | |
| [39] | 马如锦, 李艳霞. 法兰克福展览公司国际化战略研究: 双元性视角[J]. 江苏商论, 2016(2): 12-18. |
| [MA Rujin, LI Yanxia. A study on the internationalization strategy of Frankfurt exhibition company: A dual perspective[J]. Jiangsu Commercial Forum, 2016(2): 12-18.] | |
| [40] | 欧丹丽, 魏嫚. 数字赋能农产品电商价值共创研究[J]. 农业展望, 2022, 18(11): 3-11. |
| [OU Danli, WEI Man. Research on value co-creation of digital enabling agricultural E-commerce[J]. Agricultural Outlook, 2022, 18(11): 3-11.] | |
| [41] | 裴超. 走出围城新时期会展业需要创新发展开辟新动能[J]. 中国会展, 2022(19): 28-31. |
| [PEI Chao. Out of the city the convention and exhibition industry needs to develop new driving forces through innovation in the new era[J]. China Conference & Exhibition, 2022(19): 28-31.] | |
| [42] | 戚聿东, 肖旭. 数字经济时代的企业管理变革[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(6): 135-152. |
| [QI Yudong, XIAO Xu. Transformation of enterprise management in the era of digital economy[J]. Management World, 2020, 36(6): 135-152.] | |
| [43] | 钱锡红, 杨永福, 徐万里. 企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效—— 一个交互效应模型[J]. 管理世界, 2010, 26(5): 118-129. |
| [QIAN Xihong, YANG Yongfu, XU Wanli. The position of firms’ network, the absorptive capacity, and the performance in innovation: An interactive effect model[J]. Management World, 2010, 26(5): 118-129.] | |
| [44] | 邵剑兵, 吴珊. 高管团队薪酬差距对双元创新的影响研究——来自高新技术企业的经验证据[J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(3): 39-49. |
| [SHAO Jianbing, WU Shan. Research on the influence of senior management’s pay gap on ambidextrous innovation: Empirical evidence from high-tech enterprises[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2021(3): 39-49.] | |
| [45] | 石玉玲, 陈万明. 我国知识管理研究现状、热点与趋势[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2020(4): 85-91. |
| [SHI Yuling, CHEN Wanming. Current situation, hot topics and trends of knowledge management research in China[J]. New Century Library, 2020(4): 85-91.] | |
| [46] | 王辉, 常阳. 组织创新氛围、工作动机对员工创新行为的影响[J]. 管理科学, 2017, 30(3): 51-62. |
| [WANG Hui, CHANG Yang. The influence of organizational creative climate and work motivation on employee’s creative behavior[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2017, 30(3): 51-62.] | |
| [47] | 王伟光, 韩旭. 国际化速度、双元创新与“专精特新”企业绩效——基于115家中国制造业单项冠军上市企业的实证研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(10): 51-67. |
| [WANG Weiguang, HAN Xu. Internationalization speed, dual innovation, and performance of “SRDI” enterprises: Based on the empirical research of 115 Chinese manufacturing single-champion listed enterprises[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2023, 45(10): 51-67.] | |
| [48] | 杨国梁, 程萌, 曾晶筌. 中国展览业高质量发展的创新思维[J]. 会展前瞻, 2020, 1(1): 112-121. |
| [YANG Guoliang, CHENG Meng, ZENG Jingquan. Innovative thinking on the high-quality development of China’s exhibition industry[J]. Exhibition Outlook, 2020, 1(1): 112-121.] | |
| [49] | 阳镇, 王文娜, 陈劲. 研发合作、数字化赋能与企业创新绩效——基于中国制造企业的微观证据[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2023(3): 137-150. |
| [YANG Zhen, WANG Wenna, CHEN Jin. R&D cooperation, digital empowerment and enterprise innovation performance: Micro-evidence based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises[J]. Comparative Economic and Social Systems, 2023(3): 137-150.] | |
| [50] | 喻登科, 熊曼玉. 包容性文化视域下隐性知识多样性对企业创新绩效的作用研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(16): 107-117. |
| [YU Dengke, XIONG Manyu. The role of tacit knowledge diversity on enterprise innovation performance from the perspective of inclusive culture[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024, 41(16): 107-117.] | |
| [51] | 曾德明, 王磊, 彭盾. 核心企业知识集成对供应链中知识转移的影响[J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(8): 60-64. |
| [ZENG Deming, WANG Lei, PENG Dun. Influence of core enterprise knowledge integration on knowledge transfer in supply chain[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2010, 29(8): 60-64.] | |
| [52] | 詹小慧, 李群. 组织支持感与员工创新绩效: 一个跨层次的调节模型[J]. 当代经济管理, 2020, 42(1): 71-77. |
| [ZHAN Xiaohui, LI Qun. Perceived organizational support and employee innovation performance: A multilevel moderated model[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2020, 42(1): 71-77.] | |
| [53] | 张凡. 会展数字化转型的十点看法[J]. 中国会展, 2023(13): 56-59. |
| [ZHANG Fan. Ten views on digital transformation of exhibition and convention[J]. China Conference & Exhibition, 2023(13): 56-59.] | |
| [54] | 张健东, 张妍, 国伟, 等. 高管格局对企业创新绩效的影响机制——探索性案例研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2021, 14(6): 588-604. |
| [ZHANG Jiandong, ZHANG Yan, GUO Wei, et al. The influence mechanism of top management vision on enterprise innovation performances: An exploratory case study[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies, 2021, 14(6): 588-604.] | |
| [55] | 张振刚, 肖丹, 许明伦. 数据赋能对制造业企业绩效的影响: 战略柔性的中介作用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(10): 126-131. |
| [ZHANG Zhengang, XIAO Dan, XU Minglun. Impact of data empowerment on manufacturing enterprise performance: Mediating effects of strategic flexibility[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(10): 126-131.] | |
| [56] | 张卓, 张福君. 组织创新氛围对企业新产品绩效的影响: 信任的调节效应[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(7): 102-109. |
| [ZHANG Zhuo, ZHANG Fujun. Influence of organizational innovation atmosphere on new product performance: The moderating effect of trust[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(7): 102-109.] | |
| [57] | 周文辉, 王鹏程, 杨苗. 数字化赋能促进大规模定制技术创新[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(8): 1516-1523. |
| [ZHOU Wenhui, WANG Pengcheng, YANG Miao. Digital empowerment promotes mass customization technology innovation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(8): 1516-1523.] | |
| [58] | 朱向琳, 杨乃定, 张明珍. 企业创新行为: 度量方法和影响因素研究评述[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(12): 131-138. |
| [ZHU Xianglin, YANG Naiding, ZHANG Mingzhen. Innovation behavior of enterprises: A review of measurement methods and influencing factors[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(12): 131-138.] |
| [1] | 李明龙, 孙晓洋, 郭海荣, 赵梦阳. 数字经济能推动旅游业高质量发展吗?基于PSTR模型的实证分析[J]. 旅游导刊, 2024, 8(5): 1-26. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||