微信公众号

编辑部微信号

旅游导刊 ›› 2019, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3): 71-92.DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.111

• 综述论文 • 上一篇    

主观幸福感的理论源流及其在旅游研究中的应用:一个批判性文献综述

梁增贤()   

  1. 中山大学旅游学院 广东广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-26 修回日期:2019-04-10 出版日期:2019-06-30 发布日期:2019-07-11
  • 作者简介:梁增贤(1984— ),男,广西南宁人,人文地理学博士,中山大学旅游学院副教授、系主任,中山大学旅游发展与规划研究中心、旅游休闲与社会发展研究中心成员,研究方向:旅游地理学、主题公园、城市旅游、休闲与生活质量。通讯作者。E-mail:liangzx3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本研究为国家社会科学基金一般项目“旅游消费移民主观幸福感与管理提升研究”阶段性成果

The Evolution of Subjective Well-Being and Its Application in Tourism Research : A Critical Review

Zengxian LIANG()

  1. School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen Univerity, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2018-09-26 Revised:2019-04-10 Online:2019-06-30 Published:2019-07-11

摘要:

旅游领域的主观幸福感研究已经积累了一定的成果。然而,旅游学界对主观幸福感理论渊源和研究方法的理解仍存在较大分歧,导致相关研究缺乏理论贡献。本文试图理清主观幸福感的源流,比较分析各种研究方法和量表,并对旅游领域幸福感研究存在的问题进行批判性反思。本文指出,主观幸福感属于生活质量范畴,有着多种哲学基础和理论来源,如享乐主义理论、期望理论、原真快乐理论、幸福主义理论和目标清单理论等。基于不同哲学基础的主观幸福感研究已经发展出一系列研究方法和测量量表,每一种研究方法和测量量表都有其优劣势和适用条件,需加以区分。旅游研究未来应该理清主观幸福感的概念基础,坚持问题导向的研究设计,避免随意关联的因果分析,多采用混合研究方法。

关键词: 生活质量; 主观幸福感; 生活满意度; 享乐主义; 幸福主义

Abstract:

The application of Subjective well-being (SWB) in tourism research has increased in the past decades, but misunderstanding, misusage, and confusion remain. This paper aims to trace the evolution and new trends of SWB and makes critical reviews on its tourism studies. SWB is both a psychological construct and a social construction, and also an important filed of quality of life (QOL) study. The scientific study of SWB began nearly 100 years ago, and has been shaped and influenced by the efforts of Ed Diener and his team. Unfortunately, one continuing problem of SWB is lack of consensus on the conception and measurement of SWB, since it has multiple origins of philosophy and theories, such as hedonistic theories, desire theories, authentic happiness theories, eudaimonistic (or “nature-fulfillment”) theories and list theories. Among these above, hedonistic is widely accepted as a main philosophical foundation and has developed a series of measurement scales, catering to various contexts and research purposes. Eudaimonistic and other theories have also developed some scales. Each scale has advantages and disadvantages, as well as applicable condition. However, some studies ignore or misunderstand the philosophical foundation and applicable condition of SWB scale, and raise some problematic conclusion, such as oversimplification of classic scale, misusage in unsuitable situation, mis-synthesis of scales with different philosophical origins, mis-interchange of QOL, GL, LS and SWB, and even examination on causal relationship between SWB and various constructs that without or with less theoretical connection.

Keywords: Quality of Life (QoL); Subjective Well-Being (SWB); Life Satisfaction (LS); Hedonistic; Eudaimonistic

中图分类号: